All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
		Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>,
	Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
	Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:01:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86cz8srdke.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205172350.75234-4-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>

On Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:23:46 +0000,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> 
> This initial version supports (single core) CPU, dma, interrupts, timers,
> UART and SDHCI. In short - everything necessary to boot Linux on this
> system on chip.
> 
> The DT is split into rk3588 and rk3588s, which is a reduced version
> (i.e. with less peripherals) of the former.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> [rebase, squash and reword commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi  |   58 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 1672 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 1730 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ecdd2294cd42
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,1672 @@

[...]

> +	pmu-a55 {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pmu-a76 {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a76-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +	};

Two PMUs with the same PPI and no partition? This is totally
wrong. Please see how RK3399 does it, with each PMU having a PPI
partition allocated.

See the PMU binding for the details.

> +
> +	psci {
> +		compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> +		method = "smc";
> +	};
> +
> +	spll: clock-0 {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <702000000>;
> +		clock-output-names = "spll";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

You have a set of ARMv8.2 cores, which do have an interrupt for the
EL2 virtual timer. Please add this interrupt and while you're at it,
add the interrupt-names properties that are associated with them.

See the binding for the details.

[...]

> +	gic: interrupt-controller@fe600000 {
> +		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> +		reg = <0x0 0xfe600000 0 0x10000>, /* GICD */
> +		      <0x0 0xfe680000 0 0x100000>; /* GICR */
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		mbi-alias = <0x0 0xfe610000>;
> +		mbi-ranges = <424 56>;
> +		msi-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +
> +		ppi-partitions {
> +			interrupt-partition-0 {
> +				affinity = <
> +					&cpu_l0 &cpu_l1 &cpu_l2 &cpu_l3
> +					&cpu_b0 &cpu_b1 &cpu_b2 &cpu_b3
> +				>;
> +			};
> +		};

What is the purpose of having an interrupt partition that covers *all*
the CPUs? This makes zero sense. You need to:

- Bump #interrupt-cells to 4, as per the GIC binding

- Create PPI partitions to segregate the two CPU types

- Make the PMU devices use the corresponding PPI partition as per the binding

- Fix all the interrupt specifiers to use 4 cells instead of 3

Again, RK3399 got it right, and for once I'm advocating some sort of
copy/paste...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Christopher Obbard <chris.obbard@collabora.com>,
	Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@collabora.com,
	Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>,
	Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
	Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 3/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2022 12:01:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86cz8srdke.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205172350.75234-4-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>

On Mon, 05 Dec 2022 17:23:46 +0000,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> 
> This initial version supports (single core) CPU, dma, interrupts, timers,
> UART and SDHCI. In short - everything necessary to boot Linux on this
> system on chip.
> 
> The DT is split into rk3588 and rk3588s, which is a reduced version
> (i.e. with less peripherals) of the former.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
> [rebase, squash and reword commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi  |   58 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 1672 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 1730 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ecdd2294cd42
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,1672 @@

[...]

> +	pmu-a55 {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a55-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +	};
> +
> +	pmu-a76 {
> +		compatible = "arm,cortex-a76-pmu";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 7 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +	};

Two PMUs with the same PPI and no partition? This is totally
wrong. Please see how RK3399 does it, with each PMU having a PPI
partition allocated.

See the PMU binding for the details.

> +
> +	psci {
> +		compatible = "arm,psci-1.0";
> +		method = "smc";
> +	};
> +
> +	spll: clock-0 {
> +		compatible = "fixed-clock";
> +		clock-frequency = <702000000>;
> +		clock-output-names = "spll";
> +		#clock-cells = <0>;
> +	};
> +
> +	timer {
> +		compatible = "arm,armv8-timer";
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 14 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +			     <GIC_PPI 10 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

You have a set of ARMv8.2 cores, which do have an interrupt for the
EL2 virtual timer. Please add this interrupt and while you're at it,
add the interrupt-names properties that are associated with them.

See the binding for the details.

[...]

> +	gic: interrupt-controller@fe600000 {
> +		compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> +		reg = <0x0 0xfe600000 0 0x10000>, /* GICD */
> +		      <0x0 0xfe680000 0 0x100000>; /* GICR */
> +		interrupts = <GIC_PPI 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +		interrupt-controller;
> +		mbi-alias = <0x0 0xfe610000>;
> +		mbi-ranges = <424 56>;
> +		msi-controller;
> +		#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> +
> +		ppi-partitions {
> +			interrupt-partition-0 {
> +				affinity = <
> +					&cpu_l0 &cpu_l1 &cpu_l2 &cpu_l3
> +					&cpu_b0 &cpu_b1 &cpu_b2 &cpu_b3
> +				>;
> +			};
> +		};

What is the purpose of having an interrupt partition that covers *all*
the CPUs? This makes zero sense. You need to:

- Bump #interrupt-cells to 4, as per the GIC binding

- Create PPI partitions to segregate the two CPU types

- Make the PMU devices use the corresponding PPI partition as per the binding

- Fix all the interrupt specifiers to use 4 cells instead of 3

Again, RK3399 got it right, and for once I'm advocating some sort of
copy/paste...

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-09 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-05 17:23 [PATCHv5 0/7] Initial rk3588 DT Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 1/7] dt-bindings: soc: rockchip: add initial rk3588 syscon compatibles Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 2/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588 pinctrl data Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 3/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-09 12:01   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-12-09 12:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 4/7] dt-bindings: arm: rockchip: add initial rk3588 boards Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 5/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588-evb1 board Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 6/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5a board Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23 ` [PATCHv5 7/7] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rock-5b board Sebastian Reichel
2022-12-05 17:23   ` Sebastian Reichel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86cz8srdke.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
    --cc=chris.obbard@collabora.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
    --cc=sugar.zhang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=yifeng.zhao@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.