From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: miscellaneous powerdomain-related improvements
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:27:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871uqgswy8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130093931.11027.31048.stgit@dusk> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:43:12 -0700")
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:
> This series optimizes some of the powerdomain-related code in
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm*, and fixes a bug or two. These were noticed while
> working on the functional powerstate code.
>
> Rajendra and Santosh, if you have a spare moment, could you please
> peek at the OMAP4 LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE part of the second patch? It
> makes sense to me in theory, but you both would probably know better
> than I :-)
>
> Kevin, want to take this series (assuming folks are happy with it) ?
Yes, I'll take this and add the Ack from Santosh. Thanks for the nice
cleanup.
Will submit after seeing a Tested-by from someone who can test with CORE
retention/off on OMAP4 (hint, hint, Tero :)
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: miscellaneous powerdomain-related improvements
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:27:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871uqgswy8.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120130093931.11027.31048.stgit@dusk> (Paul Walmsley's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:43:12 -0700")
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> writes:
> This series optimizes some of the powerdomain-related code in
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm*, and fixes a bug or two. These were noticed while
> working on the functional powerstate code.
>
> Rajendra and Santosh, if you have a spare moment, could you please
> peek at the OMAP4 LOWPOWERSTATECHANGE part of the second patch? It
> makes sense to me in theory, but you both would probably know better
> than I :-)
>
> Kevin, want to take this series (assuming folks are happy with it) ?
Yes, I'll take this and add the Ack from Santosh. Thanks for the nice
cleanup.
Will submit after seeing a Tested-by from someone who can test with CORE
retention/off on OMAP4 (hint, hint, Tero :)
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 9:43 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: miscellaneous powerdomain-related improvements Paul Walmsley
2012-01-30 9:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-30 9:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP3: PM: remove superfluous calls to pwrdm_clear_all_prev_pwrst() Paul Walmsley
2012-01-30 9:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-30 10:54 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-30 10:54 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 0:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-31 0:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-31 3:53 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-01-31 3:53 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-01-31 6:57 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 6:57 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 7:15 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-31 7:15 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-31 7:23 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 7:23 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 7:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-31 7:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-31 7:34 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 7:34 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 7:49 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-31 7:49 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-31 8:37 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 8:37 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-31 17:29 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-01 19:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-01 19:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 7:13 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 7:13 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 8:33 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 8:33 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 8:59 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 8:59 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 10:05 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 10:05 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 10:17 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 10:17 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 15:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 15:24 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-02-02 19:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 19:59 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-02 18:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-02-02 18:14 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-30 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: clean up omap_set_pwrdm_state() Paul Walmsley
2012-01-30 9:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-30 12:17 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-30 12:17 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-01-31 3:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-01-31 3:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-01-30 21:27 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-01-30 21:27 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: miscellaneous powerdomain-related improvements Kevin Hilman
2012-01-31 7:21 ` Tero Kristo
2012-01-31 7:21 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-01 13:55 ` Tero Kristo
2012-02-01 13:55 ` Tero Kristo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871uqgswy8.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.