Re: [PATCH v7 06/10] qapi: replace if condition list with dict {'all': [...]}

[Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>]

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:

> marcandre.lureau@redhat.com writes:
>
>> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>>
>> Replace the simple list sugar form with a recursive structure that will
>> accept other operators in the following commits (all, any or not).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

[...]

>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/expr.py b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> index cf98923fa6..b5187bfbca 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/expr.py
>> @@ -259,14 +259,12 @@ def check_flags(expr: _JSONObject, info: QAPISourceInfo) -> None:
>>  
>>  def check_if(expr: _JSONObject, info: QAPISourceInfo, source: str) -> None:
>>      """
>> -    Normalize and validate the ``if`` member of an object.
>> +    Validate the ``if`` member of an object.
>>  
>> -    The ``if`` member may be either a ``str`` or a ``List[str]``.
>> -    A ``str`` value will be normalized to ``List[str]``.
>> +    The ``if`` member may be either a ``str`` or a dict.
>>  
>>      :forms:
>> -      :sugared: ``Union[str, List[str]]``
>> -      :canonical: ``List[str]``
>> +      :canonical: ``Union[str, dict]``
>
> John hasn't answered my question whether :forms: makes sensw without
> :sugared:.  If it doesn't, I can drop it in my tree.

We have a bunch of check_FOO().  Some normalize, and have :forms:.  Some
don't, and don't have :forms:.  This patch changes check_if() not to
normalize.  So far, it leaves a degenerate :forms: behind.  Let's drop
it.  Can do in my tree.

[...]