All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>,
	Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>,
	Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] send-pack: assign remote errors to each ref
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:41:39 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vbq9xpprg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071113113710.GC15880@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2007 06:37:10 -0500")

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:

> This lets us show remote errors (e.g., a denied hook) along
> with the usual push output. ...

Yay!

> ... There are two drawbacks to this
> change:
>
>   1. cross-referencing the incoming status with the ref list
>      is worst case O(n^2) (where n = number of refs); this
>      can be fixed with a smarter implementation

Sure.

>   2. the status parsing is not foolproof. We get a line like
>
>          ng refs/heads/master arbitrary msg
>
>      which cannot be parsed unambiguously in the face of
>      refnames with spaces. We do a prefix-match so that
>      you will only run into problems if you have two refs,
>      one of which is a prefix match of the other, and the
>      longer having a space right after the prefix.

Is it really "arbitrary msg", or just a fixed set of strings?

Also I think we can rely on the order report-status extension
reports the per-ref result.  It gives back the information the
same order send-pack side supplies the head information, no?

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-14  1:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-13 10:25 [RFC/PATCH 0/3] tracking per-ref errors on push Jeff King
2007-11-13 10:27 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/3] send-pack: track errors for each ref Jeff King
2007-11-13 11:32   ` Jeff King
2007-11-13 19:04   ` Alex Riesen
2007-11-13 22:30     ` Jeff King
2007-11-13 20:18   ` Alex Riesen
2007-11-13 10:27 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/3] send-pack: check ref->status before updating tracking refs Jeff King
2007-11-13 10:29 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/3] send-pack: assign remote errors to each ref Jeff King
2007-11-13 10:29   ` Jeff King
2007-11-13 11:34 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/3] tracking per-ref errors on push Jeff King
2007-11-13 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] send-pack: track errors for each ref Jeff King
2007-11-13 11:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] send-pack: check ref->status before updating tracking refs Jeff King
2007-11-13 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] send-pack: assign remote errors to each ref Jeff King
2007-11-14  1:41   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-11-14  1:56     ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-14  2:01     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-11-14  6:12       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-15  4:54       ` Jeff King
2007-11-16  5:05         ` Junio C Hamano
2007-11-15  4:47     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vbq9xpprg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madcoder@debian.org \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=raa.lkml@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.