From: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [nfsd] 4aac1bf05b: -2.9% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:35:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871tdg718x.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150929200613.66c3ab4f@synchrony.poochiereds.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3061 bytes --]
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> writes:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:27:54 +0800
> "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:49:32 +0800
>> > kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>> >>
>> >> =========================================================================================
>> >> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory:
>> >> lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd
>> >>
>> >> commit:
>> >> cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c
>> >> 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103
>> >>
>> >
>> > A question...
>> >
>> > I think my tree should now contain a fix for this, but with a
>> > performance regression like this it's difficult to know for sure.
>> >
>> > Is there some (automated) way to request that the KTR redo this test?
>> > If not, will I get a note saying "problem seems to now be fixed" or do
>> > I just take a lack of further emails from the KTR about this as a sign
>> > that it's resolved?
>>
>> Can you provide the branch name and commit ID for your tree with fix? I
>> can confirm whether it is fixed for you.
>>
> Sure:
>
> git://git.samba.org/jlayton/linux.git nfsd-4.4
>
> The tip commit is ed3d7c1e01a76f5ecc7444067704a82af4c2f76e.
>
It seems that the regression is fixed at that commit. Thanks!
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory:
lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd
commit:
cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c
4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103
ed3d7c1e01a76f5ecc7444067704a82af4c2f76e
cd2d35ff27c4fda9 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9 ed3d7c1e01a76f5ecc74440677
---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
14415356 ± 0% +2.6% 14788625 ± 1% +4.1% 15008301 ± 0% fsmark.app_overhead
441.60 ± 0% -2.9% 428.80 ± 0% -0.4% 439.68 ± 0% fsmark.files_per_sec
185.78 ± 0% +2.9% 191.26 ± 0% +0.3% 186.37 ± 0% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
185.78 ± 0% +2.9% 191.26 ± 0% +0.3% 186.37 ± 0% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
97472 ± 0% -2.8% 94713 ± 0% -0.8% 96657 ± 0% fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com>, <lkp@01.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lkp] [nfsd] 4aac1bf05b: -2.9% fsmark.files_per_sec
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 16:35:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871tdg718x.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150929200613.66c3ab4f@synchrony.poochiereds.net> (Jeff Layton's message of "Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:06:13 -0400")
Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> writes:
> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:27:54 +0800
> "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
>> Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Mon, 28 Sep 2015 14:49:32 +0800
>> > kernel test robot <ying.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> FYI, we noticed the below changes on
>> >>
>> >> =========================================================================================
>> >> tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory:
>> >> lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd
>> >>
>> >> commit:
>> >> cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c
>> >> 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103
>> >>
>> >
>> > A question...
>> >
>> > I think my tree should now contain a fix for this, but with a
>> > performance regression like this it's difficult to know for sure.
>> >
>> > Is there some (automated) way to request that the KTR redo this test?
>> > If not, will I get a note saying "problem seems to now be fixed" or do
>> > I just take a lack of further emails from the KTR about this as a sign
>> > that it's resolved?
>>
>> Can you provide the branch name and commit ID for your tree with fix? I
>> can confirm whether it is fixed for you.
>>
> Sure:
>
> git://git.samba.org/jlayton/linux.git nfsd-4.4
>
> The tip commit is ed3d7c1e01a76f5ecc7444067704a82af4c2f76e.
>
It seems that the regression is fixed at that commit. Thanks!
=========================================================================================
tbox_group/testcase/rootfs/kconfig/compiler/cpufreq_governor/iterations/nr_threads/disk/fs/fs2/filesize/test_size/sync_method/nr_directories/nr_files_per_directory:
lkp-ne04/fsmark/debian-x86_64-2015-02-07.cgz/x86_64-rhel/gcc-4.9/performance/1x/32t/1HDD/xfs/nfsv4/5K/400M/fsyncBeforeClose/16d/256fpd
commit:
cd2d35ff27c4fda9ba73b0aa84313e8e20ce4d2c
4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9a684fb2b7e6103
ed3d7c1e01a76f5ecc7444067704a82af4c2f76e
cd2d35ff27c4fda9 4aac1bf05b053a201a4b392dd9 ed3d7c1e01a76f5ecc74440677
---------------- -------------------------- --------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev %change %stddev
\ | \ | \
14415356 ± 0% +2.6% 14788625 ± 1% +4.1% 15008301 ± 0% fsmark.app_overhead
441.60 ± 0% -2.9% 428.80 ± 0% -0.4% 439.68 ± 0% fsmark.files_per_sec
185.78 ± 0% +2.9% 191.26 ± 0% +0.3% 186.37 ± 0% fsmark.time.elapsed_time
185.78 ± 0% +2.9% 191.26 ± 0% +0.3% 186.37 ± 0% fsmark.time.elapsed_time.max
97472 ± 0% -2.8% 94713 ± 0% -0.8% 96657 ± 0% fsmark.time.involuntary_context_switches
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-28 6:49 [nfsd] 4aac1bf05b: -2.9% fsmark.files_per_sec kernel test robot
2015-09-28 6:49 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2015-09-29 11:41 ` Jeff Layton
2015-09-29 11:41 ` [lkp] " Jeff Layton
2015-09-29 23:27 ` Huang, Ying
2015-09-29 23:27 ` [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2015-09-30 0:06 ` Jeff Layton
2015-09-30 0:06 ` [lkp] " Jeff Layton
2015-09-30 8:35 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2015-09-30 8:35 ` Huang, Ying
2015-09-30 10:03 ` Jeff Layton
2015-09-30 10:03 ` [lkp] " Jeff Layton
2015-09-30 23:17 ` Dave Chinner
2015-09-30 23:17 ` [lkp] " Dave Chinner
2015-10-01 0:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
2015-10-01 11:35 ` Jeff Layton
2015-10-01 11:35 ` [lkp] " Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871tdg718x.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.