All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
	Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
	Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
	Zhongkun He <hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com>,
	Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/vmscan: fix swappiness=max and clean up per-node proactive reclaim
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2026 10:43:22 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8336e48a-ab3a-4db9-a7f9-5bb6af2b22c3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260723171842.137e45eb36b21b3b45245da0@linux-foundation.org>



On 7/24/2026 8:18 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2026 12:57:14 +0800 Ridong <ridong.chen@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
>> Fixes and one cleanup.
>>
>> Patch 1 fixes "swappiness=max": the anon-only test in get_scan_count()
>> sat after the "cannot reclaim anon" check, so when no anon was
>> reclaimable the request fell back to SCAN_FILE and evicted page cache
>> instead.
>>
>> Patch 2 fixes reclaim_store() collapsing every error into -EAGAIN, so
>> callers can no longer tell an invalid argument from a busy interface;
>> propagate the real error code, matching the memcg path.
>>
>> Patch 3 drops the now-unused gfp_mask parameter from __node_reclaim().
>>
>> Patch 4 fixes the same "swappiness=max" issue for MGLRU.
> 
> Thanks.  AI review might have found several pre-existing issues which
> might interest the maintainers.  Also a suggestion against your [4/4]:
> 
> 	https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260723045718.2052070-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev

Hi all, sashiko review:

   This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that per-node proactive reclaim
   fails to reclaim memory if the node's unmapped file or slab pages are below
   minimum thresholds, completely ignoring anonymous memory.
   In mm/vmscan.c:__node_reclaim():
   	if (node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) > pgdat->min_unmapped_pages ||
   	    node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) > 
pgdat->min_slab_pages) {
   Does this condition incorrectly block proactive reclaim of anonymous memory
   by applying legacy zone-reclaim thresholds?
   It seems to bypass shrink_node() entirely if file/slab pages are low, even
   when sc->proactive is set, which could falsely return -EAGAIN to userspace
   for anon-heavy workloads.

Should we add:

if (sc->proactive ||
     node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) > pgdat->min_unmapped_pages ||
     node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) > pgdat->min_slab_pages) {

-- 
Best regards
Ridong


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-24  2:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-23  4:57 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/vmscan: fix swappiness=max and clean up per-node proactive reclaim Ridong
2026-07-23  4:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] mm/vmscan: fix anon-only reclaim evicting file pages when swappiness=max Ridong
2026-07-23  4:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: vmscan: propagate real error code from per-node proactive reclaim Ridong
2026-07-23  4:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: vmscan: drop unused gfp_mask parameter from __node_reclaim() Ridong
2026-07-23  4:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] mm/mglru: fix anon-only reclaim evicting file pages when swappiness=max Ridong
2026-07-23  8:57   ` Barry Song
2026-07-24  2:20     ` Ridong Chen
2026-07-24  0:18 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] mm/vmscan: fix swappiness=max and clean up per-node proactive reclaim Andrew Morton
2026-07-24  2:27   ` Ridong Chen
2026-07-24  2:43   ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-07-24 11:12     ` Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8336e48a-ab3a-4db9-a7f9-5bb6af2b22c3@linux.dev \
    --to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hezhongkun.hzk@bytedance.com \
    --cc=kasong@tencent.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=weixugc@google.com \
    --cc=yuanchu@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.