* [cocci] GNU-style function calls
@ 2026-07-06 17:50 Arsen Arsenović
2026-07-06 18:26 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Arsen Arsenović @ 2026-07-06 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cocci
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1025 bytes --]
Hi!
I work on GCC, meaning we use GNU-style function calls, where the
call operator is preceded by a whitespace, like so:
foo (a, b);
I've had decent luck with applying Cocci to the codebase, but if Cocci
rewrites a call, it removes the whitespace preceding the call operator:
/tmp$ cat test.cc
void
thing ()
{
foo (a, b);
}
/tmp$ cat test.cocci
@@
expression x, y;
@@
- foo (x, y);
+ foo (y, x);
/tmp$ spatch --sp-file test.cocci --c++=14 test.cc
init_defs_builtins: /usr/lib64/coccinelle/standard.h
HANDLING: test.cc
diff =
--- test.cc
+++ /tmp/cocci-output-157607-636042-test.cc
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
void
thing ()
{
- foo (a, b);
+ foo(b, a);
}
/tmp$
This isn't too much of a problem; I go back and modify the function
calls manually, but it would be nice if Cocci handled it.
Is it possible to keep the spaces in line with the code style w/ Cocci?
Thanks in advance! Have a lovely day.
--
Arsen Arsenović
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 430 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [cocci] GNU-style function calls
2026-07-06 17:50 [cocci] GNU-style function calls Arsen Arsenović
@ 2026-07-06 18:26 ` Julia Lawall
2026-07-06 18:35 ` Arsen Arsenović
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2026-07-06 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arsen Arsenović; +Cc: cocci
There is a —simple-spacing argument where it should preserve the spacing you put in the semantic patch.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 6 Jul 2026, at 13:50, Arsen Arsenović <aarsenovic@baylibre.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I work on GCC, meaning we use GNU-style function calls, where the
> call operator is preceded by a whitespace, like so:
>
> foo (a, b);
>
> I've had decent luck with applying Cocci to the codebase, but if Cocci
> rewrites a call, it removes the whitespace preceding the call operator:
>
> /tmp$ cat test.cc
> void
> thing ()
> {
> foo (a, b);
> }
> /tmp$ cat test.cocci
> @@
> expression x, y;
> @@
>
> - foo (x, y);
> + foo (y, x);
> /tmp$ spatch --sp-file test.cocci --c++=14 test.cc
> init_defs_builtins: /usr/lib64/coccinelle/standard.h
> HANDLING: test.cc
> diff =
> --- test.cc
> +++ /tmp/cocci-output-157607-636042-test.cc
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> void
> thing ()
> {
> - foo (a, b);
> + foo(b, a);
> }
> /tmp$
>
> This isn't too much of a problem; I go back and modify the function
> calls manually, but it would be nice if Cocci handled it.
>
> Is it possible to keep the spaces in line with the code style w/ Cocci?
>
> Thanks in advance! Have a lovely day.
> --
> Arsen Arsenović
> <signature.asc>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-06 18:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-06 17:50 [cocci] GNU-style function calls Arsen Arsenović
2026-07-06 18:26 ` Julia Lawall
2026-07-06 18:35 ` Arsen Arsenović
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.