From: Juan Quintela <quintela-vTSrGsn2Cd4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: 'Arjan van de Ven'
<arjanv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Grover,
Andrew" <andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm-LL/9OlyS9hIAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
torvalds-Lhe3bsMrZseB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org,
acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] acpismp=force fix
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:42:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <863chrshay.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A66470B981205-MgY+aF+eRfZviC08c4yzC1DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org> (Len Brown's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:37:11 -0700")
>>>>> "brown," == Brown, Len <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
Hi
brown,> To disable HT on a uni-processor, wouldn't it be preferable to simply run
brown,> the UP kernel rather than the SMP kernel with HT disabled? That leaves SMP
brown,> systems, where either the BIOS could disable it (it is a BIOS bug if it
brown,> can't), or as a last resort CONFIG_X86_HT (2.5) could be config'd out of the
brown,> kernel. I guess I've talked myself into not missing "noht" also.
noht is very useful for distributions, we already have to do a lot of
kernels, any option that "mandates" to compile a different kernel is
just bad (IMHO).
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org>
To: "Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: "'Arjan van de Ven'" <arjanv@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
"Grover, Andrew" <andrew.grover@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
torvalds@transmeta.com, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BK PATCH] acpismp=force fix
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 17:42:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <863chrshay.fsf@trasno.mitica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A66470B981205@hdsmsx103.hd.intel.com> (Len Brown's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:37:11 -0700")
>>>>> "brown," == Brown, Len <len.brown@intel.com> writes:
Hi
brown,> To disable HT on a uni-processor, wouldn't it be preferable to simply run
brown,> the UP kernel rather than the SMP kernel with HT disabled? That leaves SMP
brown,> systems, where either the BIOS could disable it (it is a BIOS bug if it
brown,> can't), or as a last resort CONFIG_X86_HT (2.5) could be config'd out of the
brown,> kernel. I guess I've talked myself into not missing "noht" also.
noht is very useful for distributions, we already have to do a lot of
kernels, any option that "mandates" to compile a different kernel is
just bad (IMHO).
Later, Juan.
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-30 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-26 21:37 [BK PATCH] acpismp=force fix Brown, Len
2003-06-26 21:37 ` Brown, Len
[not found] ` <A5974D8E5F98D511BB910002A50A66470B981205-MgY+aF+eRfZviC08c4yzC1DQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-27 11:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-06-27 11:58 ` Hugh Dickins
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306271221110.1197-100000-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-27 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-06-27 11:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-06-30 15:42 ` Juan Quintela [this message]
2003-06-30 15:42 ` Juan Quintela
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-23 7:43 Grover, Andrew
2003-06-23 7:43 ` Grover, Andrew
[not found] ` <F760B14C9561B941B89469F59BA3A84725A302-sBd4vmA9Se4Lll3ZsUKC9FDQ4js95KgL@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-23 7:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-23 7:58 ` Andrew Morton
2003-06-23 8:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-06-23 8:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
[not found] ` <1056355301.1699.6.camel-PDvaWZGbcxi0rsOeZxrteAC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-23 11:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2003-06-23 11:46 ` Hugh Dickins
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0306231224590.1648-100000-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2003-06-23 11:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-06-23 11:54 ` Arjan van de Ven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=863chrshay.fsf@trasno.mitica \
--to=quintela-vtsrgsn2cd4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-LL/9OlyS9hIAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andrew.grover-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arjanv-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hugh-DTz5qymZ9yRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-Lhe3bsMrZseB+jHODAdFcQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.