From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Pankaj Bharadiya" <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>,
daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Manasi Navare" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
"Gwan-gyeong Mun" <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Cc: pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/display/dp: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:56:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87368x1g53.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406112800.23762-7-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote:
> struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information
> in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from.
The patch no longer applies.
>
> Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* at places where struct intel_dp struct
> pointer is available.
>
> Conversion is done with below sementic patch:
>
> @@
> identifier func, T;
> @@
> func(struct intel_dp *T,...) {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(T);
> <+...
> (
> -WARN_ON(
> +drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> |
> -WARN_ON_ONCE(
> +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> )
> ...+>
>
> }
>
> @@
> identifier func, T;
> @@
> func(...) {
> ...
> struct intel_dp *T = ...;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(T);
> <+...
> (
> -WARN_ON(
> +drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> |
> -WARN_ON_ONCE(
> +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> )
> ...+>
>
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index db6ae8e9af6e..5076a7cfe0e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,10 @@ static int intel_dp_rate_index(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
>
> static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> - WARN_ON(!intel_dp->num_source_rates || !intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> + !intel_dp->num_source_rates || !intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
>
> intel_dp->num_common_rates = intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
> intel_dp->num_source_rates,
> @@ -419,7 +422,7 @@ static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->common_rates);
>
> /* Paranoia, there should always be something in common. */
> - if (WARN_ON(intel_dp->num_common_rates == 0)) {
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, intel_dp->num_common_rates == 0)) {
> intel_dp->common_rates[0] = 162000;
> intel_dp->num_common_rates = 1;
> }
> @@ -1549,6 +1552,7 @@ static ssize_t
> intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(aux, struct intel_dp, aux);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> u8 txbuf[20], rxbuf[20];
> size_t txsize, rxsize;
> int ret;
> @@ -1562,10 +1566,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> txsize = msg->size ? HEADER_SIZE + msg->size : BARE_ADDRESS_SIZE;
> rxsize = 2; /* 0 or 1 data bytes */
>
> - if (WARN_ON(txsize > 20))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, txsize > 20))
> return -E2BIG;
>
> - WARN_ON(!msg->buffer != !msg->size);
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !msg->buffer != !msg->size);
>
> if (msg->buffer)
> memcpy(txbuf + HEADER_SIZE, msg->buffer, msg->size);
> @@ -1590,7 +1594,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> txsize = msg->size ? HEADER_SIZE : BARE_ADDRESS_SIZE;
> rxsize = msg->size + 1;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(rxsize > 20))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, rxsize > 20))
> return -E2BIG;
>
> ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, txsize,
> @@ -1864,10 +1868,11 @@ static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> int
> intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int len;
>
> len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp, intel_dp->max_link_rate);
> - if (WARN_ON(len <= 0))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, len <= 0))
> return 162000;
>
> return intel_dp->common_rates[len - 1];
> @@ -1875,10 +1880,11 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int i = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->sink_rates,
> intel_dp->num_sink_rates, rate);
>
> - if (WARN_ON(i < 0))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, i < 0))
> i = 0;
>
> return i;
> @@ -5404,6 +5410,7 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static int
> intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> bool bret;
>
> if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> @@ -5412,7 +5419,7 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> int retry;
> bool handled;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(intel_dp->active_mst_links < 0);
> + drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, intel_dp->active_mst_links < 0);
> bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi);
> go_again:
> if (bret == true) {
> @@ -5695,11 +5702,12 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static enum drm_connector_status
> intel_dp_detect_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = dp_to_lspcon(intel_dp);
> u8 *dpcd = intel_dp->dpcd;
> u8 type;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)))
> return connector_status_connected;
>
> if (lspcon->active)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Pankaj Bharadiya" <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>,
daniel@ffwll.ch, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Manasi Navare" <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>,
"Imre Deak" <imre.deak@intel.com>,
"Gwan-gyeong Mun" <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/display/dp: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN*
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:56:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87368x1g53.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406112800.23762-7-pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
On Mon, 06 Apr 2020, Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com> wrote:
> struct drm_device specific drm_WARN* macros include device information
> in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from.
The patch no longer applies.
>
> Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* at places where struct intel_dp struct
> pointer is available.
>
> Conversion is done with below sementic patch:
>
> @@
> identifier func, T;
> @@
> func(struct intel_dp *T,...) {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(T);
> <+...
> (
> -WARN_ON(
> +drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> |
> -WARN_ON_ONCE(
> +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> )
> ...+>
>
> }
>
> @@
> identifier func, T;
> @@
> func(...) {
> ...
> struct intel_dp *T = ...;
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(T);
> <+...
> (
> -WARN_ON(
> +drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> |
> -WARN_ON_ONCE(
> +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm,
> ...)
> )
> ...+>
>
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index db6ae8e9af6e..5076a7cfe0e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -410,7 +410,10 @@ static int intel_dp_rate_index(const int *rates, int len, int rate)
>
> static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> - WARN_ON(!intel_dp->num_source_rates || !intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
> + !intel_dp->num_source_rates || !intel_dp->num_sink_rates);
>
> intel_dp->num_common_rates = intersect_rates(intel_dp->source_rates,
> intel_dp->num_source_rates,
> @@ -419,7 +422,7 @@ static void intel_dp_set_common_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> intel_dp->common_rates);
>
> /* Paranoia, there should always be something in common. */
> - if (WARN_ON(intel_dp->num_common_rates == 0)) {
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, intel_dp->num_common_rates == 0)) {
> intel_dp->common_rates[0] = 162000;
> intel_dp->num_common_rates = 1;
> }
> @@ -1549,6 +1552,7 @@ static ssize_t
> intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = container_of(aux, struct intel_dp, aux);
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> u8 txbuf[20], rxbuf[20];
> size_t txsize, rxsize;
> int ret;
> @@ -1562,10 +1566,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> txsize = msg->size ? HEADER_SIZE + msg->size : BARE_ADDRESS_SIZE;
> rxsize = 2; /* 0 or 1 data bytes */
>
> - if (WARN_ON(txsize > 20))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, txsize > 20))
> return -E2BIG;
>
> - WARN_ON(!msg->buffer != !msg->size);
> + drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, !msg->buffer != !msg->size);
>
> if (msg->buffer)
> memcpy(txbuf + HEADER_SIZE, msg->buffer, msg->size);
> @@ -1590,7 +1594,7 @@ intel_dp_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> txsize = msg->size ? HEADER_SIZE : BARE_ADDRESS_SIZE;
> rxsize = msg->size + 1;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(rxsize > 20))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, rxsize > 20))
> return -E2BIG;
>
> ret = intel_dp_aux_xfer(intel_dp, txbuf, txsize,
> @@ -1864,10 +1868,11 @@ static void intel_dp_print_rates(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> int
> intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int len;
>
> len = intel_dp_common_len_rate_limit(intel_dp, intel_dp->max_link_rate);
> - if (WARN_ON(len <= 0))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, len <= 0))
> return 162000;
>
> return intel_dp->common_rates[len - 1];
> @@ -1875,10 +1880,11 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>
> int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> int i = intel_dp_rate_index(intel_dp->sink_rates,
> intel_dp->num_sink_rates, rate);
>
> - if (WARN_ON(i < 0))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, i < 0))
> i = 0;
>
> return i;
> @@ -5404,6 +5410,7 @@ static void intel_dp_handle_test_request(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static int
> intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> bool bret;
>
> if (intel_dp->is_mst) {
> @@ -5412,7 +5419,7 @@ intel_dp_check_mst_status(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> int retry;
> bool handled;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(intel_dp->active_mst_links < 0);
> + drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&i915->drm, intel_dp->active_mst_links < 0);
> bret = intel_dp_get_sink_irq_esi(intel_dp, esi);
> go_again:
> if (bret == true) {
> @@ -5695,11 +5702,12 @@ intel_dp_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> static enum drm_connector_status
> intel_dp_detect_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> struct intel_lspcon *lspcon = dp_to_lspcon(intel_dp);
> u8 *dpcd = intel_dp->dpcd;
> u8 type;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)))
> + if (drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)))
> return connector_status_connected;
>
> if (lspcon->active)
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-06 11:27 [PATCH 00/18] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 01/18] drm/i915/display/icl_dsi: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 18:08 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 18:08 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 18:08 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 02/18] drm/i915/display/atomic_plane: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 03/18] drm/i915/display/ddi: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 20:21 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 20:21 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 20:21 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 04/18] drm/i915/display/display: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 05/18] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 7:53 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 9:19 ` Imre Deak
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 06/18] drm/i915/display/dp: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 6:56 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2020-04-21 6:56 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 07/18] drm/i915/display/dpll_mgr: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 08/18] drm/i915/display/frontbuffer: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 09/18] drm/i915/display/global_state: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 10/18] drm/i915/display/overlay: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 11/18] drm/i915/display/sdvo: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 6:55 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 12/18] drm/i915/display/tc: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 6:57 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 13/18] drm/i915/display/vlv_dsi: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 22:41 ` kbuild test robot
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 14/18] drm/i915/gem: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 8:30 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 15/18] drm/i915/i915_drv: Prefer drm_WARN_ON over WARN_ON Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 8:24 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 8:24 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 9:59 ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-04-21 9:59 ` [Intel-gfx] " Bharadiya,Pankaj
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 16/18] drm/i915/pmu: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [PATCH 17/18] drm/i915/pm: " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 8:26 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 8:26 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2020-04-06 11:28 ` [PATCH 18/18] drm/i915/runtime_pm: Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-06 11:28 ` [Intel-gfx] " Pankaj Bharadiya
2020-04-21 8:28 ` Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 9:48 ` Imre Deak
2020-04-06 11:59 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2020-04-06 12:28 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-04-06 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* (rev2) Patchwork
2020-04-06 15:14 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-04-06 19:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2020-04-21 8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/18] Prefer drm_WARN* over WARN* Jani Nikula
2020-04-21 10:01 ` Bharadiya,Pankaj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87368x1g53.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=manasi.d.navare@intel.com \
--cc=pankaj.laxminarayan.bharadiya@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.