From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, oleg@redhat.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
mingo@kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
kernel-team@fb.com, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 10:25:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160153665673.4398.6268028176406103680@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting paulmck@kernel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58)
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be
>> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so.
>
> Change looks fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>
> Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree?
>
> If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is
> it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed
> for 5.10 at week of -rc5.
If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches.
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 10:25:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160153665673.4398.6268028176406103680@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting paulmck@kernel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58)
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be
>> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so.
>
> Change looks fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>
> Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree?
>
> If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is
> it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed
> for 5.10 at week of -rc5.
If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches.
Thanks,
tglx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
paulmck@kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, oleg@redhat.com,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
mingo@kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
kernel-team@fb.com, "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, josh@joshtriplett.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 10:25:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160153665673.4398.6268028176406103680@jlahtine-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Oct 01 2020 at 10:17, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> Quoting paulmck@kernel.org (2020-09-29 02:30:58)
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is now unconditionally enabled and will be
>> removed. Cleanup the leftovers before doing so.
>
> Change looks fine:
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>
> Are you looking for us to merge or merge through another tree?
>
> If us, did the base patch always enabling PREEMPT_COUNT go into 5.9 or is
> it heading to 5.10? We can queue this earliest for 5.11 as drm-next closed
> for 5.10 at week of -rc5.
If at all it goes through rcu/tip because it depends on the earlier patches.
Thanks,
tglx
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-28 23:30 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] lib/debug: Remove pointless ARCH_NO_PREEMPT dependencies paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] preempt: Make preempt count unconditional paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] preempt: Cleanup PREEMPT_COUNT leftovers paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] lockdep: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] mm/pagemap: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] locking/bitspinlock: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/15] uaccess: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] sched: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] ARM: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] xtensa: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/15] drm/i915: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` paulmck
2020-09-28 23:30 ` paulmck
2020-10-01 7:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Joonas Lahtinen
2020-10-01 7:17 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-10-01 7:17 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2020-10-01 8:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-10-01 8:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-01 8:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-10-01 16:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-01 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-01 16:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-28 23:30 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcutorture: " paulmck
2020-09-28 23:31 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/15] preempt: Remove PREEMPT_COUNT from Kconfig paulmck
2020-09-28 23:31 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu/tree: Allocate a page when caller is preemptible paulmck
2020-09-29 12:07 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-30 1:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-09-30 8:41 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-30 12:31 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-09-30 23:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-01 9:02 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-01 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-02 6:57 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-02 14:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-01 16:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-10-01 20:03 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2020-09-28 23:31 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] kvfree_rcu(): Fix ifnullfree.cocci warnings paulmck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871riigxp9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.