All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] virtio_net: pass vi around
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:57:31 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738a9avik.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414099656-28090-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> Too many places poke at [rs]q->vq->vdev->priv just to get
> the the vi structure.  Let's just pass the pointer around: seems
> cleaner, and might even be faster.

Agreed, it's neater.

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Thanks,
Rusty.

>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 57cbc7d..36f3dfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -241,11 +241,11 @@ static unsigned long mergeable_buf_to_ctx(void *buf, unsigned int truesize)
>  }
>  
>  /* Called from bottom half context */
> -static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct receive_queue *rq,
> +static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> +				   struct receive_queue *rq,
>  				   struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
>  				   unsigned int len, unsigned int truesize)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
>  	unsigned int copy, hdr_len, hdr_padded_len;
> @@ -328,12 +328,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(void *buf, unsigned int len)
>  }
>  
>  static struct sk_buff *receive_big(struct net_device *dev,
> +				   struct virtnet_info *vi,
>  				   struct receive_queue *rq,
>  				   void *buf,
>  				   unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	struct page *page = buf;
> -	struct sk_buff *skb = page_to_skb(rq, page, 0, len, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = page_to_skb(vi, rq, page, 0, len, PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!skb))
>  		goto err;
> @@ -359,7 +360,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>  	int offset = buf - page_address(page);
>  	unsigned int truesize = max(len, mergeable_ctx_to_buf_truesize(ctx));
>  
> -	struct sk_buff *head_skb = page_to_skb(rq, page, offset, len, truesize);
> +	struct sk_buff *head_skb = page_to_skb(vi, rq, page, offset, len,
> +					       truesize);
>  	struct sk_buff *curr_skb = head_skb;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!curr_skb))
> @@ -433,9 +435,9 @@ err_buf:
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
> +static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> +			void *buf, unsigned int len)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>  	struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> @@ -459,9 +461,9 @@ static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
>  	if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
>  		skb = receive_mergeable(dev, vi, rq, (unsigned long)buf, len);
>  	else if (vi->big_packets)
> -		skb = receive_big(dev, rq, buf, len);
> +		skb = receive_big(dev, vi, rq, buf, len);
>  	else
> -		skb = receive_small(buf, len);
> +		skb = receive_small(vi, buf, len);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!skb))
>  		return;
> @@ -530,9 +532,9 @@ frame_err:
>  	dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>  }
>  
> -static int add_recvbuf_small(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> +static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> +			     gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
>  	int err;
> @@ -655,9 +657,9 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
>   * before we're receiving packets, or from refill_work which is
>   * careful to disable receiving (using napi_disable).
>   */
> -static bool try_fill_recv(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> +static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> +			  gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	int err;
>  	bool oom;
>  
> @@ -668,7 +670,7 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
>  		else if (vi->big_packets)
>  			err = add_recvbuf_big(rq, gfp);
>  		else
> -			err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
> +			err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
>  
>  		oom = err == -ENOMEM;
>  		if (err)
> @@ -717,7 +719,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
>  
>  		napi_disable(&rq->napi);
> -		still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
>  
>  		/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
> @@ -736,12 +738,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
>  
>  	while (received < budget &&
>  	       (buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> -		receive_buf(rq, buf, len);
> +		receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len);
>  		received++;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (rq->vq->num_free > virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq) / 2) {
> -		if (!try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +		if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
>  			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -817,7 +819,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>  			/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> -			if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> +			if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
>  				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>  		virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
>  	}
> -- 
> MST

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] virtio_net: pass vi around
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:57:31 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8738a9avik.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1414099656-28090-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>

"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> writes:
> Too many places poke at [rs]q->vq->vdev->priv just to get
> the the vi structure.  Let's just pass the pointer around: seems
> cleaner, and might even be faster.

Agreed, it's neater.

Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Thanks,
Rusty.

>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 57cbc7d..36f3dfc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -241,11 +241,11 @@ static unsigned long mergeable_buf_to_ctx(void *buf, unsigned int truesize)
>  }
>  
>  /* Called from bottom half context */
> -static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct receive_queue *rq,
> +static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
> +				   struct receive_queue *rq,
>  				   struct page *page, unsigned int offset,
>  				   unsigned int len, unsigned int truesize)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
>  	unsigned int copy, hdr_len, hdr_padded_len;
> @@ -328,12 +328,13 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(void *buf, unsigned int len)
>  }
>  
>  static struct sk_buff *receive_big(struct net_device *dev,
> +				   struct virtnet_info *vi,
>  				   struct receive_queue *rq,
>  				   void *buf,
>  				   unsigned int len)
>  {
>  	struct page *page = buf;
> -	struct sk_buff *skb = page_to_skb(rq, page, 0, len, PAGE_SIZE);
> +	struct sk_buff *skb = page_to_skb(vi, rq, page, 0, len, PAGE_SIZE);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!skb))
>  		goto err;
> @@ -359,7 +360,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
>  	int offset = buf - page_address(page);
>  	unsigned int truesize = max(len, mergeable_ctx_to_buf_truesize(ctx));
>  
> -	struct sk_buff *head_skb = page_to_skb(rq, page, offset, len, truesize);
> +	struct sk_buff *head_skb = page_to_skb(vi, rq, page, offset, len,
> +					       truesize);
>  	struct sk_buff *curr_skb = head_skb;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!curr_skb))
> @@ -433,9 +435,9 @@ err_buf:
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
> +static void receive_buf(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> +			void *buf, unsigned int len)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct net_device *dev = vi->dev;
>  	struct virtnet_stats *stats = this_cpu_ptr(vi->stats);
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
> @@ -459,9 +461,9 @@ static void receive_buf(struct receive_queue *rq, void *buf, unsigned int len)
>  	if (vi->mergeable_rx_bufs)
>  		skb = receive_mergeable(dev, vi, rq, (unsigned long)buf, len);
>  	else if (vi->big_packets)
> -		skb = receive_big(dev, rq, buf, len);
> +		skb = receive_big(dev, vi, rq, buf, len);
>  	else
> -		skb = receive_small(buf, len);
> +		skb = receive_small(vi, buf, len);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!skb))
>  		return;
> @@ -530,9 +532,9 @@ frame_err:
>  	dev_kfree_skb(skb);
>  }
>  
> -static int add_recvbuf_small(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> +static int add_recvbuf_small(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> +			     gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	struct sk_buff *skb;
>  	struct skb_vnet_hdr *hdr;
>  	int err;
> @@ -655,9 +657,9 @@ static int add_recvbuf_mergeable(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
>   * before we're receiving packets, or from refill_work which is
>   * careful to disable receiving (using napi_disable).
>   */
> -static bool try_fill_recv(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
> +static bool try_fill_recv(struct virtnet_info *vi, struct receive_queue *rq,
> +			  gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
>  	int err;
>  	bool oom;
>  
> @@ -668,7 +670,7 @@ static bool try_fill_recv(struct receive_queue *rq, gfp_t gfp)
>  		else if (vi->big_packets)
>  			err = add_recvbuf_big(rq, gfp);
>  		else
> -			err = add_recvbuf_small(rq, gfp);
> +			err = add_recvbuf_small(vi, rq, gfp);
>  
>  		oom = err == -ENOMEM;
>  		if (err)
> @@ -717,7 +719,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  		struct receive_queue *rq = &vi->rq[i];
>  
>  		napi_disable(&rq->napi);
> -		still_empty = !try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		still_empty = !try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL);
>  		virtnet_napi_enable(rq);
>  
>  		/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
> @@ -736,12 +738,12 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget)
>  
>  	while (received < budget &&
>  	       (buf = virtqueue_get_buf(rq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> -		receive_buf(rq, buf, len);
> +		receive_buf(vi, rq, buf, len);
>  		received++;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (rq->vq->num_free > virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq) / 2) {
> -		if (!try_fill_recv(rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
> +		if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
>  			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -817,7 +819,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  	for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
>  		if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
>  			/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> -			if (!try_fill_recv(&vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> +			if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
>  				schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>  		virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
>  	}
> -- 
> MST

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-28  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-23 21:27 [PATCH RFC 1/4] virtio_net: pass vi around Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:28 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] virtio_net: get rid of virtio_net_hdr/skb_vnet_hdr Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:28   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:28   ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] virtio_net: stricter short buffer length checks Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:28     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:28     ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] virtio_net: bigger header when VERSION_1 is set Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-23 21:28       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-28  0:28       ` Rusty Russell
2014-10-28  0:28         ` Rusty Russell
2014-10-28  0:27   ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] virtio_net: get rid of virtio_net_hdr/skb_vnet_hdr Rusty Russell
2014-10-28  0:27     ` Rusty Russell
2014-10-24 10:02 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] virtio_net: pass vi around David Laight
2014-10-24 10:02   ` David Laight
2014-10-24 14:10   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-24 14:10     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-10-28  0:27 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2014-10-28  0:27   ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8738a9avik.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.