All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
Cc: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@gmail.com>,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: fix possible scheduling while atomic
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:40:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bnza6jpb.fsf@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1qeaFzWw-5zM2dLmBLYt-90U3Yy3iuOhoi-aUWsqcbyOBUCg@mail.gmail.com> (Andrew Bresticker's message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:21:09 -0800")

Hi,

On Sat, Jan 18 2014, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>>> There's an existing patch for that...
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg296596.html
>>>
>>> Ah, I see.  Looks like it has yet to be picked up...
>>
>> The patches aren't quite identical -- Andrew's leaves the
>> disable_irq() call in and Aisheng's removes it.  Which should I take?
>
> Since the disable_irq() is now redundant, I suppose Aisheng's is more correct

Thanks, pushed Aisheng's version to mmc-next for 3.14.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <chris@printf.net>   <http://printf.net/>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>
To: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
Cc: John Tobias <john.tobias.ph@gmail.com>,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-mmc\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dong Aisheng <b29396@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: fix possible scheduling while atomic
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:40:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86bnza6jpb.fsf@void.printf.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1qeaFzWw-5zM2dLmBLYt-90U3Yy3iuOhoi-aUWsqcbyOBUCg@mail.gmail.com> (Andrew Bresticker's message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:21:09 -0800")

Hi,

On Sat, Jan 18 2014, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
>>>> There's an existing patch for that...
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg296596.html
>>>
>>> Ah, I see.  Looks like it has yet to be picked up...
>>
>> The patches aren't quite identical -- Andrew's leaves the
>> disable_irq() call in and Aisheng's removes it.  Which should I take?
>
> Since the disable_irq() is now redundant, I suppose Aisheng's is more correct

Thanks, pushed Aisheng's version to mmc-next for 3.14.

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   <chris@printf.net>   <http://printf.net/>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-18  3:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-17 19:57 [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: fix possible scheduling while atomic Andrew Bresticker
2014-01-17 22:58 ` Philip Rakity
2014-01-17 23:10   ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-01-17 23:11   ` John Tobias
2014-01-17 23:16     ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-01-17 23:40       ` Chris Ball
2014-01-17 23:40         ` Chris Ball
2014-01-18  3:21         ` Andrew Bresticker
2014-01-18  3:40           ` Chris Ball [this message]
2014-01-18  3:40             ` Chris Ball
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-20  9:51 Philip Rakity
2014-01-20 15:03 ` Philip Rakity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86bnza6jpb.fsf@void.printf.net \
    --to=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=abrestic@chromium.org \
    --cc=b29396@freescale.com \
    --cc=john.tobias.ph@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakity@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.