All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] soc: amlogic: Add Meson GX Clock Measure driver
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:41:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hy3eknl3l.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCA5B87TkfOtQd==PxDK74kJ+XWMgY-36QK2TT9p-vAEUA@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Blumenstingl's message of "Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:44:09 +0200")

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> Hi Neil,
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:41 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 03/07/2018 21:18, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> > Hi Neil,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:23 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Amlogic Meson GX SoCs embeds a clock measurer IP to measure the internal
>> >> clock paths frequencies.
>> >> The precision is in the order of the MHz.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig                |   8 ++
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile               |   1 +
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  3 files changed, 233 insertions(+)
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> index b04f6e4..4a3217d 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
>> >>  menu "Amlogic SoC drivers"
>> >>
>> >> +config MESON_GX_CLK_MEASURE
>> >> +       bool "Amlogic Meson GX SoC Clock Measure driver"
>> >> +       depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST
>> >> +       default ARCH_MESON
>> >> +       help
>> >> +         Say yes to support of Measuring a set of internal SoC clocks
>> >> +         from the debugfs interface.
>> >> +
>> >>  config MESON_GX_SOCINFO
>> >>         bool "Amlogic Meson GX SoC Information driver"
>> >>         depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> index 8fa3218..a0ad966 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_CLK_MEASURE) += meson-gx-clk-measure.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_SOCINFO) += meson-gx-socinfo.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_PM_DOMAINS) += meson-gx-pwrc-vpu.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_MX_SOCINFO) += meson-mx-socinfo.o
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..434d9f3
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(57, "wave420l_c"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(58, "wave420l_b"),
>> > AFAIK the Chips&Media WAVE420L video codec is only available on GXM (S912)
>> > I assume reading this on GXBB or GXL simply reads 0?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> >
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(59, "hcodec"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(60, "alt_32k"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(61, "gpio_msr"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(62, "hevc"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(66, "vid_lock"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(70, "pwm_f"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(71, "pwm_e"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(72, "pwm_d"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(73, "pwm_C"),
>> > should this be pwm_c (instead of pwm_C)?
>> >
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(75, "aoclkx2_int"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(76, "aoclk_int"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(77, "rng_ring_osc_0"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(78, "rng_ring_osc_1"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(79, "rng_ring_osc_2"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(80, "rng_ring_osc_3"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(81, "vapb"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(82, "ge2d"),
>> >> +};
>> > I did a quick check whether the clock IDs are really the same for all GX SoCs:
>> > apart from clocks missing on older SoCs (see for example the WAVE420L
>> > clocks above) there were only minor renames but no conflicts!
>>
>> I did the same work ! I will add this detail to the commit log.
>> Thanks for checking ;-)
> :)
>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +static int meson_gx_measure_id(struct meson_gx_msr *priv, unsigned int id)
>> >> +{
>> >> +       unsigned int val;
>> >> +       int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +       regmap_write(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, 0);
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Set measurement gate to 50uS */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_CLK_DIV,
>> >> +                          FIELD_PREP(MSR_CLK_DIV, DIV_50US));
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Set ID */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_CLK_SRC,
>> >> +                          FIELD_PREP(MSR_CLK_SRC, id));
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Enable & Start */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0,
>> >> +                          MSR_RUN | MSR_ENABLE,
>> >> +                          MSR_RUN | MSR_ENABLE);
>> >> +
>> >> +       ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0,
>> >> +                                      val, !(val & MSR_BUSY), 10, 1000);
>> >> +       if (ret)
>> >> +               return ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Disable */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_ENABLE, 0);
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Get the value in MHz*64 */
>> >> +       regmap_read(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG2, &val);
>> >> +
>> >> +       return (((val + 31) & MSR_VAL_MASK) / 64) * 1000000;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int clk_msr_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>> >> +{
>> >> +       struct meson_gx_msr_id *clk_msr_id = s->private;
>> >> +       int val;
>> >> +
>> >> +       val = meson_gx_measure_id(clk_msr_id->priv, clk_msr_id->id);
>> >> +       if (val < 0)
>> >> +               return val;
>> >> +
>> >> +       seq_printf(s, "%d\n", val);
>>
>> With jerome, we managed to have a much higher precision by cycling over the divider
>> and checking when the counter overflows. And I will print the precision in the clock debugfs
>> entry.
> great that you could even improve the precision!
>
>> >> +
>> >> +       return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(clk_msr);
>> > have you considered modelling this as clock driver instead?
>>
>> Yes, but it can wait.
>> Actually this clk-msr can be feed to GEN_CLK and be outputted to a pad,
>> but all this is only for debug, so we can stick to debugfs for now.
>>
>> Question, should I separate the clocks in a subdirectory and add a summary file like
>> for the clk debugfs ?
>>
>>
>> /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr
>> ------------------|--- summary
>> ------------------|--- clks
>> -----------------------|--- ring_osc_out_ee_0
>> ...
>> -----------------------|--- ge2d
>>
>> ?
> this is exactly why I was curious if you considered implementing this
> as clock driver instead
> based on your description above each measured clock will have the
> following properties:
> - id (passed to the clkmsr IP block)
> - name (human readable name)
> - clock rate
> - accuracy
>
> doesn't CCF provide everything except "id"? you'll even get the summary
>
> can you explain how you would use the clkmsr output?
> here's how I would use it:
> - assume I'm debugging something broken
> - I suspect that it may be due to the clock setup
> - grep "suspicious-clock" /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> - compare the grep output with /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr/suspicious-clock
>
> if it was a CCF driver I could simply do:
> grep "suspicious-clock" /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> -> this would return "suspicious-clock" (which is what the kernel can
> configure) and "clkmsr_suspicious-clock" (which is what clkmsr reads)

Even futther, Couldn't this measure IP be used by the current CCF code
(as an additonal, optional property) such the the debugfs clk_summary
uses it directly?

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@baylibre.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] soc: amlogic: Add Meson GX Clock Measure driver
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:41:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hy3eknl3l.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCA5B87TkfOtQd==PxDK74kJ+XWMgY-36QK2TT9p-vAEUA@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Blumenstingl's message of "Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:44:09 +0200")

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> Hi Neil,
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:41 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 03/07/2018 21:18, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> > Hi Neil,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:23 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Amlogic Meson GX SoCs embeds a clock measurer IP to measure the internal
>> >> clock paths frequencies.
>> >> The precision is in the order of the MHz.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig                |   8 ++
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile               |   1 +
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  3 files changed, 233 insertions(+)
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> index b04f6e4..4a3217d 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
>> >>  menu "Amlogic SoC drivers"
>> >>
>> >> +config MESON_GX_CLK_MEASURE
>> >> +       bool "Amlogic Meson GX SoC Clock Measure driver"
>> >> +       depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST
>> >> +       default ARCH_MESON
>> >> +       help
>> >> +         Say yes to support of Measuring a set of internal SoC clocks
>> >> +         from the debugfs interface.
>> >> +
>> >>  config MESON_GX_SOCINFO
>> >>         bool "Amlogic Meson GX SoC Information driver"
>> >>         depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> index 8fa3218..a0ad966 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_CLK_MEASURE) += meson-gx-clk-measure.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_SOCINFO) += meson-gx-socinfo.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_PM_DOMAINS) += meson-gx-pwrc-vpu.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_MX_SOCINFO) += meson-mx-socinfo.o
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..434d9f3
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(57, "wave420l_c"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(58, "wave420l_b"),
>> > AFAIK the Chips&Media WAVE420L video codec is only available on GXM (S912)
>> > I assume reading this on GXBB or GXL simply reads 0?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> >
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(59, "hcodec"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(60, "alt_32k"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(61, "gpio_msr"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(62, "hevc"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(66, "vid_lock"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(70, "pwm_f"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(71, "pwm_e"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(72, "pwm_d"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(73, "pwm_C"),
>> > should this be pwm_c (instead of pwm_C)?
>> >
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(75, "aoclkx2_int"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(76, "aoclk_int"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(77, "rng_ring_osc_0"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(78, "rng_ring_osc_1"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(79, "rng_ring_osc_2"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(80, "rng_ring_osc_3"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(81, "vapb"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(82, "ge2d"),
>> >> +};
>> > I did a quick check whether the clock IDs are really the same for all GX SoCs:
>> > apart from clocks missing on older SoCs (see for example the WAVE420L
>> > clocks above) there were only minor renames but no conflicts!
>>
>> I did the same work ! I will add this detail to the commit log.
>> Thanks for checking ;-)
> :)
>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +static int meson_gx_measure_id(struct meson_gx_msr *priv, unsigned int id)
>> >> +{
>> >> +       unsigned int val;
>> >> +       int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +       regmap_write(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, 0);
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Set measurement gate to 50uS */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_CLK_DIV,
>> >> +                          FIELD_PREP(MSR_CLK_DIV, DIV_50US));
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Set ID */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_CLK_SRC,
>> >> +                          FIELD_PREP(MSR_CLK_SRC, id));
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Enable & Start */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0,
>> >> +                          MSR_RUN | MSR_ENABLE,
>> >> +                          MSR_RUN | MSR_ENABLE);
>> >> +
>> >> +       ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0,
>> >> +                                      val, !(val & MSR_BUSY), 10, 1000);
>> >> +       if (ret)
>> >> +               return ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Disable */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_ENABLE, 0);
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Get the value in MHz*64 */
>> >> +       regmap_read(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG2, &val);
>> >> +
>> >> +       return (((val + 31) & MSR_VAL_MASK) / 64) * 1000000;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int clk_msr_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>> >> +{
>> >> +       struct meson_gx_msr_id *clk_msr_id = s->private;
>> >> +       int val;
>> >> +
>> >> +       val = meson_gx_measure_id(clk_msr_id->priv, clk_msr_id->id);
>> >> +       if (val < 0)
>> >> +               return val;
>> >> +
>> >> +       seq_printf(s, "%d\n", val);
>>
>> With jerome, we managed to have a much higher precision by cycling over the divider
>> and checking when the counter overflows. And I will print the precision in the clock debugfs
>> entry.
> great that you could even improve the precision!
>
>> >> +
>> >> +       return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(clk_msr);
>> > have you considered modelling this as clock driver instead?
>>
>> Yes, but it can wait.
>> Actually this clk-msr can be feed to GEN_CLK and be outputted to a pad,
>> but all this is only for debug, so we can stick to debugfs for now.
>>
>> Question, should I separate the clocks in a subdirectory and add a summary file like
>> for the clk debugfs ?
>>
>>
>> /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr
>> ------------------|--- summary
>> ------------------|--- clks
>> -----------------------|--- ring_osc_out_ee_0
>> ...
>> -----------------------|--- ge2d
>>
>> ?
> this is exactly why I was curious if you considered implementing this
> as clock driver instead
> based on your description above each measured clock will have the
> following properties:
> - id (passed to the clkmsr IP block)
> - name (human readable name)
> - clock rate
> - accuracy
>
> doesn't CCF provide everything except "id"? you'll even get the summary
>
> can you explain how you would use the clkmsr output?
> here's how I would use it:
> - assume I'm debugging something broken
> - I suspect that it may be due to the clock setup
> - grep "suspicious-clock" /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> - compare the grep output with /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr/suspicious-clock
>
> if it was a CCF driver I could simply do:
> grep "suspicious-clock" /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> -> this would return "suspicious-clock" (which is what the kernel can
> configure) and "clkmsr_suspicious-clock" (which is what clkmsr reads)

Even futther, Couldn't this measure IP be used by the current CCF code
(as an additonal, optional property) such the the debugfs clk_summary
uses it directly?

Kevin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] soc: amlogic: Add Meson GX Clock Measure driver
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2018 14:41:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hy3eknl3l.fsf@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCA5B87TkfOtQd==PxDK74kJ+XWMgY-36QK2TT9p-vAEUA@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Blumenstingl's message of "Wed, 4 Jul 2018 15:44:09 +0200")

Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> writes:

> Hi Neil,
>
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 10:41 AM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On 03/07/2018 21:18, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> > Hi Neil,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 3:23 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The Amlogic Meson GX SoCs embeds a clock measurer IP to measure the internal
>> >> clock paths frequencies.
>> >> The precision is in the order of the MHz.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig                |   8 ++
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile               |   1 +
>> >>  drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> >>  3 files changed, 233 insertions(+)
>> >>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> index b04f6e4..4a3217d 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -1,5 +1,13 @@
>> >>  menu "Amlogic SoC drivers"
>> >>
>> >> +config MESON_GX_CLK_MEASURE
>> >> +       bool "Amlogic Meson GX SoC Clock Measure driver"
>> >> +       depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST
>> >> +       default ARCH_MESON
>> >> +       help
>> >> +         Say yes to support of Measuring a set of internal SoC clocks
>> >> +         from the debugfs interface.
>> >> +
>> >>  config MESON_GX_SOCINFO
>> >>         bool "Amlogic Meson GX SoC Information driver"
>> >>         depends on ARCH_MESON || COMPILE_TEST
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> index 8fa3218..a0ad966 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/Makefile
>> >> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
>> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_CLK_MEASURE) += meson-gx-clk-measure.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_SOCINFO) += meson-gx-socinfo.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_GX_PM_DOMAINS) += meson-gx-pwrc-vpu.o
>> >>  obj-$(CONFIG_MESON_MX_SOCINFO) += meson-mx-socinfo.o
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 0000000..434d9f3
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/drivers/soc/amlogic/meson-gx-clk-measure.c
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(57, "wave420l_c"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(58, "wave420l_b"),
>> > AFAIK the Chips&Media WAVE420L video codec is only available on GXM (S912)
>> > I assume reading this on GXBB or GXL simply reads 0?
>>
>> Yes
>>
>> >
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(59, "hcodec"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(60, "alt_32k"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(61, "gpio_msr"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(62, "hevc"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(66, "vid_lock"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(70, "pwm_f"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(71, "pwm_e"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(72, "pwm_d"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(73, "pwm_C"),
>> > should this be pwm_c (instead of pwm_C)?
>> >
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(75, "aoclkx2_int"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(76, "aoclk_int"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(77, "rng_ring_osc_0"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(78, "rng_ring_osc_1"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(79, "rng_ring_osc_2"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(80, "rng_ring_osc_3"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(81, "vapb"),
>> >> +       CLK_MSR_ID(82, "ge2d"),
>> >> +};
>> > I did a quick check whether the clock IDs are really the same for all GX SoCs:
>> > apart from clocks missing on older SoCs (see for example the WAVE420L
>> > clocks above) there were only minor renames but no conflicts!
>>
>> I did the same work ! I will add this detail to the commit log.
>> Thanks for checking ;-)
> :)
>
>> >
>> >> +
>> >> +static int meson_gx_measure_id(struct meson_gx_msr *priv, unsigned int id)
>> >> +{
>> >> +       unsigned int val;
>> >> +       int ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +       regmap_write(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, 0);
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Set measurement gate to 50uS */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_CLK_DIV,
>> >> +                          FIELD_PREP(MSR_CLK_DIV, DIV_50US));
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Set ID */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_CLK_SRC,
>> >> +                          FIELD_PREP(MSR_CLK_SRC, id));
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Enable & Start */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0,
>> >> +                          MSR_RUN | MSR_ENABLE,
>> >> +                          MSR_RUN | MSR_ENABLE);
>> >> +
>> >> +       ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0,
>> >> +                                      val, !(val & MSR_BUSY), 10, 1000);
>> >> +       if (ret)
>> >> +               return ret;
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Disable */
>> >> +       regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG0, MSR_ENABLE, 0);
>> >> +
>> >> +       /* Get the value in MHz*64 */
>> >> +       regmap_read(priv->regmap, MSR_CLK_REG2, &val);
>> >> +
>> >> +       return (((val + 31) & MSR_VAL_MASK) / 64) * 1000000;
>> >> +}
>> >> +
>> >> +static int clk_msr_show(struct seq_file *s, void *data)
>> >> +{
>> >> +       struct meson_gx_msr_id *clk_msr_id = s->private;
>> >> +       int val;
>> >> +
>> >> +       val = meson_gx_measure_id(clk_msr_id->priv, clk_msr_id->id);
>> >> +       if (val < 0)
>> >> +               return val;
>> >> +
>> >> +       seq_printf(s, "%d\n", val);
>>
>> With jerome, we managed to have a much higher precision by cycling over the divider
>> and checking when the counter overflows. And I will print the precision in the clock debugfs
>> entry.
> great that you could even improve the precision!
>
>> >> +
>> >> +       return 0;
>> >> +}
>> >> +DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE(clk_msr);
>> > have you considered modelling this as clock driver instead?
>>
>> Yes, but it can wait.
>> Actually this clk-msr can be feed to GEN_CLK and be outputted to a pad,
>> but all this is only for debug, so we can stick to debugfs for now.
>>
>> Question, should I separate the clocks in a subdirectory and add a summary file like
>> for the clk debugfs ?
>>
>>
>> /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr
>> ------------------|--- summary
>> ------------------|--- clks
>> -----------------------|--- ring_osc_out_ee_0
>> ...
>> -----------------------|--- ge2d
>>
>> ?
> this is exactly why I was curious if you considered implementing this
> as clock driver instead
> based on your description above each measured clock will have the
> following properties:
> - id (passed to the clkmsr IP block)
> - name (human readable name)
> - clock rate
> - accuracy
>
> doesn't CCF provide everything except "id"? you'll even get the summary
>
> can you explain how you would use the clkmsr output?
> here's how I would use it:
> - assume I'm debugging something broken
> - I suspect that it may be due to the clock setup
> - grep "suspicious-clock" /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> - compare the grep output with /sys/kernel/debug/meson-clk-msr/suspicious-clock
>
> if it was a CCF driver I could simply do:
> grep "suspicious-clock" /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary
> -> this would return "suspicious-clock" (which is what the kernel can
> configure) and "clkmsr_suspicious-clock" (which is what clkmsr reads)

Even futther, Couldn't this measure IP be used by the current CCF code
(as an additonal, optional property) such the the debugfs clk_summary
uses it directly?

Kevin

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-09 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-03 13:21 [PATCH 0/3] Add Amlogic Meson GX SoC Clock Measure Driver Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21 ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21 ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] soc: amlogic: Add Meson GX Clock Measure driver Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 14:31   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 14:31     ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 14:31     ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 19:18   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-03 19:18     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-03 19:18     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-04  8:41     ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-04  8:41       ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-04  8:41       ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-04 13:44       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-04 13:44         ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-04 13:44         ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-09 21:41         ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2018-07-09 21:41           ` Kevin Hilman
2018-07-09 21:41           ` Kevin Hilman
2018-07-11  8:37           ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-11  8:37             ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-11  8:37             ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-14 14:41             ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-14 14:41               ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-14 14:41               ` Martin Blumenstingl
2018-07-16  8:41               ` Jerome Brunet
2018-07-16  8:41                 ` Jerome Brunet
2018-07-16  8:41                 ` Jerome Brunet
2018-07-03 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: amlogic: Add Internal Clock Measurer bindings Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-16 21:45   ` Rob Herring
2018-07-16 21:45     ` Rob Herring
2018-07-16 21:45     ` Rob Herring
2018-07-17 11:30     ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-17 11:30       ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-17 11:30       ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM64: dts: meson-gx: Add Internal Clock Measurer node Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong
2018-07-03 13:21   ` Neil Armstrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7hy3eknl3l.fsf@baylibre.com \
    --to=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.