From: Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Christian Bell <christian.bell@qlogic.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, izike@qumranet.com,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: Demand paging for memory regions
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:43:17 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <866658.37093.qm@web32510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802131452410.22542@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
--- Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
>
> > It seems that the need is to solve potential
> memory
> > shortage and overcommit issues by being able to
> > reclaim pages pinned by rdma driver/hardware. Is
> my
> > understanding correct?
>
> Correct.
>
> > If I do understand correctly, then why is rdma
> page
> > pinning any different than eg mlock pinning? I
> imagine
> > Oracle pins lots of memory (using mlock), how come
> > they do not run into vm overcommit issues?
>
> Mlocked pages are not pinned. They are movable by
> f.e. page migration and
> will be potentially be moved by future memory defrag
> approaches. Currently
> we have the same issues with mlocked pages as with
> pinned pages. There is
> work in progress to put mlocked pages onto a
> different lru so that reclaim
> exempts these pages and more work on limiting the
> percentage of memory
> that can be mlocked.
>
> > Are we up against some kind of breaking c-o-w
> issue
> > here that is different between mlock and rdma
> pinning?
>
> Not that I know.
>
> > Asked another way, why should effort be spent on a
> > notifier scheme, and rather not on fixing any
> memory
> > accounting problems and unifying how pin pages are
> > accounted for that get pinned via mlock() or rdma
> > drivers?
>
> There are efforts underway to account for and limit
> mlocked pages as
> described above. Page pinning the way it is done by
> Infiniband through
> increasing the page refcount is treated by the VM as
> a temporary
> condition not as a permanent pin. The VM will
> continually try to reclaim
> these pages thinking that the temporary usage of the
> page must cease
> soon. This is why the use of large amounts of pinned
> pages can lead to
> livelock situations.
Oh ok, yes, I did see the discussion on this; sorry I
missed it. I do see what notifiers bring to the table
now (without endorsing it :-)).
An orthogonal question is this: is IB/rdma the only
"culprit" that elevates page refcounts? Are there no
other subsystems which do a similar thing?
The example I am thinking about is rawio (Oracle's
mlock'ed SHM regions are handed to rawio, isn't it?).
My understanding of how rawio works in Linux is quite
dated though ...
Kanoj
>
> If we want to have pinning behavior then we could
> mark pinned pages
> specially so that the VM will not continually try to
> evict these pages. We
> could manage them similar to mlocked pages but just
> not allow page
> migration, memory unplug and defrag to occur on
> pinned memory. All of
> theses would have to fail. With the notifier scheme
> the device driver
> could be told to get rid of the pinned memory. This
> would make these 3
> techniques work despite having an RDMA memory
> section.
>
> > Startup benefits are well understood with the
> notifier
> > scheme (ie, not all pages need to be faulted in at
> > memory region creation time), specially when most
> of
> > the memory region is not accessed at all. I would
> > imagine most of HPC does not work this way though.
>
> No for optimal performance you would want to
> prefault all pages like
> it is now. The notifier scheme would only become
> relevant in memory
> shortage situations.
>
> > Then again, as rdma hardware is applied
> (increasingly?) towards apps
> > with short lived connections, the notifier scheme
> will help with startup
> > times.
>
> The main use of the notifier scheme is for stability
> and reliability. The
> "pinned" pages become unpinnable on request by the
> VM. So the VM can work
> itself out of memory shortage situations in
> cooperation with the
> RDMA logic instead of simply failing.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe
> linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on
> Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org">
> email@kvack.org </a>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Christian Bell <christian.bell@qlogic.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: Demand paging for memory regions
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:43:17 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <866658.37093.qm@web32510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802131452410.22542@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
--- Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
>
> > It seems that the need is to solve potential
> memory
> > shortage and overcommit issues by being able to
> > reclaim pages pinned by rdma driver/hardware. Is
> my
> > understanding correct?
>
> Correct.
>
> > If I do understand correctly, then why is rdma
> page
> > pinning any different than eg mlock pinning? I
> imagine
> > Oracle pins lots of memory (using mlock), how come
> > they do not run into vm overcommit issues?
>
> Mlocked pages are not pinned. They are movable by
> f.e. page migration and
> will be potentially be moved by future memory defrag
> approaches. Currently
> we have the same issues with mlocked pages as with
> pinned pages. There is
> work in progress to put mlocked pages onto a
> different lru so that reclaim
> exempts these pages and more work on limiting the
> percentage of memory
> that can be mlocked.
>
> > Are we up against some kind of breaking c-o-w
> issue
> > here that is different between mlock and rdma
> pinning?
>
> Not that I know.
>
> > Asked another way, why should effort be spent on a
> > notifier scheme, and rather not on fixing any
> memory
> > accounting problems and unifying how pin pages are
> > accounted for that get pinned via mlock() or rdma
> > drivers?
>
> There are efforts underway to account for and limit
> mlocked pages as
> described above. Page pinning the way it is done by
> Infiniband through
> increasing the page refcount is treated by the VM as
> a temporary
> condition not as a permanent pin. The VM will
> continually try to reclaim
> these pages thinking that the temporary usage of the
> page must cease
> soon. This is why the use of large amounts of pinned
> pages can lead to
> livelock situations.
Oh ok, yes, I did see the discussion on this; sorry I
missed it. I do see what notifiers bring to the table
now (without endorsing it :-)).
An orthogonal question is this: is IB/rdma the only
"culprit" that elevates page refcounts? Are there no
other subsystems which do a similar thing?
The example I am thinking about is rawio (Oracle's
mlock'ed SHM regions are handed to rawio, isn't it?).
My understanding of how rawio works in Linux is quite
dated though ...
Kanoj
>
> If we want to have pinning behavior then we could
> mark pinned pages
> specially so that the VM will not continually try to
> evict these pages. We
> could manage them similar to mlocked pages but just
> not allow page
> migration, memory unplug and defrag to occur on
> pinned memory. All of
> theses would have to fail. With the notifier scheme
> the device driver
> could be told to get rid of the pinned memory. This
> would make these 3
> techniques work despite having an RDMA memory
> section.
>
> > Startup benefits are well understood with the
> notifier
> > scheme (ie, not all pages need to be faulted in at
> > memory region creation time), specially when most
> of
> > the memory region is not accessed at all. I would
> > imagine most of HPC does not work this way though.
>
> No for optimal performance you would want to
> prefault all pages like
> it is now. The notifier scheme would only become
> relevant in memory
> shortage situations.
>
> > Then again, as rdma hardware is applied
> (increasingly?) towards apps
> > with short lived connections, the notifier scheme
> will help with startup
> > times.
>
> The main use of the notifier scheme is for stability
> and reliability. The
> "pinned" pages become unpinnable on request by the
> VM. So the VM can work
> itself out of memory shortage situations in
> cooperation with the
> RDMA logic instead of simply failing.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe
> linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on
> Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org">
> email@kvack.org </a>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kanoj Sarcar <kanojsarcar@yahoo.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Christian Bell <christian.bell@qlogic.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@qumranet.com>,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, izike@qumranet.com,
Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
steiner@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@qumranet.com,
linux-mm@kvack.org, daniel.blueman@quadrics.com,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
general@lists.openfabrics.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: Demand paging for memory regions
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:43:17 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <866658.37093.qm@web32510.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0802131452410.22542@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
--- Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Kanoj Sarcar wrote:
>
> > It seems that the need is to solve potential
> memory
> > shortage and overcommit issues by being able to
> > reclaim pages pinned by rdma driver/hardware. Is
> my
> > understanding correct?
>
> Correct.
>
> > If I do understand correctly, then why is rdma
> page
> > pinning any different than eg mlock pinning? I
> imagine
> > Oracle pins lots of memory (using mlock), how come
> > they do not run into vm overcommit issues?
>
> Mlocked pages are not pinned. They are movable by
> f.e. page migration and
> will be potentially be moved by future memory defrag
> approaches. Currently
> we have the same issues with mlocked pages as with
> pinned pages. There is
> work in progress to put mlocked pages onto a
> different lru so that reclaim
> exempts these pages and more work on limiting the
> percentage of memory
> that can be mlocked.
>
> > Are we up against some kind of breaking c-o-w
> issue
> > here that is different between mlock and rdma
> pinning?
>
> Not that I know.
>
> > Asked another way, why should effort be spent on a
> > notifier scheme, and rather not on fixing any
> memory
> > accounting problems and unifying how pin pages are
> > accounted for that get pinned via mlock() or rdma
> > drivers?
>
> There are efforts underway to account for and limit
> mlocked pages as
> described above. Page pinning the way it is done by
> Infiniband through
> increasing the page refcount is treated by the VM as
> a temporary
> condition not as a permanent pin. The VM will
> continually try to reclaim
> these pages thinking that the temporary usage of the
> page must cease
> soon. This is why the use of large amounts of pinned
> pages can lead to
> livelock situations.
Oh ok, yes, I did see the discussion on this; sorry I
missed it. I do see what notifiers bring to the table
now (without endorsing it :-)).
An orthogonal question is this: is IB/rdma the only
"culprit" that elevates page refcounts? Are there no
other subsystems which do a similar thing?
The example I am thinking about is rawio (Oracle's
mlock'ed SHM regions are handed to rawio, isn't it?).
My understanding of how rawio works in Linux is quite
dated though ...
Kanoj
>
> If we want to have pinning behavior then we could
> mark pinned pages
> specially so that the VM will not continually try to
> evict these pages. We
> could manage them similar to mlocked pages but just
> not allow page
> migration, memory unplug and defrag to occur on
> pinned memory. All of
> theses would have to fail. With the notifier scheme
> the device driver
> could be told to get rid of the pinned memory. This
> would make these 3
> techniques work despite having an RDMA memory
> section.
>
> > Startup benefits are well understood with the
> notifier
> > scheme (ie, not all pages need to be faulted in at
> > memory region creation time), specially when most
> of
> > the memory region is not accessed at all. I would
> > imagine most of HPC does not work this way though.
>
> No for optimal performance you would want to
> prefault all pages like
> it is now. The notifier scheme would only become
> relevant in memory
> shortage situations.
>
> > Then again, as rdma hardware is applied
> (increasingly?) towards apps
> > with short lived connections, the notifier scheme
> will help with startup
> > times.
>
> The main use of the notifier scheme is for stability
> and reliability. The
> "pinned" pages become unpinnable on request by the
> VM. So the VM can work
> itself out of memory shortage situations in
> cooperation with the
> RDMA logic instead of simply failing.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe
> linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on
> Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org">
> email@kvack.org </a>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-13 23:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 230+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-08 22:06 [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V6 Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 1/6] mmu_notifier: Core code Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 2/6] mmu_notifier: Callbacks to invalidate address ranges Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 3/6] mmu_notifier: invalidate_page callbacks Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 4/6] mmu_notifier: Skeleton driver for a simple mmu_notifier Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 5/6] mmu_notifier: Support for drivers with revers maps (f.e. for XPmem) Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` [patch 6/6] mmu_rmap_notifier: Skeleton for complex driver that uses its own rmaps Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 22:23 ` [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V6 Andrew Morton
2008-02-08 22:23 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-08 22:23 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-08 23:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:36 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-08 23:36 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-08 23:36 ` [ofa-general] " Robin Holt
2008-02-08 23:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:41 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-08 23:43 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-08 23:43 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-08 23:43 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-08 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-08 23:56 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-08 23:56 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-09 0:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:05 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:05 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:12 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-09 0:12 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-09 0:12 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-09 0:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:21 ` [ofa-general] trying to get of all lists R S
2008-02-09 0:22 ` [ofa-general] Re: [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V6 Roland Dreier
2008-02-09 0:22 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-09 0:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 1:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-09 1:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-09 1:24 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-09 1:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 1:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 1:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 1:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-09 1:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-09 1:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-09 2:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 2:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 2:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 12:55 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-09 12:55 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-09 12:55 ` Rik van Riel
2008-02-09 21:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 21:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 21:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-11 22:40 ` Demand paging for memory regions (was Re: MMU Notifiers V6) Roland Dreier
2008-02-11 22:40 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-11 22:40 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2008-02-12 22:01 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-12 22:01 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-12 22:01 ` [ofa-general] " Steve Wise
2008-02-12 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-12 22:10 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-12 22:10 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-12 22:41 ` [ofa-general] Re: Demand paging for memory regions Roland Dreier
2008-02-12 22:41 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-12 22:41 ` Roland Dreier
2008-02-12 23:14 ` Felix Marti
2008-02-12 23:14 ` Felix Marti
2008-02-12 23:14 ` Felix Marti
2008-02-13 0:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 0:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 0:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 15:09 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-14 15:09 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-14 15:09 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-14 15:53 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-14 15:53 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-14 16:23 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-14 16:23 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-14 16:23 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-14 17:48 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 17:48 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 17:48 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 20:47 ` David Singleton
2008-02-15 9:55 ` Robin Holt
2008-02-14 19:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 19:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 19:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 20:17 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 20:17 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 20:17 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 20:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 20:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 20:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 22:43 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 22:43 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 22:43 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-14 22:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 22:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 22:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 1:26 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 1:26 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 1:26 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 2:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 2:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 2:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 18:09 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 18:09 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 18:09 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 18:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 18:53 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 18:53 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 18:53 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 20:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 20:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 20:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 20:14 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 20:14 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 20:14 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 22:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-15 23:50 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 23:50 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-15 23:50 ` Caitlin Bestler
2008-02-12 23:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-12 23:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-12 23:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 1:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 1:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 1:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 1:45 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-13 1:45 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-13 1:45 ` Steve Wise
2008-02-13 2:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 2:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 2:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 3:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 3:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 3:56 ` Patrick Geoffray
2008-02-13 3:56 ` Patrick Geoffray
2008-02-13 4:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 4:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 4:47 ` Patrick Geoffray
2008-02-13 4:47 ` Patrick Geoffray
2008-02-13 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 18:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-13 20:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 20:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 20:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 4:09 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 4:09 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 4:09 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 19:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 19:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 19:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 19:46 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 19:46 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 20:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 22:44 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2008-02-13 22:44 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2008-02-13 22:44 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2008-02-13 23:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 23:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 23:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 23:43 ` Kanoj Sarcar [this message]
2008-02-13 23:43 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2008-02-13 23:43 ` Kanoj Sarcar
2008-02-13 23:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-02-13 23:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2008-02-13 23:48 ` [ofa-general] " Jesse Barnes
2008-02-14 0:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-14 0:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-14 0:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2008-02-14 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-14 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 23:23 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-02-13 23:23 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-02-13 23:23 ` Pete Wyckoff
2008-02-14 0:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-14 0:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2008-02-27 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-27 22:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 1:55 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 1:55 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 1:55 ` Christian Bell
2008-02-13 2:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 2:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 2:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 0:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 0:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 0:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 12:11 ` Christoph Raisch
2008-02-13 12:11 ` Christoph Raisch
2008-02-13 12:11 ` Christoph Raisch
2008-02-13 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:12 ` [patch 0/6] MMU Notifiers V6 Andrew Morton
2008-02-09 0:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-09 0:12 ` [ofa-general] " Andrew Morton
2008-02-09 0:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-02-09 0:18 ` [ofa-general] " Christoph Lameter
2008-02-13 14:31 ` Jack Steiner
2008-02-13 14:31 ` Jack Steiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=866658.37093.qm@web32510.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=kanojsarcar@yahoo.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@qumranet.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=christian.bell@qlogic.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=daniel.blueman@quadrics.com \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=izike@qumranet.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.