All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] arm: check regime, not current state, for ATS write PAR format
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:10:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87375rs80t.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509719814-6191-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>


Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> In do_ats_write(), rather than using extended_addresses_enabled() to
> decide whether the value we get back from get_phys_addr() is a 64-bit
> format PAR or a 32-bit one, use arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format().
>
> This is not really the correct answer, because the PAR format
> depends on the AT instruction being used, not just on the
> translation regime. However getting this correct requires a
> significant refactoring, so that get_phys_addr() returns raw
> information about the fault which the caller can then assemble
> into a suitable FSR/PAR/syndrome for its purposes, rather than
> get_phys_addr() returning a pre-formatted FSR.
>
> However this change at least improves the situation by making
> the PAR work correctly for address translation operations done
> at AArch64 EL2 on the EL2 translation regime. In particular,
> this is necessary for Xen to be able to run in our emulation,
> so this seems like a safer interim fix given that we are in freeze.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

As far as it goes it seems reasonable:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

> ---
> I guess I should have a go at the "correct answer" I sketch
> above, but no promises about when I'll get time for that :-(
>
>  target/arm/helper.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 96113fe..37af750 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ static uint64_t do_ats_write(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t value,
>
>      ret = get_phys_addr(env, value, access_type, mmu_idx,
>                          &phys_addr, &attrs, &prot, &page_size, &fsr, &fi);
> -    if (extended_addresses_enabled(env)) {
> +    if (arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format(env, mmu_idx)) {
>          /* fsr is a DFSR/IFSR value for the long descriptor
>           * translation table format, but with WnR always clear.
>           * Convert it to a 64-bit PAR.


--
Alex Bennée

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] arm: check regime, not current state, for ATS write PAR format
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:10:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87375rs80t.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509719814-6191-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>


Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:

> In do_ats_write(), rather than using extended_addresses_enabled() to
> decide whether the value we get back from get_phys_addr() is a 64-bit
> format PAR or a 32-bit one, use arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format().
>
> This is not really the correct answer, because the PAR format
> depends on the AT instruction being used, not just on the
> translation regime. However getting this correct requires a
> significant refactoring, so that get_phys_addr() returns raw
> information about the fault which the caller can then assemble
> into a suitable FSR/PAR/syndrome for its purposes, rather than
> get_phys_addr() returning a pre-formatted FSR.
>
> However this change at least improves the situation by making
> the PAR work correctly for address translation operations done
> at AArch64 EL2 on the EL2 translation regime. In particular,
> this is necessary for Xen to be able to run in our emulation,
> so this seems like a safer interim fix given that we are in freeze.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

As far as it goes it seems reasonable:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>

> ---
> I guess I should have a go at the "correct answer" I sketch
> above, but no promises about when I'll get time for that :-(
>
>  target/arm/helper.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 96113fe..37af750 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -2162,7 +2162,7 @@ static uint64_t do_ats_write(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t value,
>
>      ret = get_phys_addr(env, value, access_type, mmu_idx,
>                          &phys_addr, &attrs, &prot, &page_size, &fsr, &fi);
> -    if (extended_addresses_enabled(env)) {
> +    if (arm_s1_regime_using_lpae_format(env, mmu_idx)) {
>          /* fsr is a DFSR/IFSR value for the long descriptor
>           * translation table format, but with WnR always clear.
>           * Convert it to a 64-bit PAR.


--
Alex Bennée

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-11-06 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-03 14:36 [Qemu-arm] [PATCH] arm: check regime, not current state, for ATS write PAR format Peter Maydell
2017-11-03 14:36 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2017-11-03 17:36 ` [Qemu-arm] " Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-03 17:36   ` Stefano Stabellini
2017-11-08 17:05   ` [Qemu-arm] " Edgar E. Iglesias
2017-11-08 17:05     ` Edgar E. Iglesias
2017-11-06 16:10 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-11-06 16:10   ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] " Alex Bennée

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87375rs80t.fsf@linaro.org \
    --to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=julien.grall@linaro.org \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.