[PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: arm64: Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs()

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 18:40:20 +0000,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> wrote:
> 
> Use kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of
> CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL. The two mechanisms solve the same
> problem, allowing architecture-specific code to provide a non-IPI
> implementation of remote TLB flushing.
> 
> Dropping CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL allows KVM to standardize
> all architectures on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() instead of maintaining
> two mechanisms.
> 
> Opt to standardize on kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() since it avoids
> duplicating the generic TLB stats across architectures that implement
> their own remote TLB flush.
> 
> This adds an extra function call to the ARM64 kvm_flush_remote_tlbs()
> path, but that is a small cost in comparison to flushing remote TLBs.
> 
> No functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig            | 1 -
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c              | 6 +++---
>  virt/kvm/Kconfig                  | 3 ---
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c               | 2 --
>  5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 113e20fdbb56..062800f1dc54 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -998,6 +998,9 @@ int __init kvm_set_ipa_limit(void);
>  #define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_VM_ALLOC
>  struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void);
>  
> +#define __KVM_HAVE_ARCH_FLUSH_REMOTE_TLBS
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
> +
>  static inline bool kvm_vm_is_protected(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	return false;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index ca6eadeb7d1a..e9ac57098a0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ menuconfig KVM
>  	select MMU_NOTIFIER
>  	select PREEMPT_NOTIFIERS
>  	select HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
> -	select HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL
>  	select KVM_MMIO
>  	select KVM_GENERIC_DIRTYLOG_READ_PROTECT
>  	select KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 01352f5838a0..8840f65e0e40 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -80,15 +80,15 @@ static bool memslot_is_logging(struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8
> + * kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs() - flush all VM TLB entries for v7/8
>   * @kvm:	pointer to kvm structure.
>   *
>   * Interface to HYP function to flush all VM TLB entries
>   */
> -void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> +int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
> -	++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush_requests;
>  	kvm_call_hyp(__kvm_tlb_flush_vmid, &kvm->arch.mmu);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static bool kvm_is_device_pfn(unsigned long pfn)
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/Kconfig b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> index b74916de5183..484d0873061c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/virt/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ config HAVE_KVM_CPU_RELAX_INTERCEPT
>  config KVM_VFIO
>         bool
>  
> -config HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL
> -       bool
> -
>  config HAVE_KVM_INVALID_WAKEUPS
>         bool
>  
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 277507463678..fefd3e3c8fe1 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -347,7 +347,6 @@ bool kvm_make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_make_all_cpus_request);
>  
> -#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_TLB_FLUSH_ALL
>  void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
>  {
>  	++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush_requests;
> @@ -368,7 +367,6 @@ void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
>  		++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush;
>  }

For context, we currently have this:

	if (!kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(kvm)
	    || kvm_make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH))
		++kvm->stat.generic.remote_tlb_flush;

Is there any reason why we shouldn't move the KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH call
into the arch-specific helpers? This is architecture specific, even if
the majority of the supported architecture cannot do broadcast
invalidation like arm64 does.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.