From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:15:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86jzs2ofqs.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZR03liCodnTQWs7s@FVFF77S0Q05N>
On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:59:50 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Given you haven't seen any issues, I suspect those are getting reset to fixed
> values that happens to work out for us, but it is a bit worrisome more
> generally (e.g. the LPI case above).
It is likely that these SoCs don't even have an ITS.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:15:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86jzs2ofqs.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZR03liCodnTQWs7s@FVFF77S0Q05N>
On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:59:50 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Given you haven't seen any issues, I suspect those are getting reset to fixed
> values that happens to work out for us, but it is a bit worrisome more
> generally (e.g. the LPI case above).
It is likely that these SoCs don't even have an ITS.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-02 16:45 [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 16:45 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: smp: Don't directly call arch_smp_send_reschedule() for wakeup Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 16:45 ` Douglas Anderson
2023-10-02 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 17:25 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 17:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 17:24 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-02 19:16 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-02 19:16 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 12:29 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 12:29 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 13:43 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 13:43 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 16:32 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 16:32 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-03 19:32 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-03 19:32 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-04 9:59 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-04 9:59 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-04 10:15 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2023-10-04 10:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-04 14:04 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-04 14:04 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-05 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-05 10:27 ` Mark Rutland
2023-10-05 15:34 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-05 15:34 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06 12:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-06 12:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2023-10-06 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 10:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 22:17 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06 22:17 ` Doug Anderson
2023-10-06 9:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 9:55 ` Marc Zyngier
2023-10-06 10:20 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2023-10-06 10:20 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86jzs2ofqs.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=wenst@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.