From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Yanbo Li <yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dreamfly281@gmail.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
michal.kazior@tieto.com, ath10k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Debugfs entry to enable/disable BTC feature
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:56:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ti218me.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430514659-11743-1-git-send-email-yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com> (Yanbo Li's message of "Fri, 1 May 2015 14:10:59 -0700")
Yanbo Li <yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com> writes:
> As some radio have no connection with BT modules, enable the BTC feature
> will has some side effect if the radio's GPIO connect with any other HW
> modules. Add the control switcher "btc_feature" at debugfs and set the
> feature as disable by default to avoid such case.
>
> To enable this feature, execute:
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phyX/ath10k/btc_feature
> To disable:
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phyX/ath10k/btc_feature
I suspect "BTC" does not really tell much for most of the people and
acronyms should be always spelled out at least once.
> Signed-off-by: Yanbo Li <yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> index 8444adf42195..6852e7fc5d5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ struct ath10k {
> u32 fw_cold_reset_counter;
> } stats;
>
> + bool btc_feature;
Could we use ar->dev_flags instead?
> +static ssize_t ath10k_write_btc_feature(struct file *file,
> + const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct ath10k *ar = file->private_data;
> + char buf[32];
> + size_t buf_size;
> + bool val;
> +
> + buf_size = min(count, (sizeof(buf) - 1));
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, buf_size))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + buf[buf_size] = '\0';
> + if (strtobool(buf, &val) != 0) {
> + ath10k_warn(ar, "Wrong BTC feature setting\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
> + ar->btc_feature = val;
> + queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
> + mutex_unlock(&ar->conf_mutex);
Shouldn't we test ATH10K_STATE_ON first?
> int ath10k_debug_create(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> ar->debug.fw_crash_data = vzalloc(sizeof(*ar->debug.fw_crash_data));
> @@ -2195,6 +2243,8 @@ int ath10k_debug_register(struct ath10k *ar)
> debugfs_create_file("quiet_period", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> ar->debug.debugfs_phy, ar, &fops_quiet_period);
>
> + debugfs_create_file("btc_feature", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + ar->debug.debugfs_phy, ar,
> &fops_btc_feature);
At least some of the other drivers use term btcoex for this, I think we
should be consistent and use the same.
I can do the changes and send v2 for this.
--
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Yanbo Li <yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: <dreamfly281@gmail.com>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
<michal.kazior@tieto.com>, <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: Debugfs entry to enable/disable BTC feature
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 15:56:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871ti218me.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430514659-11743-1-git-send-email-yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com> (Yanbo Li's message of "Fri, 1 May 2015 14:10:59 -0700")
Yanbo Li <yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com> writes:
> As some radio have no connection with BT modules, enable the BTC feature
> will has some side effect if the radio's GPIO connect with any other HW
> modules. Add the control switcher "btc_feature" at debugfs and set the
> feature as disable by default to avoid such case.
>
> To enable this feature, execute:
> echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phyX/ath10k/btc_feature
> To disable:
> echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/ieee80211/phyX/ath10k/btc_feature
I suspect "BTC" does not really tell much for most of the people and
acronyms should be always spelled out at least once.
> Signed-off-by: Yanbo Li <yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> index 8444adf42195..6852e7fc5d5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
> @@ -720,6 +720,8 @@ struct ath10k {
> u32 fw_cold_reset_counter;
> } stats;
>
> + bool btc_feature;
Could we use ar->dev_flags instead?
> +static ssize_t ath10k_write_btc_feature(struct file *file,
> + const char __user *ubuf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + struct ath10k *ar = file->private_data;
> + char buf[32];
> + size_t buf_size;
> + bool val;
> +
> + buf_size = min(count, (sizeof(buf) - 1));
> + if (copy_from_user(buf, ubuf, buf_size))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + buf[buf_size] = '\0';
> + if (strtobool(buf, &val) != 0) {
> + ath10k_warn(ar, "Wrong BTC feature setting\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
> + ar->btc_feature = val;
> + queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->restart_work);
> + mutex_unlock(&ar->conf_mutex);
Shouldn't we test ATH10K_STATE_ON first?
> int ath10k_debug_create(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> ar->debug.fw_crash_data = vzalloc(sizeof(*ar->debug.fw_crash_data));
> @@ -2195,6 +2243,8 @@ int ath10k_debug_register(struct ath10k *ar)
> debugfs_create_file("quiet_period", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> ar->debug.debugfs_phy, ar, &fops_quiet_period);
>
> + debugfs_create_file("btc_feature", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> + ar->debug.debugfs_phy, ar,
> &fops_btc_feature);
At least some of the other drivers use term btcoex for this, I think we
should be consistent and use the same.
I can do the changes and send v2 for this.
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-01 21:10 [PATCH] ath10k: Debugfs entry to enable/disable BTC feature Yanbo Li
2015-05-01 21:10 ` Yanbo Li
2015-05-27 12:56 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2015-05-27 12:56 ` Kalle Valo
2015-05-28 1:07 ` Li, Yanbo
2015-05-28 1:07 ` Li, Yanbo
2015-06-08 13:44 ` Kalle Valo
2015-06-08 13:44 ` Kalle Valo
2015-06-09 18:58 ` YanBo
2015-06-09 18:58 ` YanBo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871ti218me.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=dreamfly281@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.kazior@tieto.com \
--cc=yanbol@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.