From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Cc: Robert Lee <rob.lee@linaro.org>,
len.brown@intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
robherring2@gmail.com, Baohua.Song@csr.com,
amit.kucheria@linaro.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com,
linux@maxim.org.za, kgene.kim@samsung.com,
amit.kachhap@linaro.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com, nsekhar@ti.com,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, mturquette@linaro.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org,
deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
nicolas.pitre@linaro.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
jean.pihet@newoldbits.com, venki@google.com, ccross@google.com,
g.trinabh@gmail.com, kernel@wantstofly.org, lethal@linux-sh.org,
jon-hunter@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:48:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873992zy5u.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203202158.08042.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:58:07 +0000")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> writes:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
>> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
>> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
>> disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
>> cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable().
>>
>> These changes have been pulled into linux-next.
>>
>> Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes?
>
> FWIW, Len seems to be rather inactive on the kernel mailing list right
> now and generally not very interested in anything outside of x86 and
> acpi. If he doesn't reply in the next few days and Andrew also isn't
> interested in handling these patches, I'd suggest you just send the pull
> request to Linus, with Len on Cc and explain that you tried to send
> them through him but gave up in the end.
FWIW, I have not had good luck getting response for proposed core
CPUidle changes either:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/19/374
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
not-so-distant future.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:48:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873992zy5u.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203202158.08042.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:58:07 +0000")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> writes:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
>> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
>> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
>> disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
>> cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable().
>>
>> These changes have been pulled into linux-next.
>>
>> Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes?
>
> FWIW, Len seems to be rather inactive on the kernel mailing list right
> now and generally not very interested in anything outside of x86 and
> acpi. If he doesn't reply in the next few days and Andrew also isn't
> interested in handling these patches, I'd suggest you just send the pull
> request to Linus, with Len on Cc and explain that you tried to send
> them through him but gave up in the end.
FWIW, I have not had good luck getting response for proposed core
CPUidle changes either:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/19/374
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
not-so-distant future.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:48:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873992zy5u.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203202158.08042.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2012 21:58:07 +0000")
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> writes:
> On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
>> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
>> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
>> disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
>> cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable().
>>
>> These changes have been pulled into linux-next.
>>
>> Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes?
>
> FWIW, Len seems to be rather inactive on the kernel mailing list right
> now and generally not very interested in anything outside of x86 and
> acpi. If he doesn't reply in the next few days and Andrew also isn't
> interested in handling these patches, I'd suggest you just send the pull
> request to Linus, with Len on Cc and explain that you tried to send
> them through him but gave up in the end.
FWIW, I have not had good luck getting response for proposed core
CPUidle changes either:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/19/374
Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer. With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
not-so-distant future.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-20 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-20 20:22 [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] cpuidle: Add common time keeping and irq enabling Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] ARM: at91: Consolidate time keeping and irq enable Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] ARM: kirkwood: " Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] ARM: davinci: " Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-21 14:28 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:28 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:28 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:28 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-21 14:36 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-21 15:37 ` Nori, Sekhar
2012-03-21 15:37 ` Nori, Sekhar
2012-03-21 15:33 ` Nori, Sekhar
2012-03-21 15:33 ` Nori, Sekhar
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] ARM: omap: Consolidate OMAP3 " Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] ARM: omap: Consolidate OMAP4 " Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] ARM: shmobile: Consolidate " Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] SH: " Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 20:22 ` Robert Lee
2012-03-20 21:58 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 21:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 21:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 21:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 22:48 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2012-03-20 22:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-20 22:48 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-20 23:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 23:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 23:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-20 23:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-20 23:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-20 23:56 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-20 23:06 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-20 23:06 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-20 23:06 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-20 23:06 ` Amit Kucheria
2012-03-20 23:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-21 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-21 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-21 0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-03-21 2:38 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-03-21 2:50 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-03-21 2:38 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-03-21 2:38 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2012-03-21 4:53 ` Len Brown
2012-03-21 4:53 ` Len Brown
2012-03-21 4:53 ` Len Brown
2012-03-21 4:53 ` Len Brown
2012-03-21 2:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 2:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 2:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 2:23 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 0:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-21 0:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-21 0:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-21 1:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 1:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 1:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 1:45 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-03-21 4:45 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 4:45 ` Rob Lee
2012-03-21 4:45 ` Rob Lee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=873992zy5u.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=Baohua.Song@csr.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=ccross@google.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=g.trinabh@gmail.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rob.lee@linaro.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.