From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: xu910121@sina.com
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dave.Martin" <dave.martin@arm.com>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: Kernel patch cases qemu live migration failed.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:26:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fecfc67da4caab1d677a8b4cd5386b3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201015040639.70C6D414009F@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
Hi
Please don't use my arm.com address anymore, nobody reads it...
On 2020-10-15 05:06, 张东旭 wrote:
> I'm so sorry for disturbing you.
>
> When I apply this kernel patch:KVM: arm64/sve: System register
> context switch and access support
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c?id=73433762fcaeb9d59e84d299021c6b15466c96dd
This patch was only introduced in 5.2, and wasn't supposed to be
backported to anything else.
> qemu live migration will failed with messages:
> qemu-kvm: Invalid value 233 expecting positive value
> <= 232
> qemu-kvm: Failed to load cpu:cpreg_vmstate_array_len
> New version kernel exclude ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 register when host not
> support SVE feature,
> so qemu ioctl kvm(KVM_GET_REG_LIST) will not contain ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1
> register.
>
> I'm using CentOS Linux kernel, old kernel version:4.18.0-80.11.el8
> (migration source)
> new kernel version:4.18.0-147.5.el8 (migration destination)
>
> CentOS linux kernel version 4.18.0-111.el8 applied this patch. So
> 4.18.0-147.5.el8 also applied this patch.
>
> Migration source and destination hosts have the same hardware, just
> kernel version is different,
> and the hardware on either side of the migration not support SVE.
>
> Is there some good suggestions,which can make sure old version
> kernel live migration to new version kernel with qemu?
I['m afraid you should take this with your distribution of
choice, unless you can reproduce the problem with mainline kernels.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: xu910121@sina.com
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dave.Martin" <dave.martin@arm.com>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: Kernel patch cases qemu live migration failed.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 12:26:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fecfc67da4caab1d677a8b4cd5386b3@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201015040639.70C6D414009F@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn>
Hi
Please don't use my arm.com address anymore, nobody reads it...
On 2020-10-15 05:06, 张东旭 wrote:
> I'm so sorry for disturbing you.
>
> When I apply this kernel patch:KVM: arm64/sve: System register
> context switch and access support
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c?id=73433762fcaeb9d59e84d299021c6b15466c96dd
This patch was only introduced in 5.2, and wasn't supposed to be
backported to anything else.
> qemu live migration will failed with messages:
> qemu-kvm: Invalid value 233 expecting positive value
> <= 232
> qemu-kvm: Failed to load cpu:cpreg_vmstate_array_len
> New version kernel exclude ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1 register when host not
> support SVE feature,
> so qemu ioctl kvm(KVM_GET_REG_LIST) will not contain ID_AA64ZFR0_EL1
> register.
>
> I'm using CentOS Linux kernel, old kernel version:4.18.0-80.11.el8
> (migration source)
> new kernel version:4.18.0-147.5.el8 (migration destination)
>
> CentOS linux kernel version 4.18.0-111.el8 applied this patch. So
> 4.18.0-147.5.el8 also applied this patch.
>
> Migration source and destination hosts have the same hardware, just
> kernel version is different,
> and the hardware on either side of the migration not support SVE.
>
> Is there some good suggestions,which can make sure old version
> kernel live migration to new version kernel with qemu?
I['m afraid you should take this with your distribution of
choice, unless you can reproduce the problem with mainline kernels.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-15 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-15 4:06 Kernel patch cases qemu live migration failed 张东旭
2020-10-15 4:06 ` 张东旭
2020-10-15 11:26 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-10-15 11:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-15 13:35 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-15 13:35 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-15 13:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-15 13:52 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-15 14:41 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-15 14:41 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-15 14:57 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-15 14:57 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-19 9:25 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-19 9:25 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-19 11:32 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-19 11:32 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-19 11:43 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-19 11:43 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-19 13:40 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-19 13:40 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-19 14:18 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-19 14:18 ` Peter Maydell
2020-10-19 14:58 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-19 14:58 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-19 15:23 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-19 15:23 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-19 16:36 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-19 16:36 ` Dave Martin
2020-10-15 13:26 ` Andrew Jones
2020-10-15 13:26 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7fecfc67da4caab1d677a8b4cd5386b3@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xu910121@sina.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.