[PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Alex Bee]

Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
drm_of.h).

Explicitly include drm_atomic.h in inno_hdmi.c to fix this.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401100949.ZVRr0pIa-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401081720.UtgAZgba-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
index 925320fef0a8..3bb8f1382612 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
+#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
 #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
 #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
 #include <drm/drm_of.h>
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

[PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Alex Bee]

Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
drm_of.h).

Explicitly include drm_atomic.h in inno_hdmi.c to fix this.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401100949.ZVRr0pIa-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401081720.UtgAZgba-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
index 925320fef0a8..3bb8f1382612 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
+#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
 #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
 #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
 #include <drm/drm_of.h>
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Alex Bee]

Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
drm_of.h).

Explicitly include drm_atomic.h in inno_hdmi.c to fix this.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401100949.ZVRr0pIa-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401081720.UtgAZgba-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
index 925320fef0a8..3bb8f1382612 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
+#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
 #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
 #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
 #include <drm/drm_of.h>
-- 
2.43.0

[PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Alex Bee]

Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
drm_of.h).

Explicitly include drm_atomic.h in inno_hdmi.c to fix this.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401100949.ZVRr0pIa-lkp@intel.com/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202401081720.UtgAZgba-lkp@intel.com/
Fixes: d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee <knaerzche@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
index 925320fef0a8..3bb8f1382612 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/inno_hdmi.c
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
+#include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
 #include <drm/drm_atomic_helper.h>
 #include <drm/drm_edid.h>
 #include <drm/drm_of.h>
-- 
2.43.0


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> drm_of.h).
> 
> [...]

Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime


_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> drm_of.h).
> 
> [...]

Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> drm_of.h).
> 
> [...]

Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> drm_of.h).
> 
> [...]

Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

Thanks!
Maxime


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Hi Maxime,

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > drm_of.h).
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
current merge-window?

Heiko



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Hi Maxime,

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > drm_of.h).
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
current merge-window?

Heiko

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Hi Maxime,

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > drm_of.h).
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
current merge-window?

Heiko

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Hi Maxime,

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > drm_of.h).
> > 
> > [...]
> 
> Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).

wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
current merge-window?

Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > drm_of.h).
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> 
> wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> current merge-window?

AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

Maxime

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Re: Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > drm_of.h).
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> 
> wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> current merge-window?

AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > drm_of.h).
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> 
> wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> current merge-window?

AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

Maxime

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Maxime Ripard]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 893 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > drm_of.h).
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> 
> wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> current merge-window?

AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

Maxime

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 14:47:48 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > > drm_of.h).
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> > 
> > wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> > Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> > current merge-window?
> 
> AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

ah, you're of course right. Mistook that for the one in the rk3066_hdmi
but that was fixed back in november already.

So all is well.

Heiko



_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 14:47:48 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > > drm_of.h).
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> > 
> > wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> > Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> > current merge-window?
> 
> AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

ah, you're of course right. Mistook that for the one in the rk3066_hdmi
but that was fixed back in november already.

So all is well.

Heiko

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 14:47:48 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > > drm_of.h).
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> > 
> > wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> > Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> > current merge-window?
> 
> AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

ah, you're of course right. Mistook that for the one in the rk3066_hdmi
but that was fixed back in november already.

So all is well.

Heiko

Re: (subset) [PATCH] drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Explicitly include drm_atomic.h

[Heiko Stübner]

Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 14:47:48 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Hi Maxime,
> > 
> > Am Mittwoch, 17. Januar 2024, 10:46:57 CET schrieb Maxime Ripard:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 10:24:35 +0100, Alex Bee wrote:
> > > > Commit d3e040f450ec ("drm/rockchip: inno_hdmi: Get rid of mode_set")
> > > > started using drm_atomic_get_new_connector_state and
> > > > drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state which are defined in drm_atomic.h
> > > > Building does currently only work if CONFIG_OF and CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_BRIDGE
> > > > are enabled since this will include drm_atomic.h via drm_bridge.h (see
> > > > drm_of.h).
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > 
> > > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-next).
> > 
> > wouldn't have drm-misc-next-fixes been more appropriate?
> > Because I _think_ the change causing the issue made it in during the
> > current merge-window?
> 
> AFAIK, the offending commit is in drm-misc-next only

ah, you're of course right. Mistook that for the one in the rk3066_hdmi
but that was fixed back in november already.

So all is well.

Heiko



_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel