From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:20:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rlc9upc.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466093748.24747.4655547403463921814.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Right now purgatory implementation is only minimal. But if purgatory
> code is to be enhanced to copy memory to the backup region and verify
Can't the memcpy be done in asm? We have arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S
for example, perhaps it could be linked in with the purgatory?
> sha256 digest, relocations may have to be applied to the purgatory.
Do we want to do the sha256 verification? My original patch series for
kexec_file_load() had a purgatory in C from kexec-tools which did the
sha256 verification but Michael Ellerman thought it was unnecessary and
decided to use the simpler purgatory in asm from kexec-lite.
As a result, this relocation processing became unnecessary.
> So, add support to relocate purgatory in kexec_file_load system call
> by setting up TOC pointer and applying RELA relocations as needed.
If we do want to use a C purgatory, Michael Ellerman had suggested
building it as a Position Independent Executable, which greatly reduces
the number and types of relocations that are needed. See patches 4 and 9
here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/1478748449-3894-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
In the series above I hadn't converted x86 to PIE. If I had done that,
possibly Dave Young's opinion would have been different. :-)
If that's still not desirable, he suggested in that discussion lifting
some code from x86 to generic code, which I implemented and would
simplify this patch as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/5009580.5GxAkTrMYA@morokweng/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> [lkp: In v1, 'struct mem_sym' was declared in parameter list]
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3:
> * Fixed get_toc_section() to return the section info that had relocations
> applied, to calculate the correct toc pointer.
> * Fixed how relocation value is converted to relative while applying
> R_PPC64_REL64 & R_PPC64_REL32 relocations.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fixed wrong use of 'struct mem_sym' in local_entry_offset() as
> reported by lkp. lkp report for reference:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1264421/
>
>
> arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S | 8 +
> 2 files changed, 345 insertions(+)
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:20:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rlc9upc.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466093748.24747.4655547403463921814.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Right now purgatory implementation is only minimal. But if purgatory
> code is to be enhanced to copy memory to the backup region and verify
Can't the memcpy be done in asm? We have arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S
for example, perhaps it could be linked in with the purgatory?
> sha256 digest, relocations may have to be applied to the purgatory.
Do we want to do the sha256 verification? My original patch series for
kexec_file_load() had a purgatory in C from kexec-tools which did the
sha256 verification but Michael Ellerman thought it was unnecessary and
decided to use the simpler purgatory in asm from kexec-lite.
As a result, this relocation processing became unnecessary.
> So, add support to relocate purgatory in kexec_file_load system call
> by setting up TOC pointer and applying RELA relocations as needed.
If we do want to use a C purgatory, Michael Ellerman had suggested
building it as a Position Independent Executable, which greatly reduces
the number and types of relocations that are needed. See patches 4 and 9
here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/1478748449-3894-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
In the series above I hadn't converted x86 to PIE. If I had done that,
possibly Dave Young's opinion would have been different. :-)
If that's still not desirable, he suggested in that discussion lifting
some code from x86 to generic code, which I implemented and would
simplify this patch as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/5009580.5GxAkTrMYA@morokweng/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> [lkp: In v1, 'struct mem_sym' was declared in parameter list]
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3:
> * Fixed get_toc_section() to return the section info that had relocations
> applied, to calculate the correct toc pointer.
> * Fixed how relocation value is converted to relative while applying
> R_PPC64_REL64 & R_PPC64_REL32 relocations.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fixed wrong use of 'struct mem_sym' in local_entry_offset() as
> reported by lkp. lkp report for reference:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1264421/
>
>
> arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S | 8 +
> 2 files changed, 345 insertions(+)
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>, Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.ibm.com>, Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 21:20:31 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rlc9upc.fsf@morokweng.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159466093748.24747.4655547403463921814.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> Right now purgatory implementation is only minimal. But if purgatory
> code is to be enhanced to copy memory to the backup region and verify
Can't the memcpy be done in asm? We have arch/powerpc/lib/memcpy_64.S
for example, perhaps it could be linked in with the purgatory?
> sha256 digest, relocations may have to be applied to the purgatory.
Do we want to do the sha256 verification? My original patch series for
kexec_file_load() had a purgatory in C from kexec-tools which did the
sha256 verification but Michael Ellerman thought it was unnecessary and
decided to use the simpler purgatory in asm from kexec-lite.
As a result, this relocation processing became unnecessary.
> So, add support to relocate purgatory in kexec_file_load system call
> by setting up TOC pointer and applying RELA relocations as needed.
If we do want to use a C purgatory, Michael Ellerman had suggested
building it as a Position Independent Executable, which greatly reduces
the number and types of relocations that are needed. See patches 4 and 9
here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/1478748449-3894-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
In the series above I hadn't converted x86 to PIE. If I had done that,
possibly Dave Young's opinion would have been different. :-)
If that's still not desirable, he suggested in that discussion lifting
some code from x86 to generic code, which I implemented and would
simplify this patch as well:
https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/5009580.5GxAkTrMYA@morokweng/
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> [lkp: In v1, 'struct mem_sym' was declared in parameter list]
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> v2 -> v3:
> * Fixed get_toc_section() to return the section info that had relocations
> applied, to calculate the correct toc pointer.
> * Fixed how relocation value is converted to relative while applying
> R_PPC64_REL64 & R_PPC64_REL32 relocations.
>
> v1 -> v2:
> * Fixed wrong use of 'struct mem_sym' in local_entry_offset() as
> reported by lkp. lkp report for reference:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1264421/
>
>
> arch/powerpc/kexec/file_load_64.c | 337 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/powerpc/purgatory/trampoline_64.S | 8 +
> 2 files changed, 345 insertions(+)
--
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-16 0:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 125+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-13 17:20 [PATCH v3 00/12] ppc64: enable kdump support for kexec_file_load syscall Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:20 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-14 21:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 21:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 21:00 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] powerpc/kexec_file: mark PPC64 specific code Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 1:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17 4:46 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:46 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:46 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 18:34 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17 18:34 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] powerpc/kexec_file: add helper functions for getting memory ranges Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-14 23:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 23:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-14 23:49 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:08 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:08 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:32 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:32 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:32 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 20:00 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 20:00 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ppc64/kexec_file: avoid stomping memory used by special regions Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 2:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 2:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 2:39 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 5:58 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 5:58 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 5:58 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:09 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:09 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:59 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] powerpc/drmem: make lmb walk a bit more flexible Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:21 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 3:50 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 3:50 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 3:50 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:09 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:09 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:01 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:01 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:01 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-15 22:52 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 22:52 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-15 22:52 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:10 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:10 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:03 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-17 4:17 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-17 4:17 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann [this message]
2020-07-16 0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 0:20 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:11 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:11 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:12 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:12 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:12 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ppc64/kexec_file: setup the stack for purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 0:35 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 0:35 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 0:35 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:40 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:40 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:40 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ppc64/kexec_file: setup backup region for kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:22 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 1:38 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:38 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 1:38 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:10 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:10 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 22:06 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:06 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 22:06 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ppc64/kexec_file: prepare elfcore header for crashing kernel Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 2:22 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 2:22 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 2:22 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:07 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:07 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 21:57 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:57 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 21:57 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ppc64/kexec_file: add appropriate regions for memory reserve map Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 2:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 2:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 2:27 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-13 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ppc64/kexec_file: fix kexec load failure with lack of memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-13 17:23 ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-16 5:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 5:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2020-07-16 5:43 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rlc9upc.fsf@morokweng.localdomain \
--to=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=nayna@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=piliu@redhat.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.