From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, narmstrong@baylibre.com
Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 0/2] amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: two small fixes
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:24:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h8snlrvbf.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191130145821.1490349-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> While working on power domain support for the 32-bit SoCs I had some
> crashes when trying to actually use the power domains. Turns out I had
> a bug in my patches which add support for the older SoCs to
> meson-ee-pwrc. However, I didn't notice these because the driver probed
> just fine.
>
> This is my attempt to spot "problems" (bugs in my code) earlier.
>
> RESEND: sorry for the noise, I forgot to add the linux-amlogic mailing
> list. This is important so patchwork can pick up these patches.
Queued as fixes for v5.5,
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, narmstrong@baylibre.com
Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 0/2] amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: two small fixes
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:24:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h8snlrvbf.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191130145821.1490349-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> While working on power domain support for the 32-bit SoCs I had some
> crashes when trying to actually use the power domains. Turns out I had
> a bug in my patches which add support for the older SoCs to
> meson-ee-pwrc. However, I didn't notice these because the driver probed
> just fine.
>
> This is my attempt to spot "problems" (bugs in my code) earlier.
>
> RESEND: sorry for the noise, I forgot to add the linux-amlogic mailing
> list. This is important so patchwork can pick up these patches.
Queued as fixes for v5.5,
Thanks,
Kevin
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, narmstrong@baylibre.com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v1 0/2] amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: two small fixes
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:24:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h8snlrvbf.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191130145821.1490349-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:
> While working on power domain support for the 32-bit SoCs I had some
> crashes when trying to actually use the power domains. Turns out I had
> a bug in my patches which add support for the older SoCs to
> meson-ee-pwrc. However, I didn't notice these because the driver probed
> just fine.
>
> This is my attempt to spot "problems" (bugs in my code) earlier.
>
> RESEND: sorry for the noise, I forgot to add the linux-amlogic mailing
> list. This is important so patchwork can pick up these patches.
Queued as fixes for v5.5,
Thanks,
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-30 14:58 [PATCH RESEND v1 0/2] amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: two small fixes Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` [PATCH RESEND v1 1/2] soc: amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: propagate PD provider registration errors Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` [PATCH RESEND v1 2/2] soc: amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: propagate errors from pm_genpd_init() Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-11-30 14:58 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2019-12-09 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2019-12-09 22:24 ` [PATCH RESEND v1 0/2] amlogic: meson-ee-pwrc: two small fixes Kevin Hilman
2019-12-09 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2019-12-09 23:47 ` patchwork-bot+linux-amlogic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7h8snlrvbf.fsf@baylibre.com \
--to=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.