From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Marius Storm-Olsen <marius@trolltech.com>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Respecting core.autocrlf when showing objects
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:27:15 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3mylqqu05.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080612195553.GK13626@fieldses.org>
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> writes:
> (Is there any advantage, then, to the :n:filename syntax to a user?
> Is it useful in any cases when they couldn't use HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
> instead? If not I might be tempted to cut this bit entirely (or
> postpone it till later.)
I'm not sure, but I think that while HEAD and MERGE_HEAD vs :n:
differ in the tree represented (in the index trivial / tree conflicts
are resolved) they have the same file contents for conflicting files.
I think that :n: syntax is just shorter, especially for the ancestor
(c.f. $(git merge-base HEAD MERGE_HEAD)).
And of course there is octopus merge to be considered...
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-12 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <"Storm-Olsen*"@MHS>
2008-06-09 11:40 ` [PATCH] Add testcase for merging in a CRLF repo, showing that conflict file is in LF only Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 13:37 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-06-09 14:46 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 15:05 ` Johannes Sixt
2008-06-09 19:44 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 21:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add testcase for merging in a CRLF repo Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 21:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] merge-recursive: respect core.autocrlf Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 21:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 22:59 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-09 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-09 23:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-10 8:10 ` [PATCH 0/2] Respecting core.autocrlf when showing objects Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-10 7:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] Add testcases for verifying that staged files in a conflict are CRLF, when core.autocrlf = true Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-10 7:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] Ensure that objects shown in a core.autocrlf = true repo have CRLF EOLs Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-10 15:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] Respecting core.autocrlf when showing objects Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-10 22:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-11 6:01 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-11 8:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2008-06-11 19:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-06-12 9:03 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-12 19:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-12 19:55 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-12 20:27 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2008-06-12 20:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-06-12 20:50 ` Jon Loeliger
2008-06-12 20:16 ` Marius Storm-Olsen
2008-06-09 11:40 ` [PATCH] Add testcase for merging in a CRLF repo, showing that conflict file is in LF only Marius Storm-Olsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3mylqqu05.fsf@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=marius@trolltech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.