From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com>
Cc: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju@tsinghua.edu.cn>,
kuba@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] p54: avoid accessing the data mapped to streaming DMA
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:00:10 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736427w5x.fsf@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a7878a0d-fe97-0c88-3c99-a08dab7be6bc@gmail.com> (Christian Lamparter's message of "Fri, 28 Aug 2020 23:19:09 +0200")
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> writes:
> On 2020-08-26 18:02, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On 2020-08-02 15:29, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>>>> In p54p_tx(), skb->data is mapped to streaming DMA on line 337:
>>>> mapping = pci_map_single(..., skb->data, ...);
>>>>
>>>> Then skb->data is accessed on line 349:
>>>> desc->device_addr = ((struct p54_hdr *)skb->data)->req_id;
>>>>
>>>> This access may cause data inconsistency between CPU cache and hardware.
>>>>
>>>> To fix this problem, ((struct p54_hdr *)skb->data)->req_id is stored in
>>>> a local variable before DMA mapping, and then the driver accesses this
>>>> local variable instead of skb->data.
>>>
>>> Interesting. Please bear with me here. From my understanding, the
>>> streaming direction is set to PCI_DMA_TODEVICE. So is it really
>>> possible for the hardware to interfere with the data without the IOMMU
>>> catching this?
>>
>> Also is there any documentation about this scenario? I would like to
>> understand this better.
>
> I usually rely on the information present in Documentation:
> <https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt>
>
> The relevant extract for p54's DMA_TO_DEVICE decision likely comes from:
>
> "For Networking drivers, it's a rather simple affair. For transmit
> packets, map/unmap them with the DMA_TO_DEVICE direction
> specifier. For receive packets, just the opposite, map/unmap them
> with the DMA_FROM_DEVICE direction specifier."
>
> "Only streaming mappings specify a direction, consistent mappings
> implicitly have a direction attribute setting of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL."
This is not very clearly written, I guess it's assumed everyone know
this stuff :)
> But looking around on the Internet, I came across this in "Chapter 15.
> Memory Mapping and DMA" of the Linux Device Drivers, 3rd Edition:
>
> <https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/linux-device-drivers/0596005903/ch15.html>
>
> |Setting up streaming DMA mappings
> |[...]
> |
> |Some important rules apply to streaming DMA mappings:
> | * [...]
> |
> | * Once a buffer has been mapped, it belongs to the device, not the
> | processor. Until the buffer has been unmapped, the driver should
> not | touch its contents in any way. Only after dma_unmap_single has
> been | called is it safe for the driver to access the contents of
> the
> | buffer (with one exception that we see shortly). Among other things,
> | this rule implies that a buffer being written to a device cannot be
> | mapped until it contains all the data to write."
> |
> | [...] (More informative text, but only)
>
> From the sentence "Once a buffer has been mapped, it belongs to the
> device, not the processor". I think that Jia-Ju Bai's patch is doing
> exactly this "by the book".
Yeah, this is much better and understandable. Thanks for checking.
> Therefore, it should be applied and backported:
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Ok, I'll add that.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-31 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-02 13:29 [PATCH] p54: avoid accessing the data mapped to streaming DMA Jia-Ju Bai
2020-08-18 12:41 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-18 17:27 ` Christian Lamparter
2020-08-26 16:02 ` Kalle Valo
2020-08-28 21:19 ` Christian Lamparter
2020-08-31 14:00 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-09-01 9:34 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8736427w5x.fsf@codeaurora.org \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=baijiaju@tsinghua.edu.cn \
--cc=chunkeey@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.