From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@samsung.com>,
Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>,
Inderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
olof@lixom.net, Tushar Behera <trblinux@gmail.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: EXYNOS: mcpm: Don't rely on firmware's secondary_cpu_start
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:09:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7htx7uq7k1.fsf@paris.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402096465-13218-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> (Doug Anderson's message of "Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:14:25 -0700")
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes:
> On exynos mcpm systems the firmware is hardcoded to jump to an address
> in SRAM (0x02073000) when secondary CPUs come up. By default the
> firmware puts a bunch of code at that location. That code expects the
> kernel to fill in a few slots with addresses that it uses to jump back
> to the kernel's entry point for secondary CPUs.
>
> Originally (on prerelease hardware) this firmware code contained a
> bunch of workarounds to deal with boot ROM bugs. However on all
> shipped hardware we simply use this code to redirect to a kernel
> function for bringing up the CPUs.
>
> Let's stop relying on the code provided by the bootloader and just
> plumb in our own (simple) code jump to the kernel. This has the nice
> benefit of fixing problems due to the fact that older bootloaders
> (like the one shipped on the Samsung Chromebook 2) might have put
> slightly different code into this location.
>
> Once suspend/resume is implemented for systems using exynos-mcpm we'll
> need to make sure we reinstall our fixed up code after resume. ...but
> that's not anything new since IRAM (and thus the address of the
> mcpm_entry_point) is lost across suspend/resume anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
I confirm that this patch (plus the enable CCI hack[1]) allows me to see
all 8 cores when booting linux-next on my Chromebook2.
Kevin
[1] While waiting for the forth-coming patch from Andrew to enable the
CCI port for the boot cluster), I do this from u-boot before starting
the kernel (based on earlier email from Doug):
mw.l 10d25000 3 # Enable CCI from U-Boot
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@linaro.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: EXYNOS: mcpm: Don't rely on firmware's secondary_cpu_start
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:09:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7htx7uq7k1.fsf@paris.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1402096465-13218-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> (Doug Anderson's message of "Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:14:25 -0700")
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> writes:
> On exynos mcpm systems the firmware is hardcoded to jump to an address
> in SRAM (0x02073000) when secondary CPUs come up. By default the
> firmware puts a bunch of code at that location. That code expects the
> kernel to fill in a few slots with addresses that it uses to jump back
> to the kernel's entry point for secondary CPUs.
>
> Originally (on prerelease hardware) this firmware code contained a
> bunch of workarounds to deal with boot ROM bugs. However on all
> shipped hardware we simply use this code to redirect to a kernel
> function for bringing up the CPUs.
>
> Let's stop relying on the code provided by the bootloader and just
> plumb in our own (simple) code jump to the kernel. This has the nice
> benefit of fixing problems due to the fact that older bootloaders
> (like the one shipped on the Samsung Chromebook 2) might have put
> slightly different code into this location.
>
> Once suspend/resume is implemented for systems using exynos-mcpm we'll
> need to make sure we reinstall our fixed up code after resume. ...but
> that's not anything new since IRAM (and thus the address of the
> mcpm_entry_point) is lost across suspend/resume anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
I confirm that this patch (plus the enable CCI hack[1]) allows me to see
all 8 cores when booting linux-next on my Chromebook2.
Kevin
[1] While waiting for the forth-coming patch from Andrew to enable the
CCI port for the boot cluster), I do this from u-boot before starting
the kernel (based on earlier email from Doug):
mw.l 10d25000 3 # Enable CCI from U-Boot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-09 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-06 21:43 [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: mcpm: Don't rely on firmware's secondary_cpu_start Doug Anderson
2014-06-06 21:43 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-06 22:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-06 22:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-06 22:43 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-06 22:43 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-06 22:46 ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-06-06 22:46 ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-06-06 23:14 ` [PATCH v2] " Doug Anderson
2014-06-06 23:14 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-06 23:14 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-07 1:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-07 1:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-09 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2014-06-09 18:09 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-06-09 20:05 ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-06-09 20:05 ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-06-09 20:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-09 20:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-09 20:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-06-09 20:35 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-06-09 20:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-09 20:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-16 18:37 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-16 18:37 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-16 18:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-16 18:47 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-07 18:12 ` [PATCH] " Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-07 18:12 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-09 17:03 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-09 17:03 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-09 22:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-09 22:38 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-10 8:12 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-10 8:12 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-10 15:21 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-10 15:21 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-10 15:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-10 15:49 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-11 4:52 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-11 4:52 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-11 10:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-11 10:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-11 12:14 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-11 12:14 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-11 13:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-11 13:15 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-06-11 13:29 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-11 13:29 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-11 13:34 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-06-11 13:34 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2014-06-11 15:19 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-11 15:19 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-11 15:28 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-11 15:28 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-13 11:54 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-13 11:54 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-13 13:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-13 13:29 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-06-13 15:10 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-13 15:10 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-16 7:40 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-16 7:40 ` Chander Kashyap
2014-06-16 18:35 ` Doug Anderson
2014-06-16 18:35 ` Doug Anderson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7htx7uq7k1.fsf@paris.lan \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=a.kesavan@samsung.com \
--cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=inderpal.s@samsung.com \
--cc=javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=trblinux@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.