All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: agruen@kernel.org, bfields@fieldses.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:13:40 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739ep7cz7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BCAE5666-30A1-484A-9808-B52E5B422A3F@dilger.ca>

On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 12:41:15 -0600, Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> wrote:
> On 2011-10-18, at 9:33 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Support the richacl permission model in ext4.  The richacls are stored
> > in "system.richacl" xattrs.This need to be enabled by tune2fs or during
> > mkfs.ext4
> 
> It isn't clear from your commit comment or the code what needs to be enabled by tune2fs or mkfs.ext4.  Please list the specific ext4 feature
> that needs to be enabled.


The last patch explains the feature flag details 
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1204873

I am adding a new compat feature flag to indicate richacl is
enabled.

> 
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_EXT4_FS_RICHACL
> > +#define EXT4_IS_RICHACL(inode) IS_RICHACL(inode)
> > 
> 
> > +#else  /* CONFIG_FS_EXT4_RICHACL */
> > +
> > +#define EXT4_IS_RICHACL(inode) (0)
> 
> It is a bit confusing that you are using both EXT4_IS_RICHACL() and
> IS_RICHACL() in this code.  Initially I thought EXT4_IS_RICHACL() was
> checking an ext4-specific inode flag, but it seems that it is instead
> conditional upon the configure flags.
> 

The reason is to not do the superblock flag check when EXT4_FS_RICHACL is not
enabled.


> It looks like it should be possible to use EXT4_IS_RICHACL() in all
> of the code, since the richacl-specific code will not be compiled
> anyway.
> 

The reasoning is, all richacl specific code do check for whether
MS_RICHACL is enabled or not and the common file system code does
something similar to EXT4_IS_RICHACL() that is (0) when the file
system is not compiled with richacl option.

-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-18 15:32 [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 01/26] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 02/26] vfs: Add hex format for MAY_* flag values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 03/26] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 04/26] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 05/26] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 06/26] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 07/26] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 08/26] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 16:42   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20  5:20     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20  5:20       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 09/26] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:09   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20  7:35     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20  7:35       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20  8:11       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 10/26] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 11/26] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 12/26] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 13/26] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 15/26] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 16/26] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 17/26] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 18/26] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 19/26] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 20/26] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:20   ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20  8:30     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20  9:14       ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20  9:19         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 10:25           ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 10:25             ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 23:46             ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-20 23:46               ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21  0:45               ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-21  9:40               ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21  9:40                 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 10:52                 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21 13:12                   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 23:58                     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-20 11:02           ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 11:02             ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 17:49             ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 17:49               ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 19:49               ` Andreas Dilger
2011-11-19  9:35                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-19  9:28               ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-21 13:35                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 22/26] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 23/26] vfs: Add richacl permission check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 24/26] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 18:41   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-10-19  5:43     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 26/26] ext4: Add Ext4 compat richacl feature flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 16:17 ` [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Shea Levy
2011-10-19  5:54   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8739ep7cz7.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=agruen@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.