All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for ilk+ pfit registers
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 18:29:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871qkfzy89.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230418175528.13117-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, 18 Apr 2023, Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
>
> Polish the ilk+ pfit registers with REG_BIT() & co., and
> also take the opportunity to unify the ivb/hsw vs. not checks
> in ilk_pfit_enable() and ilk_get_pfit_config().
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c |  9 +++++++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h              | 20 ++++++++++----------
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index ea1b0e87ae35..e9000ed15e7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -3230,11 +3230,17 @@ static void ilk_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
>  	u32 ctl, pos, size;
> +	enum pipe pipe;
>  
>  	ctl = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PF_CTL(crtc->pipe));
>  	if ((ctl & PF_ENABLE) == 0)
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (IS_IVYBRIDGE(dev_priv) || IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
> +		pipe = REG_FIELD_GET(PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB, ctl);
> +	else
> +		pipe = crtc->pipe;
> +
>  	crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled = true;
>  
>  	pos = intel_de_read(dev_priv, PF_WIN_POS(crtc->pipe));
> @@ -3249,8 +3255,7 @@ static void ilk_get_pfit_config(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  	 * ivb/hsw (since we don't use the higher upscaling modes which
>  	 * differentiates them) so just WARN about this case for now.
>  	 */
> -	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 7 &&
> -		    (ctl & PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB) != PF_PIPE_SEL_IVB(crtc->pipe));
> +	drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, pipe != crtc->pipe);
>  }
>  
>  static bool ilk_get_pipe_config(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index eea739e0b48a..3c02f6c70733 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4008,16 +4008,16 @@
>  
>  /* CPU panel fitter */
>  /* IVB+ has 3 fitters, 0 is 7x5 capable, the other two only 3x3 */
> -#define _PFA_CTL_1               0x68080
> -#define _PFB_CTL_1               0x68880
> -#define  PF_ENABLE              (1 << 31)
> -#define  PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB	(3 << 29)
> -#define  PF_PIPE_SEL_IVB(pipe)	((pipe) << 29)
> -#define  PF_FILTER_MASK		(3 << 23)
> -#define  PF_FILTER_PROGRAMMED	(0 << 23)
> -#define  PF_FILTER_MED_3x3	(1 << 23)
> -#define  PF_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE	(2 << 23)
> -#define  PF_FILTER_EDGE_SOFTEN	(3 << 23)
> +#define _PFA_CTL_1		0x68080
> +#define _PFB_CTL_1		0x68880
> +#define   PF_ENABLE			REG_BIT(31)
> +#define   PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB		REG_GENMASK(30, 29) /* ivb/hsw */
> +#define   PF_PIPE_SEL_IVB(pipe)		REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_PIPE_SEL_MASK_IVB, (pipe))
> +#define   PF_FILTER_MASK		REG_GENMASK(24, 23)
> +#define   PF_FILTER_PROGRAMMED		REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_MASK, 0)
> +#define   PF_FILTER_MED_3x3		REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_MASK, 1)
> +#define   PF_FILTER_EDGE_ENHANCE	REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_EDGE_MASK, 2)
> +#define   PF_FILTER_EDGE_SOFTEN		REG_FIELD_PREP(PF_FILTER_EDGE_MASK, 3)
>  #define _PFA_WIN_SZ		0x68074
>  #define _PFB_WIN_SZ		0x68874
>  #define _PFA_WIN_POS		0x68070

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-19 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-18 17:55 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/15] drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/15] drm/i915: Check pipe source size when using skl+ scalers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 17:55   ` Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:11   ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/15] drm/i915: Relocate VBLANK_EVASION_TIME_US Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:13   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/15] drm/i915: Relocate intel_atomic_setup_scalers() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:16   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/15] drm/i915: Relocate skl_get_pfit_config() Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:17   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co for the pre-ilk pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/15] drm/i915: Namespace pfit registers properly Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:28   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for ilk+ pfit registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:29   ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/15] drm/i915: Drop a useless forward declararion Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:30   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for ilk pfit window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:34   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-20 12:09     ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-25 10:49       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/15] drm/i915: Remove dead scaler register defines Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:35   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: Rename skl+ scaler binding bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 19:36   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 " Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38     ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 22:06   ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH " kernel test robot
2023-04-19 15:38   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 12/15] drm/i915: s/PS_COEE_INDEX_AUTO_INC/PS_COEF_INDEX_AUTO_INC/ Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:38   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 13/15] drm/i915: Define bitmasks for sik+ scaler window pos/size Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:41   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 14/15] drm/i915: Use REG_BIT() & co. for pipe scaler registers Ville Syrjala
2023-04-19 15:48   ` Jani Nikula
2023-04-18 17:55 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 15/15] drm/i915: Define more PS_CTRL bits Ville Syrjala
2023-04-18 18:31 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Scaler/pfit stuff (rev2) Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:20 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-04-18 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-04-19  4:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871qkfzy89.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.