All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtables/hugevmap: Use the arch helper to identify huge vmap support.
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:01:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rk1opcu.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202008200034.CGkDyB26%lkp@intel.com>

kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:

> Hi "Aneesh,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on hnaz-linux-mm/master]
> [also build test ERROR on powerpc/next linus/master v5.9-rc1 next-20200819]
> [cannot apply to mmotm/master]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/mm-debug_vm_pgtable-fixes/20200819-213446
> base:   https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master
> config: i386-randconfig-s002-20200818 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         # sparse version: v0.6.2-183-gaa6ede3b-dirty
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=i386 
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:484:12: error: redefinition of 'arch_ioremap_p4d_supported'
>      484 | int __init arch_ioremap_p4d_supported(void)
>          |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:12:
>    include/linux/io.h:41:19: note: previous definition of 'arch_ioremap_p4d_supported' was here
>       41 | static inline int arch_ioremap_p4d_supported(void)
>          |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I guess trying to work this out without using #ifdef is complex. I ended
up with the below

1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 14 ++++++++++++--

modified   mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -202,11 +202,12 @@ static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	WARN_ON(!pmd_leaf(pmd));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	pmd_t pmd;
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP))
+	if (!arch_ioremap_pmd_supported())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD huge\n");
@@ -220,6 +221,10 @@ static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
 	WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
 }
+#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+#endif /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+
 
 static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
@@ -316,11 +321,12 @@ static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	WARN_ON(!pud_leaf(pud));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	pud_t pud;
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP))
+	if (!arch_ioremap_pud_supported())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PUD huge\n");
@@ -334,6 +340,10 @@ static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
 	WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
 }
+#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+#endif /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+
 #else  /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */
 static void __init pud_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
 static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtables/hugevmap: Use the arch helper to identify huge vmap support.
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:01:13 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rk1opcu.fsf@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202008200034.CGkDyB26%lkp@intel.com>

kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> writes:

> Hi "Aneesh,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on hnaz-linux-mm/master]
> [also build test ERROR on powerpc/next linus/master v5.9-rc1 next-20200819]
> [cannot apply to mmotm/master]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aneesh-Kumar-K-V/mm-debug_vm_pgtable-fixes/20200819-213446
> base:   https://github.com/hnaz/linux-mm master
> config: i386-randconfig-s002-20200818 (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-9 (Debian 9.3.0-15) 9.3.0
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         # sparse version: v0.6.2-183-gaa6ede3b-dirty
>         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>         make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=i386 
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>>> arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:484:12: error: redefinition of 'arch_ioremap_p4d_supported'
>      484 | int __init arch_ioremap_p4d_supported(void)
>          |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>    In file included from arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c:12:
>    include/linux/io.h:41:19: note: previous definition of 'arch_ioremap_p4d_supported' was here
>       41 | static inline int arch_ioremap_p4d_supported(void)
>          |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I guess trying to work this out without using #ifdef is complex. I ended
up with the below

1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c | 14 ++++++++++++--

modified   mm/debug_vm_pgtable.c
@@ -202,11 +202,12 @@ static void __init pmd_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	WARN_ON(!pmd_leaf(pmd));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	pmd_t pmd;
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP))
+	if (!arch_ioremap_pmd_supported())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PMD huge\n");
@@ -220,6 +221,10 @@ static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
 	WARN_ON(!pmd_none(pmd));
 }
+#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+static void __init pmd_huge_tests(pmd_t *pmdp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+#endif /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+
 
 static void __init pmd_savedwrite_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
@@ -316,11 +321,12 @@ static void __init pud_leaf_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	WARN_ON(!pud_leaf(pud));
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP
 static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 {
 	pud_t pud;
 
-	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP))
+	if (!arch_ioremap_pud_supported())
 		return;
 
 	pr_debug("Validating PUD huge\n");
@@ -334,6 +340,10 @@ static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot)
 	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
 	WARN_ON(!pud_none(pud));
 }
+#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+static void __init pud_huge_tests(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
+#endif /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP */
+
 #else  /* !CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_PUD */
 static void __init pud_basic_tests(unsigned long pfn, pgprot_t prot) { }
 static void __init pud_advanced_tests(struct mm_struct *mm,


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-20  5:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19 13:00 [PATCH v2 00/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] powerpc/mm: Add DEBUG_VM WARN for pmd_clear Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] powerpc/mm: Move setting pte specific flags to pfn_pte Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/ppc64: Avoid setting top bits in radom value Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtables/hugevmap: Use the arch helper to identify huge vmap support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 16:29   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-19 16:29     ` kernel test robot
2020-08-19 16:29     ` kernel test robot
2020-08-20  5:31     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2020-08-20  5:31       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:38   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:38     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-19 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/savedwrite: Enable savedwrite test with CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:00   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/THP: Mark the pte entry huge before using set_pmd/pud_at Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/set_pte/pmd/pud: Don't use set_*_at to update an existing pte entry Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-20 14:32   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-08-21  7:14     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:20       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/thp: Use page table depost/withdraw with THP Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Move non page table modifying test together Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/locks: Take correct page table lock Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:03   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:03     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:08     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:08       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/pmd_clear: Don't use pmd/pud_clear on pte entries Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable/hugetlb: Disable hugetlb test on ppc64 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable: populate a pte entry before fetching it Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:45 ` [PATCH v2 00/13] mm/debug_vm_pgtable fixes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-19 13:45   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  3:33   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  3:33     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  4:20     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  4:20       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  6:53     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  6:53       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:01       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:01         ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:10         ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:10           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:50           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  8:50             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2020-08-21  9:09             ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  9:09               ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:51 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-08-21  8:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-09-01  8:03   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-01  8:03     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-01  8:03     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-01  8:03     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-01  9:11     ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-09-01  9:11       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-09-01  9:11       ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-09-01  9:11       ` Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=871rk1opcu.fsf@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.