From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Drop support for VPIPT i-cache policy
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 18:26:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86h6kxbz8u.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZW3l6Bq7ortEGB8I@FVFF77S0Q05N>
On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 14:44:56 +0000,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:36:03PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > ARMv8.2 introduced support for VPIPT i-caches, the V standing for
> > VMID-tagged. Although this looked like a reasonable idea, no
> > implementation has ever made it into the wild.
> >
> > Linux has supported this for over 6 years (amusingly, just as the
> > architecture was dropping support for AIVIVT i-caches), but we had no
> > way to even test it, and it is likely that this code was just
> > bit-rotting.
> >
> > However, in a recent breakthrough (XML drop 2023-09, tagged as
> > d55f5af8e09052abe92a02adf820deea2eaed717), the architecture has
> > finally been purged of this option, making VIPT and PIPT the only two
> > valid options.
> >
> > This really means this code is just dead code. Nobody will ever come
> > up with such an implementation, and we can just get rid of it.
> >
> > Most of the impact is on KVM, where we drop a few large comment blocks
> > (and a bit of code), while the core arch code loses the detection code
> > itself.
> >
> > * From v2:
> > - Fix reserved naming for RESERVED_AIVIVT
> > - Collected RBs from Anshuman an Zenghui
> >
> > Marc Zyngier (3):
> > KVM: arm64: Remove VPIPT I-cache handling
> > arm64: Kill detection of VPIPT i-cache policy
> > arm64: Rename reserved values for CTR_EL0.L1Ip
>
> For the series:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks.
> Looking forward, we can/should probably replace __icache_flags with a single
> ICACHE_NOALIASING or ICACHE_PIPT cpucap, which'd get rid of a bunch of
> duplicated logic and make that more sound in the case of races around cpu
> onlining.
As long as we refuse VIPT CPUs coming up late (i.e. after we have
patched the kernel to set ICACHE_PIPT), it should be doable. I guess
we already have this restriction as userspace is able to probe the
I-cache policy anyway.
How about the patch below (tested in a guest with a bunch of hacks to
expose different L1Ip values)?
Thanks,
M.
From 8f88afb0b317213dcbf18ea460a508bfccc18568 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:09:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Make icache detection a cpu capability
Now that we only have two icache policies, we are in a good position
to make the whole detection business more robust.
Let's replace __icache_flags by a single capability (ICACHE_PIPT),
and use this if all CPUs are indeed PIPT. It means we can rely on
existing logic to mandate that a VIPT CPU coming up late will be
denied booting, which is the safe thing to do.
This also leads to some nice cleanups in pKVM, and KVM as a whole
can use ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT as a final cap.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h | 9 ++-------
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 1 -
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 7 +++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 34 --------------------------------
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 3 ---
arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 2 +-
9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
index 06a4670bdb0b..8ef9522a6151 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/kasan-enabled.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/mte-def.h>
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
@@ -55,18 +55,13 @@ static inline unsigned int arch_slab_minalign(void)
#define arch_slab_minalign() arch_slab_minalign()
#endif
-#define CTR_L1IP(ctr) SYS_FIELD_GET(CTR_EL0, L1Ip, ctr)
-
-#define ICACHEF_ALIASING 0
-extern unsigned long __icache_flags;
-
/*
* Whilst the D-side always behaves as PIPT on AArch64, aliasing is
* permitted in the I-cache.
*/
static inline int icache_is_aliasing(void)
{
- return test_bit(ICACHEF_ALIASING, &__icache_flags);
+ return !cpus_have_cap(ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT);
}
static inline u32 cache_type_cwg(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index 145ce73fc16c..7ad70f9865fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr1_el1_sys_val);
extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr2_el1_sys_val);
extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64smfr0_el1_sys_val);
-extern unsigned long kvm_nvhe_sym(__icache_flags);
extern unsigned int kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_vmid_bits);
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HYP_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
index e3e793d0ec30..ab86c2f025cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static inline void __invalidate_icache_guest_page(void *va, size_t size)
* invalidation range exceeds our arbitrary limit on invadations by
* cache line.
*/
- if (icache_is_aliasing() || size > __invalidate_icache_max_range())
+ if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT) || size > __invalidate_icache_max_range())
icache_inval_all_pou();
else
icache_inval_pou((unsigned long)va, (unsigned long)va + size);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 646591c67e7a..73a37176676e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2272,6 +2272,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
.matches = has_always,
},
+ {
+ .desc = "PIPT I-cache policy",
+ .capability = ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT,
+ .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+ .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
+ ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(CTR_EL0, L1Ip, PIPT)
+ },
{
.desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
.capability = ARM64_HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 47043c0d95ec..a4ea331fb6d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -33,20 +33,6 @@
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuinfo_arm64, cpu_data);
static struct cpuinfo_arm64 boot_cpu_data;
-static inline const char *icache_policy_str(int l1ip)
-{
- switch (l1ip) {
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_VIPT:
- return "VIPT";
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_PIPT:
- return "PIPT";
- default:
- return "RESERVED/UNKNOWN";
- }
-}
-
-unsigned long __icache_flags;
-
static const char *const hwcap_str[] = {
[KERNEL_HWCAP_FP] = "fp",
[KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMD] = "asimd",
@@ -378,24 +364,6 @@ static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
}
device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
-static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
-{
- unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- u32 l1ip = CTR_L1IP(info->reg_ctr);
-
- switch (l1ip) {
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_PIPT:
- break;
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_VIPT:
- default:
- /* Assume aliasing */
- set_bit(ICACHEF_ALIASING, &__icache_flags);
- break;
- }
-
- pr_info("Detected %s I-cache on CPU%d\n", icache_policy_str(l1ip), cpu);
-}
-
static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info)
{
info->reg_id_dfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_DFR0_EL1);
@@ -457,8 +425,6 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
__cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(&info->aarch32);
-
- cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(info);
}
void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index e5f75f1f1085..a5f71165cd5c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -2242,7 +2242,6 @@ static void kvm_hyp_init_symbols(void)
kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr1_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1);
kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr2_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1);
kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64smfr0_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1);
- kvm_nvhe_sym(__icache_flags) = __icache_flags;
kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_vmid_bits) = kvm_arm_vmid_bits;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
index b29f15418c0a..187ce5720697 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -12,9 +12,6 @@
#include <nvhe/pkvm.h>
#include <nvhe/trap_handler.h>
-/* Used by icache_is_aliasing(). */
-unsigned long __icache_flags;
-
/* Used by kvm_get_vttbr(). */
unsigned int kvm_arm_vmid_bits;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
index b98c38288a9d..9c6313cd6f5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ HAS_TLB_RANGE
HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
HAS_WFXT
HW_DBM
+ICACHE_PIPT
KVM_HVHE
KVM_PROTECTED_MODE
MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index c5af75b23187..db8c96841138 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ Field 28 IDC
Field 27:24 CWG
Field 23:20 ERG
Field 19:16 DminLine
-Enum 15:14 L1Ip
+UnsignedEnum 15:14 L1Ip
# This was named as VPIPT in the ARM but now documented as reserved
0b00 RESERVED_VPIPT
# This is named as AIVIVT in the ARM but documented as reserved
--
2.39.2
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Drop support for VPIPT i-cache policy
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2023 18:26:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86h6kxbz8u.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZW3l6Bq7ortEGB8I@FVFF77S0Q05N>
On Mon, 04 Dec 2023 14:44:56 +0000,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 02:36:03PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > ARMv8.2 introduced support for VPIPT i-caches, the V standing for
> > VMID-tagged. Although this looked like a reasonable idea, no
> > implementation has ever made it into the wild.
> >
> > Linux has supported this for over 6 years (amusingly, just as the
> > architecture was dropping support for AIVIVT i-caches), but we had no
> > way to even test it, and it is likely that this code was just
> > bit-rotting.
> >
> > However, in a recent breakthrough (XML drop 2023-09, tagged as
> > d55f5af8e09052abe92a02adf820deea2eaed717), the architecture has
> > finally been purged of this option, making VIPT and PIPT the only two
> > valid options.
> >
> > This really means this code is just dead code. Nobody will ever come
> > up with such an implementation, and we can just get rid of it.
> >
> > Most of the impact is on KVM, where we drop a few large comment blocks
> > (and a bit of code), while the core arch code loses the detection code
> > itself.
> >
> > * From v2:
> > - Fix reserved naming for RESERVED_AIVIVT
> > - Collected RBs from Anshuman an Zenghui
> >
> > Marc Zyngier (3):
> > KVM: arm64: Remove VPIPT I-cache handling
> > arm64: Kill detection of VPIPT i-cache policy
> > arm64: Rename reserved values for CTR_EL0.L1Ip
>
> For the series:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks.
> Looking forward, we can/should probably replace __icache_flags with a single
> ICACHE_NOALIASING or ICACHE_PIPT cpucap, which'd get rid of a bunch of
> duplicated logic and make that more sound in the case of races around cpu
> onlining.
As long as we refuse VIPT CPUs coming up late (i.e. after we have
patched the kernel to set ICACHE_PIPT), it should be doable. I guess
we already have this restriction as userspace is able to probe the
I-cache policy anyway.
How about the patch below (tested in a guest with a bunch of hacks to
expose different L1Ip values)?
Thanks,
M.
From 8f88afb0b317213dcbf18ea460a508bfccc18568 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2023 18:09:40 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Make icache detection a cpu capability
Now that we only have two icache policies, we are in a good position
to make the whole detection business more robust.
Let's replace __icache_flags by a single capability (ICACHE_PIPT),
and use this if all CPUs are indeed PIPT. It means we can rely on
existing logic to mandate that a VIPT CPU coming up late will be
denied booting, which is the safe thing to do.
This also leads to some nice cleanups in pKVM, and KVM as a whole
can use ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT as a final cap.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h | 9 ++-------
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h | 1 -
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 7 +++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 34 --------------------------------
arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 1 -
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c | 3 ---
arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 2 +-
9 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
index 06a4670bdb0b..8ef9522a6151 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cache.h
@@ -37,9 +37,9 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/kasan-enabled.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/mte-def.h>
#include <asm/sysreg.h>
@@ -55,18 +55,13 @@ static inline unsigned int arch_slab_minalign(void)
#define arch_slab_minalign() arch_slab_minalign()
#endif
-#define CTR_L1IP(ctr) SYS_FIELD_GET(CTR_EL0, L1Ip, ctr)
-
-#define ICACHEF_ALIASING 0
-extern unsigned long __icache_flags;
-
/*
* Whilst the D-side always behaves as PIPT on AArch64, aliasing is
* permitted in the I-cache.
*/
static inline int icache_is_aliasing(void)
{
- return test_bit(ICACHEF_ALIASING, &__icache_flags);
+ return !cpus_have_cap(ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT);
}
static inline u32 cache_type_cwg(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
index 145ce73fc16c..7ad70f9865fd 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_hyp.h
@@ -140,7 +140,6 @@ extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr1_el1_sys_val);
extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr2_el1_sys_val);
extern u64 kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64smfr0_el1_sys_val);
-extern unsigned long kvm_nvhe_sym(__icache_flags);
extern unsigned int kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_vmid_bits);
#endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HYP_H__ */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
index e3e793d0ec30..ab86c2f025cf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ static inline void __invalidate_icache_guest_page(void *va, size_t size)
* invalidation range exceeds our arbitrary limit on invadations by
* cache line.
*/
- if (icache_is_aliasing() || size > __invalidate_icache_max_range())
+ if (!cpus_have_final_cap(ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT) || size > __invalidate_icache_max_range())
icache_inval_all_pou();
else
icache_inval_pou((unsigned long)va, (unsigned long)va + size);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 646591c67e7a..73a37176676e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2272,6 +2272,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
.matches = has_always,
},
+ {
+ .desc = "PIPT I-cache policy",
+ .capability = ARM64_ICACHE_PIPT,
+ .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
+ .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
+ ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(CTR_EL0, L1Ip, PIPT)
+ },
{
.desc = "GIC system register CPU interface",
.capability = ARM64_HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS,
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
index 47043c0d95ec..a4ea331fb6d4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
@@ -33,20 +33,6 @@
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpuinfo_arm64, cpu_data);
static struct cpuinfo_arm64 boot_cpu_data;
-static inline const char *icache_policy_str(int l1ip)
-{
- switch (l1ip) {
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_VIPT:
- return "VIPT";
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_PIPT:
- return "PIPT";
- default:
- return "RESERVED/UNKNOWN";
- }
-}
-
-unsigned long __icache_flags;
-
static const char *const hwcap_str[] = {
[KERNEL_HWCAP_FP] = "fp",
[KERNEL_HWCAP_ASIMD] = "asimd",
@@ -378,24 +364,6 @@ static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
}
device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
-static void cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
-{
- unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
- u32 l1ip = CTR_L1IP(info->reg_ctr);
-
- switch (l1ip) {
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_PIPT:
- break;
- case CTR_EL0_L1Ip_VIPT:
- default:
- /* Assume aliasing */
- set_bit(ICACHEF_ALIASING, &__icache_flags);
- break;
- }
-
- pr_info("Detected %s I-cache on CPU%d\n", icache_policy_str(l1ip), cpu);
-}
-
static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(struct cpuinfo_32bit *info)
{
info->reg_id_dfr0 = read_cpuid(ID_DFR0_EL1);
@@ -457,8 +425,6 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
if (id_aa64pfr0_32bit_el0(info->reg_id_aa64pfr0))
__cpuinfo_store_cpu_32bit(&info->aarch32);
-
- cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(info);
}
void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index e5f75f1f1085..a5f71165cd5c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -2242,7 +2242,6 @@ static void kvm_hyp_init_symbols(void)
kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr1_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR1_EL1);
kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64mmfr2_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR2_EL1);
kvm_nvhe_sym(id_aa64smfr0_el1_sys_val) = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64SMFR0_EL1);
- kvm_nvhe_sym(__icache_flags) = __icache_flags;
kvm_nvhe_sym(kvm_arm_vmid_bits) = kvm_arm_vmid_bits;
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
index b29f15418c0a..187ce5720697 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/pkvm.c
@@ -12,9 +12,6 @@
#include <nvhe/pkvm.h>
#include <nvhe/trap_handler.h>
-/* Used by icache_is_aliasing(). */
-unsigned long __icache_flags;
-
/* Used by kvm_get_vttbr(). */
unsigned int kvm_arm_vmid_bits;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
index b98c38288a9d..9c6313cd6f5e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
@@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ HAS_TLB_RANGE
HAS_VIRT_HOST_EXTN
HAS_WFXT
HW_DBM
+ICACHE_PIPT
KVM_HVHE
KVM_PROTECTED_MODE
MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index c5af75b23187..db8c96841138 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@ Field 28 IDC
Field 27:24 CWG
Field 23:20 ERG
Field 19:16 DminLine
-Enum 15:14 L1Ip
+UnsignedEnum 15:14 L1Ip
# This was named as VPIPT in the ARM but now documented as reserved
0b00 RESERVED_VPIPT
# This is named as AIVIVT in the ARM but documented as reserved
--
2.39.2
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-04 18:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-04 14:36 [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Drop support for VPIPT i-cache policy Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: arm64: Remove VPIPT I-cache handling Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] arm64: Kill detection of VPIPT i-cache policy Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: Rename reserved values for CTR_EL0.L1Ip Marc Zyngier
2023-12-04 14:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 2:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-12-05 2:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-12-04 14:44 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] arm64: Drop support for VPIPT i-cache policy Mark Rutland
2023-12-04 14:44 ` Mark Rutland
2023-12-04 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-12-04 18:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 11:03 ` Mark Rutland
2023-12-05 11:03 ` Mark Rutland
2023-12-05 11:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 11:53 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-12-05 15:16 ` Will Deacon
2023-12-05 15:16 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86h6kxbz8u.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.