From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87378jbmkg.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502280338-23002-12-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> This patch adds the core support for switching and managing the SVE
> architectural state of user tasks.
>
> Calls to the existing FPSIMD low-level save/restore functions are
> factored out as new functions task_fpsimd_{save,load}(), since SVE
> now dynamically may or may not need to be handled at these points
> depending on the kernel configuration, hardware features discovered
> at boot, and the runtime state of the task. To make these
> decisions as fast as possible, const cpucaps are used where
> feasible, via the system_supports_sve() helper.
>
> The SVE registers are only tracked for threads that have explicitly
> used SVE, indicated by the new thread flag TIF_SVE. Otherwise, the
> FPSIMD view of the architectural state is stored in
> thread.fpsimd_state as usual.
>
> When in use, the SVE registers are not stored directly in
> thread_struct due to their potentially large and variable size.
> Because the task_struct slab allocator must be configured very
> early during kernel boot, it is also tricky to configure it
> correctly to match the maximum vector length provided by the
> hardware, since this depends on examining secondary CPUs as well as
> the primary. Instead, a pointer sve_state in thread_struct points
> to a dynamically allocated buffer containing the SVE register data,
> and code is added to allocate, duplicate and free this buffer at
> appropriate times.
>
> TIF_SVE is set when taking an SVE access trap from userspace, if
> suitable hardware support has been detected. This enables SVE for
> the thread: a subsequent return to userspace will disable the trap
> accordingly. If such a trap is taken without sufficient hardware
> support, SIGILL is sent to the thread instead as if an undefined
> instruction had been executed: this may happen if userspace tries
> to use SVE in a system where not all CPUs support it for example.
>
> The kernel may clear TIF_SVE and disable SVE for the thread
> whenever an explicit syscall is made by userspace, though this is
> considered an optimisation opportunity rather than a deterministic
> guarantee: the kernel may not do this on every syscall, but it is
> permitted to do so. For backwards compatibility reasons and
> conformance with the spirit of the base AArch64 procedure call
> standard, the subset of the SVE register state that aliases the
> FPSIMD registers is still preserved across a syscall even if this
> happens.
>
> TIF_SVE is also cleared, and SVE disabled, on exec: this is an
> obvious slow path and a hint that we are running a new binary that
> may not use SVE.
>
> Code is added to sync data between thread.fpsimd_state and
> thread.sve_state whenever enabling/disabling SVE, in a manner
> consistent with the SVE architectural programmer's model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h | 19 +++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 14 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 6 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
> 8 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> index 026a7c7..72090a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +
> /*
> * FP/SIMD storage area has:
> * - FPSR and FPCR
> @@ -72,6 +74,23 @@ extern void sve_load_state(void const *state, u32 const *pfpsr,
> unsigned long vq_minus_1);
> extern unsigned int sve_get_vl(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE
> +
> +extern size_t sve_state_size(struct task_struct const *task);
> +
> +extern void sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task);
> +extern void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *task);
> +extern void fpsimd_dup_sve(struct task_struct *dst,
> + struct task_struct const *src);
> +
> +#else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +
> +static void __maybe_unused sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task) { }
> +static void __maybe_unused fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *task) { }
> +static void __maybe_unused fpsimd_dup_sve(struct task_struct *dst,
> + struct task_struct const *src) { }
> +#endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +
> /* For use by EFI runtime services calls only */
> extern void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void);
> extern void __efi_fpsimd_end(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index b7334f1..969feed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned long tp2_value;
> #endif
> struct fpsimd_state fpsimd_state;
> + void *sve_state; /* SVE registers, if any */
> + u16 sve_vl; /* SVE vector length */
sve_vl is implicitly cast to unsigned int bellow - it should be
consistent.
Given the allocation functions rely on sve_vl being valid it might be
worth noting where this is set/live from?
> unsigned long fault_address; /* fault info */
> unsigned long fault_code; /* ESR_EL1 value */
> struct debug_info debug; /* debugging */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 46c3b93..1a4b30b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
<snip>
And I see there are other comments from Ard.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@sourceware.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87378jbmkg.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170822162119.U2rNknHn6TxqRUx9xZsPj-m0tPbV_QuLLYH3Iue7mXI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502280338-23002-12-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> This patch adds the core support for switching and managing the SVE
> architectural state of user tasks.
>
> Calls to the existing FPSIMD low-level save/restore functions are
> factored out as new functions task_fpsimd_{save,load}(), since SVE
> now dynamically may or may not need to be handled at these points
> depending on the kernel configuration, hardware features discovered
> at boot, and the runtime state of the task. To make these
> decisions as fast as possible, const cpucaps are used where
> feasible, via the system_supports_sve() helper.
>
> The SVE registers are only tracked for threads that have explicitly
> used SVE, indicated by the new thread flag TIF_SVE. Otherwise, the
> FPSIMD view of the architectural state is stored in
> thread.fpsimd_state as usual.
>
> When in use, the SVE registers are not stored directly in
> thread_struct due to their potentially large and variable size.
> Because the task_struct slab allocator must be configured very
> early during kernel boot, it is also tricky to configure it
> correctly to match the maximum vector length provided by the
> hardware, since this depends on examining secondary CPUs as well as
> the primary. Instead, a pointer sve_state in thread_struct points
> to a dynamically allocated buffer containing the SVE register data,
> and code is added to allocate, duplicate and free this buffer at
> appropriate times.
>
> TIF_SVE is set when taking an SVE access trap from userspace, if
> suitable hardware support has been detected. This enables SVE for
> the thread: a subsequent return to userspace will disable the trap
> accordingly. If such a trap is taken without sufficient hardware
> support, SIGILL is sent to the thread instead as if an undefined
> instruction had been executed: this may happen if userspace tries
> to use SVE in a system where not all CPUs support it for example.
>
> The kernel may clear TIF_SVE and disable SVE for the thread
> whenever an explicit syscall is made by userspace, though this is
> considered an optimisation opportunity rather than a deterministic
> guarantee: the kernel may not do this on every syscall, but it is
> permitted to do so. For backwards compatibility reasons and
> conformance with the spirit of the base AArch64 procedure call
> standard, the subset of the SVE register state that aliases the
> FPSIMD registers is still preserved across a syscall even if this
> happens.
>
> TIF_SVE is also cleared, and SVE disabled, on exec: this is an
> obvious slow path and a hint that we are running a new binary that
> may not use SVE.
>
> Code is added to sync data between thread.fpsimd_state and
> thread.sve_state whenever enabling/disabling SVE, in a manner
> consistent with the SVE architectural programmer's model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h | 19 +++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 14 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 6 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
> 8 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> index 026a7c7..72090a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +
> /*
> * FP/SIMD storage area has:
> * - FPSR and FPCR
> @@ -72,6 +74,23 @@ extern void sve_load_state(void const *state, u32 const *pfpsr,
> unsigned long vq_minus_1);
> extern unsigned int sve_get_vl(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE
> +
> +extern size_t sve_state_size(struct task_struct const *task);
> +
> +extern void sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task);
> +extern void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *task);
> +extern void fpsimd_dup_sve(struct task_struct *dst,
> + struct task_struct const *src);
> +
> +#else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +
> +static void __maybe_unused sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task) { }
> +static void __maybe_unused fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *task) { }
> +static void __maybe_unused fpsimd_dup_sve(struct task_struct *dst,
> + struct task_struct const *src) { }
> +#endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +
> /* For use by EFI runtime services calls only */
> extern void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void);
> extern void __efi_fpsimd_end(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index b7334f1..969feed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned long tp2_value;
> #endif
> struct fpsimd_state fpsimd_state;
> + void *sve_state; /* SVE registers, if any */
> + u16 sve_vl; /* SVE vector length */
sve_vl is implicitly cast to unsigned int bellow - it should be
consistent.
Given the allocation functions rely on sve_vl being valid it might be
worth noting where this is set/live from?
> unsigned long fault_address; /* fault info */
> unsigned long fault_code; /* ESR_EL1 value */
> struct debug_info debug; /* debugging */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 46c3b93..1a4b30b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
<snip>
And I see there are other comments from Ard.
--
Alex Bennée
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alex.bennee@linaro.org (Alex Bennée)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:21:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87378jbmkg.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1502280338-23002-12-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> writes:
> This patch adds the core support for switching and managing the SVE
> architectural state of user tasks.
>
> Calls to the existing FPSIMD low-level save/restore functions are
> factored out as new functions task_fpsimd_{save,load}(), since SVE
> now dynamically may or may not need to be handled at these points
> depending on the kernel configuration, hardware features discovered
> at boot, and the runtime state of the task. To make these
> decisions as fast as possible, const cpucaps are used where
> feasible, via the system_supports_sve() helper.
>
> The SVE registers are only tracked for threads that have explicitly
> used SVE, indicated by the new thread flag TIF_SVE. Otherwise, the
> FPSIMD view of the architectural state is stored in
> thread.fpsimd_state as usual.
>
> When in use, the SVE registers are not stored directly in
> thread_struct due to their potentially large and variable size.
> Because the task_struct slab allocator must be configured very
> early during kernel boot, it is also tricky to configure it
> correctly to match the maximum vector length provided by the
> hardware, since this depends on examining secondary CPUs as well as
> the primary. Instead, a pointer sve_state in thread_struct points
> to a dynamically allocated buffer containing the SVE register data,
> and code is added to allocate, duplicate and free this buffer at
> appropriate times.
>
> TIF_SVE is set when taking an SVE access trap from userspace, if
> suitable hardware support has been detected. This enables SVE for
> the thread: a subsequent return to userspace will disable the trap
> accordingly. If such a trap is taken without sufficient hardware
> support, SIGILL is sent to the thread instead as if an undefined
> instruction had been executed: this may happen if userspace tries
> to use SVE in a system where not all CPUs support it for example.
>
> The kernel may clear TIF_SVE and disable SVE for the thread
> whenever an explicit syscall is made by userspace, though this is
> considered an optimisation opportunity rather than a deterministic
> guarantee: the kernel may not do this on every syscall, but it is
> permitted to do so. For backwards compatibility reasons and
> conformance with the spirit of the base AArch64 procedure call
> standard, the subset of the SVE register state that aliases the
> FPSIMD registers is still preserved across a syscall even if this
> happens.
>
> TIF_SVE is also cleared, and SVE disabled, on exec: this is an
> obvious slow path and a hint that we are running a new binary that
> may not use SVE.
>
> Code is added to sync data between thread.fpsimd_state and
> thread.sve_state whenever enabling/disabling SVE, in a manner
> consistent with the SVE architectural programmer's model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h | 19 +++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h | 2 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 14 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/fpsimd.c | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 6 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 4 +-
> 8 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> index 026a7c7..72090a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/fpsimd.h
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +
> /*
> * FP/SIMD storage area has:
> * - FPSR and FPCR
> @@ -72,6 +74,23 @@ extern void sve_load_state(void const *state, u32 const *pfpsr,
> unsigned long vq_minus_1);
> extern unsigned int sve_get_vl(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SVE
> +
> +extern size_t sve_state_size(struct task_struct const *task);
> +
> +extern void sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task);
> +extern void fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *task);
> +extern void fpsimd_dup_sve(struct task_struct *dst,
> + struct task_struct const *src);
> +
> +#else /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +
> +static void __maybe_unused sve_alloc(struct task_struct *task) { }
> +static void __maybe_unused fpsimd_release_thread(struct task_struct *task) { }
> +static void __maybe_unused fpsimd_dup_sve(struct task_struct *dst,
> + struct task_struct const *src) { }
> +#endif /* ! CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +
> /* For use by EFI runtime services calls only */
> extern void __efi_fpsimd_begin(void);
> extern void __efi_fpsimd_end(void);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> index b7334f1..969feed 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@ struct thread_struct {
> unsigned long tp2_value;
> #endif
> struct fpsimd_state fpsimd_state;
> + void *sve_state; /* SVE registers, if any */
> + u16 sve_vl; /* SVE vector length */
sve_vl is implicitly cast to unsigned int bellow - it should be
consistent.
Given the allocation functions rely on sve_vl being valid it might be
worth noting where this is set/live from?
> unsigned long fault_address; /* fault info */
> unsigned long fault_code; /* ESR_EL1 value */
> struct debug_info debug; /* debugging */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> index 46c3b93..1a4b30b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/thread_info.h
<snip>
And I see there are other comments from Ard.
--
Alex Benn?e
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-22 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 204+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-09 12:05 [PATCH 00/27] ARM Scalable Vector Extension (SVE) Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 01/27] regset: Add support for dynamically sized regsets Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-18 11:52 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 11:52 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 11:52 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 02/27] arm64: KVM: Hide unsupported AArch64 CPU features from guests Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 20:32 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 20:32 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 8:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-17 8:45 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-17 9:57 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 9:57 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 9:57 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 03/27] arm64: efi: Add missing Kconfig dependency on KERNEL_MODE_NEON Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-18 12:02 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 12:02 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 12:02 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 04/27] arm64: Port deprecated instruction emulation to new sysctl interface Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-18 12:09 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 12:09 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 12:09 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 05/27] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set,clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 05/27] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag() Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/27] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set,clear}_ti_thread_flag() Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-15 17:11 ` [PATCH 05/27] arm64: fpsimd: Simplify uses of {set, clear}_ti_thread_flag() Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-18 16:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 16:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-18 16:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 06/27] arm64/sve: System register and exception syndrome definitions Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 9:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 9:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 12:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 12:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 12:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:26 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 14:26 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 14:50 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:50 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:50 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 15:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 15:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 15:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 15:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 15:34 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 13:56 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 13:56 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 14:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:36 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 07/27] arm64/sve: Low-level SVE architectural state manipulation functions Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 10:11 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 14:38 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 08/27] arm64/sve: Kconfig update and conditional compilation support Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-21 10:12 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 10:12 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-21 10:12 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 09/27] arm64/sve: Signal frame and context structure definition Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 10:22 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 10:22 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 11:17 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 13:53 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 14:21 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 14:21 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 14:21 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 15:03 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:03 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:03 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:41 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 15:41 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 10/27] arm64/sve: Low-level CPU setup Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 15:04 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:04 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:04 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 15:33 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 11/27] arm64/sve: Core task context handling Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-15 17:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-16 10:40 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 10:40 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 16:42 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 16:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-17 16:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-22 16:21 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2017-08-22 16:21 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 16:21 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 17:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 17:19 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 18:39 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 18:39 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 18:39 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 12/27] arm64/sve: Support vector length resetting for new processes Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 16:22 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 16:22 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-22 17:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-22 17:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 13/27] arm64/sve: Signal handling support Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-23 9:38 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 9:38 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 9:38 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 11:30 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-23 11:30 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 14/27] arm64/sve: Backend logic for setting the vector length Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-23 15:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 15:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 15:33 ` Alex Bennée
2017-08-23 17:29 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-23 17:29 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 15/27] arm64/sve: Probe SVE capabilities and usable vector lengths Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 17:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-16 17:48 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-17 10:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 10:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 10:04 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 10:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-17 10:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-17 10:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 16/27] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around kernel-mode NEON use Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-15 17:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-15 17:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 17/27] arm64/sve: Preserve SVE registers around EFI runtime service calls Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-15 17:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-15 17:44 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-08-16 9:13 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 9:13 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 18/27] arm64/sve: ptrace and ELF coredump support Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 19/27] arm64/sve: Add prctl controls for userspace vector length management Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 20/27] arm64/sve: Add sysctl to set the default vector length for new processes Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 21/27] arm64/sve: KVM: Prevent guests from using SVE Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-15 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 10:50 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 10:50 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:20 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:35 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:35 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 22/27] arm64/sve: KVM: Treat guest SVE use as undefined instruction execution Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 23/27] arm64/sve: KVM: Hide SVE from CPU features exposed to guests Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-15 16:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-15 16:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 10:54 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 10:54 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-08-16 11:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 11:22 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 24/27] arm64/sve: Detect SVE and activate runtime support Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-16 17:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-16 17:53 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2017-08-17 10:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 10:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-17 10:00 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [PATCH 25/27] arm64/sve: Add documentation Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH 26/27] arm64: signal: Report signal frame size to userspace via auxv Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` [RFC PATCH 27/27] arm64/sve: signal: Include SVE when computing AT_MINSIGSTKSZ Dave Martin
2017-08-09 12:05 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87378jbmkg.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.