From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
Cc: oupton@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, vdonnefort@google.com, qperret@google.com,
tabba@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Reject the stage-2 MMU pointer hypercalls under pKVM
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 10:24:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86zexi6f4x.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260914174521.832575-1-fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2026 18:45:21 +0100,
Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> The five hypercalls that take a struct kvm_s2_mmu pointer remain
> callable after pKVM finalises, and each dereferences the host pointer
> in __load_stage2(). Under pKVM none of them has a valid caller: the
> host walks no guest stage-2, its TLB flushes go through the handle-based
> __pkvm_tlb_flush_vmid, and kvm_arch_vcpu_load() skips the CPU context
> flush.
>
> Reject all five when protected mode is enabled.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260914130152.F0D5F1F000FF@smtp.kernel.org/
> Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>
> ---
>
> Notes:
> No in-tree host path reaches these, so no Fixes: tag.
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> index 9a3b92e626adb..4b0d00e55e2ea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/nvhe/hyp-main.c
> @@ -557,6 +557,9 @@ static void handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, ipa, host_ctxt, 2);
> DECLARE_REG(int, level, host_ctxt, 3);
>
> + if (unlikely(is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
> + return;
> +
> __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa(kern_hyp_va(mmu), ipa, level);
> }
>
> @@ -566,6 +569,9 @@ static void handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctx
> DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, ipa, host_ctxt, 2);
> DECLARE_REG(int, level, host_ctxt, 3);
>
> + if (unlikely(is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
> + return;
> +
> __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh(kern_hyp_va(mmu), ipa, level);
> }
>
> @@ -576,6 +582,9 @@ handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> DECLARE_REG(phys_addr_t, start, host_ctxt, 2);
> DECLARE_REG(unsigned long, pages, host_ctxt, 3);
>
> + if (unlikely(is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
> + return;
> +
> __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range(kern_hyp_va(mmu), start, pages);
> }
>
> @@ -583,6 +592,9 @@ static void handle___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> {
> DECLARE_REG(struct kvm_s2_mmu *, mmu, host_ctxt, 1);
>
> + if (unlikely(is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
> + return;
> +
> __kvm_tlb_flush_vmid(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
> }
>
> @@ -602,6 +614,9 @@ static void handle___kvm_flush_cpu_context(struct kvm_cpu_context *host_ctxt)
> {
> DECLARE_REG(struct kvm_s2_mmu *, mmu, host_ctxt, 1);
>
> + if (unlikely(is_protected_kvm_enabled()))
> + return;
> +
> __kvm_flush_cpu_context(kern_hyp_va(mmu));
> }
>
Anf why not __kvm_flush_vm_context()? It doesn't take a S2 MMU
pointer, but it is still logically wrong to let this being called.
And the whole sprinkling of guards like this is just horrible. We
already have a filtering mechanism, just make use of it:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
index bffdeb36da1d2..51bf30b671fe4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h
@@ -62,6 +62,11 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_enable_ssbs,
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_init_lrs,
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___vgic_v3_get_gic_config,
+ __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context,
+ __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa,
+ __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh,
+ __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid,
+ __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range,
MARKER(__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC_MIN_PKVM),
@@ -70,11 +75,6 @@ enum __kvm_host_smccc_func {
/* Hypercalls that are always available and common to [nh]VHE/pKVM. */
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_adjust_pc,
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_vcpu_run,
- __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_vm_context,
- __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa,
- __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_ipa_nsh,
- __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid,
- __KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_tlb_flush_vmid_range,
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_flush_cpu_context,
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___kvm_timer_set_cntvoff,
__KVM_HOST_SMCCC_FUNC___tracing_load,
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-15 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 17:45 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Reject the stage-2 MMU pointer hypercalls under pKVM Fuad Tabba
2026-09-14 17:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 18:11 ` Fuad Tabba
2026-09-15 9:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-09-15 9:24 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-09-15 9:30 ` Fuad Tabba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86zexi6f4x.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=vdonnefort@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.