Re: [PATCH 2/2] merge-recursive: respect core.autocrlf

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:

> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> ---
>  builtin-merge-recursive.c |    8 ++++++++
>  t/t6033-merge-crlf.sh     |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin-merge-recursive.c b/builtin-merge-recursive.c
> index 7643f17..edd023f 100644
> --- a/builtin-merge-recursive.c
> +++ b/builtin-merge-recursive.c
> @@ -525,6 +525,7 @@ static void update_file_flags(const unsigned char *sha,
>  		enum object_type type;
>  		void *buf;
>  		unsigned long size;
> +		struct strbuf strbuf;
>  
>  		if (S_ISGITLINK(mode))
>  			die("cannot read object %s '%s': It is a submodule!",
> @@ -535,6 +536,12 @@ static void update_file_flags(const unsigned char *sha,
>  			die("cannot read object %s '%s'", sha1_to_hex(sha), path);
>  		if (type != OBJ_BLOB)
>  			die("blob expected for %s '%s'", sha1_to_hex(sha), path);
> +		strbuf_init(&strbuf, 0);
> +		if (convert_to_working_tree(path, buf, size, &strbuf)) {
> +			free(buf);
> +			size = strbuf.len;
> +			buf = strbuf_detach(&strbuf, NULL);
> +		}
>  
>  		if (make_room_for_path(path) < 0) {
>  			update_wd = 0;

Fairly straightforward fix, except that I suspect this needs to be done
only for regular files and not symlinks.

I think entry.c:write_entry() shows how this should be done.