Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: Add support for bcm43364 wireless chipset

[Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>]

Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> + Kalle (explicitly)
>
> On 5/8/2018 9:58 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 4 May 2018 at 08:48, Sean Lanigan <sean-k1Xf6wIwYfsQrrorzV6ljw@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Add support for the BCM43364 chipset via an SDIO interface, as used in
>>> e.g. the Murata 1FX module.
>>>
>>> The BCM43364 uses the same firmware as the BCM43430 (which is already
>>> included), the only difference is the omission of Bluetooth.
>>>
>>> However, the SDIO_ID for the BCM43364 is 02D0:A9A4, giving it a MODALIAS
>>> of sdio:c00v02D0dA9A4, which doesn't get recognised and hence doesn't
>>> load the brcmfmac module. Adding the 'A9A4' ID in the appropriate place
>>> triggers the brcmfmac driver to load, and then correctly use the
>>> firmware file 'brcmfmac43430-sdio.bin'.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Lanigan <sean-k1Xf6wIwYfsQrrorzV6ljw@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Arend, I assume you want to pick this up? If not, just tell and I can do it.
>
> Not necessarily. I let Kalle do the leg work ;-) Given the change I do
> not expect any conflict so we can go either way with a slight
> preference for wl-drivers-next. Kalle?

Yeah, I would like to take this to wireless-drivers-next. Less conflicts
that way.

-- 
Kalle Valo