From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
Cc: Brandon Casey <casey@nrlssc.navy.mil>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Arjen Laarhoven <arjen@yaph.org>,
Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Mike Ralphson <mike@abacus.co.uk>
Subject: Re: What's in git.git (Oct 2008, #03; Tue, 14)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:26:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vhc7dr4f8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081015202032.GD28802@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:20:32 -0700")
"Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
>> If we can add a test case to demonstrate the existing breakage, I think we
>> can (and should) cherry-pick it to 'maint'.
>
> Yes, it probably should have gone to maint. No, it didn't go there.
> Temporary lapse in maintainer judgement.
That is Ok. I do the same all the time (and I try to rewind and rebuild
when I spot it before pushing the results out, but I am not always
successful).
I just wanted to see if there was any particular reason not to have this
on 'maint'.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-15 20:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 22:08 What's in git.git (Oct 2008, #03; Tue, 14) Junio C Hamano
2008-10-15 15:35 ` Brandon Casey
2008-10-15 17:25 ` Mike Ralphson
2008-10-15 19:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-15 20:20 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-15 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-10-15 20:36 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2008-10-16 0:58 ` [PATCH maint 1/2] t4018-diff-funcname: rework negated last expression test drafnel
[not found] ` <1224118730-24711-1-git-send-email-drafnel@gmail.com>
2008-10-16 0:58 ` [PATCH maint 2/2] t4018-diff-funcname: demonstrate end of line funcname matching flaw drafnel
2008-10-16 10:08 ` What's in git.git (Oct 2008, #03; Tue, 14) Jeff King
2008-10-16 15:21 ` Brandon Casey
2008-10-16 15:37 ` Pieter de Bie
2008-10-17 7:02 ` Arjen Laarhoven
2008-10-24 2:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-10-17 9:53 ` Jeff King
2008-10-17 23:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vhc7dr4f8.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=arjen@yaph.org \
--cc=casey@nrlssc.navy.mil \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@abacus.co.uk \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.