From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:10:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nz265tq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319154390.2270.52.camel@schurl.linbit>
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:46:29 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 06:25 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:19:46AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:14:34AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > > > Does it really make sense to use a string here just to pick between the
> > > > > > three choices OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@? Why not just another small
> > > > > > integer? Is the goal to expand this somehow eventually?
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > I guess Andreas wanted the disk layout to be able to store user@domain
> > > > > format if needed.
>
> Yep. On the other hand, none of the code won't actually allow to use
> user@domain identifiers, it won't help with other identifier types like
> Windows SIDs, and it doesn't make the code any prettier, so this should
> probably go away.
>
> > > > Is that likely? For that to be useful, tasks would need to be able to
> > > > run as user@domain strings. And we'd probably want owners and groups to
> > > > also be user@domain strings.
>
> I really don't see this happen anytime soon, and likely not at all.
>
> > > > The container people seem to eventually want to add some kind of
> > > > namespace identifier everywhere:
> > > >
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131836778427871&w=2
> > > >
> > > > in which case I guess we'd likely end up with (uid, user namespace id)
> > > > instead of user@domain?
>
> The filesystem still wouldn't have namespace ids for the owner and
> owning group, which is a much bigger issue. I think we're safe not to
> worry about namespace ids at this point; they also might never happen.
>
> > > Storing strings is an extremly stupid idea. The only thing that would
> > > make sense would be storing a windows-style 128-bit GUID.
> > >
> >
> > So if we want to do this without strings:
> >
> > > > > +struct richace_xattr {
> > > > > + __le16 e_type;
> > > > > + __le16 e_flags;
> > > > > + __le32 e_mask;
> > > > > + __le32 e_id;
> > > > > + char e_who[0];
> >
> > We could drop that last field and use some predefined values for e_id to
> > represent owner/group/everyone in the e_type == ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO case.
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> There seems to be a WELL_KNOWN_SID_TYPE enumeration which maps those
> kinds of special identifiers to small integers in Windows; maybe it
> makes sense to use the same numbers for OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@.
>
> > Then I'm not sure how you'd extend it if you later decided to add
> > Windows GUID's or whatever.
> >
> > But maybe it's not realistic to expect to be able to do that without a
> > new interface and on-disk format: how could old software be expected to
> > deal with acls that didn't use uid's?
>
> The acl itself has a version field, so new formats could be introduced
> in the future with a new version.
How about the below change. This will require richacl tools change
also. I made the e_flags 32 bit to make sure we don't take the space
needed NFSv4 ACL related flags.
diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 9a57039..9179fcd 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -20,19 +20,6 @@
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-/*
- * Special e_who identifiers: ACEs which have ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO set in
- * ace->e_flags use these constants in ace->u.e_who.
- *
- * For efficiency, we compare pointers instead of comparing strings.
- */
-const char richace_owner_who[] = "OWNER@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_owner_who);
-const char richace_group_who[] = "GROUP@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_group_who);
-const char richace_everyone_who[] = "EVERYONE@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_everyone_who);
-
/**
* richacl_alloc - allocate a richacl
* @count: number of entries
@@ -191,41 +178,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_want_to_mask);
int
richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *a, const struct richace *b)
{
-#define WHO_FLAGS (ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
+#define WHO_FLAGS (ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | ACE4_UNIXID_WHO | ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
if ((a->e_flags & WHO_FLAGS) != (b->e_flags & WHO_FLAGS))
return 0;
- if (a->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO)
- return a->u.e_who == b->u.e_who;
- else
- return a->u.e_id == b->u.e_id;
+ return a->e_id == b->e_id;
#undef WHO_FLAGS
}
/**
- * richacl_set_who - set a special who value
- * @ace: acl entry
- * @who: who value to use
- */
-int
-richace_set_who(struct richace *ace, const char *who)
-{
- if (!strcmp(who, richace_owner_who))
- who = richace_owner_who;
- else if (!strcmp(who, richace_group_who))
- who = richace_group_who;
- else if (!strcmp(who, richace_everyone_who))
- who = richace_everyone_who;
- else
- return -EINVAL;
-
- ace->u.e_who = who;
- ace->e_flags |= ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO;
- ace->e_flags &= ~ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_set_who);
-
-/**
* richacl_allowed_to_who - mask flags allowed to a specific who value
*
* Computes the mask values allowed to a specific who value, taking
@@ -446,10 +406,10 @@ richacl_permission(struct inode *inode, const struct richacl *acl,
continue;
} else if (richace_is_unix_id(ace)) {
if (ace->e_flags & ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP) {
- if (!in_group_p(ace->u.e_id))
+ if (!in_group_p(ace->e_id))
continue;
} else {
- if (current_fsuid() != ace->u.e_id)
+ if (current_fsuid() != ace->e_id)
continue;
}
} else
diff --git a/fs/richacl_xattr.c b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
index 02a7986..3f1f557 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_xattr.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
@@ -58,19 +58,14 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
goto fail_einval;
richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
- const char *who = (void *)(xattr_ace + 1), *end;
- ssize_t used = (void *)who - value;
- if (used > size)
- goto fail_einval;
- end = memchr(who, 0, size - used);
- if (!end)
+ if (((void *)xattr_ace + sizeof(*xattr_ace)) > value + size)
goto fail_einval;
- ace->e_type = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_type);
- ace->e_flags = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_flags);
- ace->e_mask = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_mask);
- ace->u.e_id = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_id);
+ ace->e_type = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_type);
+ ace->e_flags = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_flags);
+ ace->e_mask = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_mask);
+ ace->e_id = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_id);
if (ace->e_flags & ~ACE4_VALID_FLAGS)
goto fail_einval;
@@ -78,13 +73,7 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
(ace->e_mask & ~ACE4_VALID_MASK))
goto fail_einval;
- if (who == end) {
- if (ace->u.e_id == -1)
- goto fail_einval; /* uid/gid needed */
- } else if (richace_set_who(ace, who))
- goto fail_einval;
-
- xattr_ace = (void *)who + ALIGN(end - who + 1, 4);
+ xattr_ace = xattr_ace + 1;
}
return acl;
@@ -102,13 +91,8 @@ size_t
richacl_xattr_size(const struct richacl *acl)
{
size_t size = sizeof(struct richacl_xattr);
- const struct richace *ace;
- richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
- size += sizeof(struct richace_xattr) +
- (richace_is_unix_id(ace) ? 4 :
- ALIGN(strlen(ace->u.e_who) + 1, 4));
- }
+ size += sizeof(struct richace_xattr) * acl->a_count;
return size;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_xattr_size);
@@ -136,21 +120,11 @@ richacl_to_xattr(const struct richacl *acl, void *buffer)
xattr_ace = (void *)(xattr_acl + 1);
richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
xattr_ace->e_type = cpu_to_le16(ace->e_type);
- xattr_ace->e_flags = cpu_to_le16(ace->e_flags &
+ xattr_ace->e_flags = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_flags &
ACE4_VALID_FLAGS);
xattr_ace->e_mask = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_mask);
- if (richace_is_unix_id(ace)) {
- xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(ace->u.e_id);
- memset(xattr_ace->e_who, 0, 4);
- xattr_ace = (void *)xattr_ace->e_who + 4;
- } else {
- int sz = ALIGN(strlen(ace->u.e_who) + 1, 4);
-
- xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(-1);
- memset(xattr_ace->e_who + sz - 4, 0, 4);
- strcpy(xattr_ace->e_who, ace->u.e_who);
- xattr_ace = (void *)xattr_ace->e_who + sz;
- }
+ xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_id);
+ xattr_ace = xattr_ace + 1;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_to_xattr);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 4af6d22..e4c5156 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -17,14 +17,15 @@
#define __RICHACL_H
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#define ACE_OWNER_ID 130
+#define ACE_GROUP_ID 131
+#define ACE_EVERYONE_ID 110
+
struct richace {
unsigned short e_type;
- unsigned short e_flags;
+ unsigned int e_flags;
unsigned int e_mask;
- union {
- unsigned int e_id;
- const char *e_who;
- } u;
+ unsigned int e_id;
};
struct richacl {
@@ -74,8 +75,10 @@ struct richacl {
/*#define ACE4_FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG 0x0020*/
#define ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP 0x0040
#define ACE4_INHERITED_ACE 0x0080
-/* in-memory representation only */
-#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO 0x4000
+/* richacl specific flag values */
+#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO 0x80000000
+#define ACE4_UNIXID_WHO 0x40000000
+
#define ACE4_VALID_FLAGS ( \
ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE | \
@@ -83,7 +86,9 @@ struct richacl {
ACE4_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE | \
ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE | \
ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP | \
- ACE4_INHERITED_ACE)
+ ACE4_INHERITED_ACE | \
+ ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | \
+ ACE4_UNIXID_WHO)
/* e_mask bitflags */
#define ACE4_READ_DATA 0x00000001
@@ -254,14 +259,6 @@ richacl_is_protected(const struct richacl *acl)
return acl->a_flags & ACL4_PROTECTED;
}
-/*
- * Special e_who identifiers: we use these pointer values in comparisons
- * instead of doing a strcmp.
- */
-extern const char richace_owner_who[];
-extern const char richace_group_who[];
-extern const char richace_everyone_who[];
-
/**
* richace_is_owner - check if @ace is an OWNER@ entry
*/
@@ -269,7 +266,7 @@ static inline int
richace_is_owner(const struct richace *ace)
{
return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
- ace->u.e_who == richace_owner_who;
+ ace->e_id == ACE_OWNER_ID;
}
/**
@@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ static inline int
richace_is_group(const struct richace *ace)
{
return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
- ace->u.e_who == richace_group_who;
+ ace->e_id == ACE_GROUP_ID;
}
/**
@@ -289,7 +286,7 @@ static inline int
richace_is_everyone(const struct richace *ace)
{
return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
- ace->u.e_who == richace_everyone_who;
+ ace->e_id == ACE_EVERYONE_ID;
}
/**
@@ -298,7 +295,7 @@ richace_is_everyone(const struct richace *ace)
static inline int
richace_is_unix_id(const struct richace *ace)
{
- return !(ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO);
+ return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_UNIXID_WHO);
}
/**
@@ -357,7 +354,7 @@ richace_is_deny(const struct richace *ace)
extern struct richacl *richacl_alloc(int);
extern int richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *,
const struct richace *);
-extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const char *);
+extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const u8*, u_int32_t);
extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *);
extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
index f79ec12..19cb61e 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
@@ -22,10 +22,9 @@
struct richace_xattr {
__le16 e_type;
- __le16 e_flags;
+ __le32 e_flags;
__le32 e_mask;
__le32 e_id;
- char e_who[0];
};
struct richacl_xattr {
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher
<agruen-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields"
<bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org,
dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:10:17 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874nz265tq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1319154390.2270.52.camel-AB3ohll6rUCZ4toXJV50QQ@public.gmane.org>
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:46:29 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 06:25 -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:19:46AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 05:14:34AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > > > Does it really make sense to use a string here just to pick between the
> > > > > > three choices OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@? Why not just another small
> > > > > > integer? Is the goal to expand this somehow eventually?
> > > > >
> > >
> > > > > I guess Andreas wanted the disk layout to be able to store user@domain
> > > > > format if needed.
>
> Yep. On the other hand, none of the code won't actually allow to use
> user@domain identifiers, it won't help with other identifier types like
> Windows SIDs, and it doesn't make the code any prettier, so this should
> probably go away.
>
> > > > Is that likely? For that to be useful, tasks would need to be able to
> > > > run as user@domain strings. And we'd probably want owners and groups to
> > > > also be user@domain strings.
>
> I really don't see this happen anytime soon, and likely not at all.
>
> > > > The container people seem to eventually want to add some kind of
> > > > namespace identifier everywhere:
> > > >
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131836778427871&w=2
> > > >
> > > > in which case I guess we'd likely end up with (uid, user namespace id)
> > > > instead of user@domain?
>
> The filesystem still wouldn't have namespace ids for the owner and
> owning group, which is a much bigger issue. I think we're safe not to
> worry about namespace ids at this point; they also might never happen.
>
> > > Storing strings is an extremly stupid idea. The only thing that would
> > > make sense would be storing a windows-style 128-bit GUID.
> > >
> >
> > So if we want to do this without strings:
> >
> > > > > +struct richace_xattr {
> > > > > + __le16 e_type;
> > > > > + __le16 e_flags;
> > > > > + __le32 e_mask;
> > > > > + __le32 e_id;
> > > > > + char e_who[0];
> >
> > We could drop that last field and use some predefined values for e_id to
> > represent owner/group/everyone in the e_type == ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO case.
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> There seems to be a WELL_KNOWN_SID_TYPE enumeration which maps those
> kinds of special identifiers to small integers in Windows; maybe it
> makes sense to use the same numbers for OWNER@, GROUP@, and EVERYONE@.
>
> > Then I'm not sure how you'd extend it if you later decided to add
> > Windows GUID's or whatever.
> >
> > But maybe it's not realistic to expect to be able to do that without a
> > new interface and on-disk format: how could old software be expected to
> > deal with acls that didn't use uid's?
>
> The acl itself has a version field, so new formats could be introduced
> in the future with a new version.
How about the below change. This will require richacl tools change
also. I made the e_flags 32 bit to make sure we don't take the space
needed NFSv4 ACL related flags.
diff --git a/fs/richacl_base.c b/fs/richacl_base.c
index 9a57039..9179fcd 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_base.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_base.c
@@ -20,19 +20,6 @@
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
-/*
- * Special e_who identifiers: ACEs which have ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO set in
- * ace->e_flags use these constants in ace->u.e_who.
- *
- * For efficiency, we compare pointers instead of comparing strings.
- */
-const char richace_owner_who[] = "OWNER@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_owner_who);
-const char richace_group_who[] = "GROUP@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_group_who);
-const char richace_everyone_who[] = "EVERYONE@";
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_everyone_who);
-
/**
* richacl_alloc - allocate a richacl
* @count: number of entries
@@ -191,41 +178,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_want_to_mask);
int
richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *a, const struct richace *b)
{
-#define WHO_FLAGS (ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
+#define WHO_FLAGS (ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | ACE4_UNIXID_WHO | ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP)
if ((a->e_flags & WHO_FLAGS) != (b->e_flags & WHO_FLAGS))
return 0;
- if (a->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO)
- return a->u.e_who == b->u.e_who;
- else
- return a->u.e_id == b->u.e_id;
+ return a->e_id == b->e_id;
#undef WHO_FLAGS
}
/**
- * richacl_set_who - set a special who value
- * @ace: acl entry
- * @who: who value to use
- */
-int
-richace_set_who(struct richace *ace, const char *who)
-{
- if (!strcmp(who, richace_owner_who))
- who = richace_owner_who;
- else if (!strcmp(who, richace_group_who))
- who = richace_group_who;
- else if (!strcmp(who, richace_everyone_who))
- who = richace_everyone_who;
- else
- return -EINVAL;
-
- ace->u.e_who = who;
- ace->e_flags |= ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO;
- ace->e_flags &= ~ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP;
- return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richace_set_who);
-
-/**
* richacl_allowed_to_who - mask flags allowed to a specific who value
*
* Computes the mask values allowed to a specific who value, taking
@@ -446,10 +406,10 @@ richacl_permission(struct inode *inode, const struct richacl *acl,
continue;
} else if (richace_is_unix_id(ace)) {
if (ace->e_flags & ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP) {
- if (!in_group_p(ace->u.e_id))
+ if (!in_group_p(ace->e_id))
continue;
} else {
- if (current_fsuid() != ace->u.e_id)
+ if (current_fsuid() != ace->e_id)
continue;
}
} else
diff --git a/fs/richacl_xattr.c b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
index 02a7986..3f1f557 100644
--- a/fs/richacl_xattr.c
+++ b/fs/richacl_xattr.c
@@ -58,19 +58,14 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
goto fail_einval;
richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
- const char *who = (void *)(xattr_ace + 1), *end;
- ssize_t used = (void *)who - value;
- if (used > size)
- goto fail_einval;
- end = memchr(who, 0, size - used);
- if (!end)
+ if (((void *)xattr_ace + sizeof(*xattr_ace)) > value + size)
goto fail_einval;
- ace->e_type = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_type);
- ace->e_flags = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_flags);
- ace->e_mask = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_mask);
- ace->u.e_id = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_id);
+ ace->e_type = le16_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_type);
+ ace->e_flags = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_flags);
+ ace->e_mask = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_mask);
+ ace->e_id = le32_to_cpu(xattr_ace->e_id);
if (ace->e_flags & ~ACE4_VALID_FLAGS)
goto fail_einval;
@@ -78,13 +73,7 @@ richacl_from_xattr(const void *value, size_t size)
(ace->e_mask & ~ACE4_VALID_MASK))
goto fail_einval;
- if (who == end) {
- if (ace->u.e_id == -1)
- goto fail_einval; /* uid/gid needed */
- } else if (richace_set_who(ace, who))
- goto fail_einval;
-
- xattr_ace = (void *)who + ALIGN(end - who + 1, 4);
+ xattr_ace = xattr_ace + 1;
}
return acl;
@@ -102,13 +91,8 @@ size_t
richacl_xattr_size(const struct richacl *acl)
{
size_t size = sizeof(struct richacl_xattr);
- const struct richace *ace;
- richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
- size += sizeof(struct richace_xattr) +
- (richace_is_unix_id(ace) ? 4 :
- ALIGN(strlen(ace->u.e_who) + 1, 4));
- }
+ size += sizeof(struct richace_xattr) * acl->a_count;
return size;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_xattr_size);
@@ -136,21 +120,11 @@ richacl_to_xattr(const struct richacl *acl, void *buffer)
xattr_ace = (void *)(xattr_acl + 1);
richacl_for_each_entry(ace, acl) {
xattr_ace->e_type = cpu_to_le16(ace->e_type);
- xattr_ace->e_flags = cpu_to_le16(ace->e_flags &
+ xattr_ace->e_flags = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_flags &
ACE4_VALID_FLAGS);
xattr_ace->e_mask = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_mask);
- if (richace_is_unix_id(ace)) {
- xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(ace->u.e_id);
- memset(xattr_ace->e_who, 0, 4);
- xattr_ace = (void *)xattr_ace->e_who + 4;
- } else {
- int sz = ALIGN(strlen(ace->u.e_who) + 1, 4);
-
- xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(-1);
- memset(xattr_ace->e_who + sz - 4, 0, 4);
- strcpy(xattr_ace->e_who, ace->u.e_who);
- xattr_ace = (void *)xattr_ace->e_who + sz;
- }
+ xattr_ace->e_id = cpu_to_le32(ace->e_id);
+ xattr_ace = xattr_ace + 1;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(richacl_to_xattr);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl.h b/include/linux/richacl.h
index 4af6d22..e4c5156 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl.h
@@ -17,14 +17,15 @@
#define __RICHACL_H
#include <linux/slab.h>
+#define ACE_OWNER_ID 130
+#define ACE_GROUP_ID 131
+#define ACE_EVERYONE_ID 110
+
struct richace {
unsigned short e_type;
- unsigned short e_flags;
+ unsigned int e_flags;
unsigned int e_mask;
- union {
- unsigned int e_id;
- const char *e_who;
- } u;
+ unsigned int e_id;
};
struct richacl {
@@ -74,8 +75,10 @@ struct richacl {
/*#define ACE4_FAILED_ACCESS_ACE_FLAG 0x0020*/
#define ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP 0x0040
#define ACE4_INHERITED_ACE 0x0080
-/* in-memory representation only */
-#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO 0x4000
+/* richacl specific flag values */
+#define ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO 0x80000000
+#define ACE4_UNIXID_WHO 0x40000000
+
#define ACE4_VALID_FLAGS ( \
ACE4_FILE_INHERIT_ACE | \
@@ -83,7 +86,9 @@ struct richacl {
ACE4_NO_PROPAGATE_INHERIT_ACE | \
ACE4_INHERIT_ONLY_ACE | \
ACE4_IDENTIFIER_GROUP | \
- ACE4_INHERITED_ACE)
+ ACE4_INHERITED_ACE | \
+ ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO | \
+ ACE4_UNIXID_WHO)
/* e_mask bitflags */
#define ACE4_READ_DATA 0x00000001
@@ -254,14 +259,6 @@ richacl_is_protected(const struct richacl *acl)
return acl->a_flags & ACL4_PROTECTED;
}
-/*
- * Special e_who identifiers: we use these pointer values in comparisons
- * instead of doing a strcmp.
- */
-extern const char richace_owner_who[];
-extern const char richace_group_who[];
-extern const char richace_everyone_who[];
-
/**
* richace_is_owner - check if @ace is an OWNER@ entry
*/
@@ -269,7 +266,7 @@ static inline int
richace_is_owner(const struct richace *ace)
{
return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
- ace->u.e_who == richace_owner_who;
+ ace->e_id == ACE_OWNER_ID;
}
/**
@@ -279,7 +276,7 @@ static inline int
richace_is_group(const struct richace *ace)
{
return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
- ace->u.e_who == richace_group_who;
+ ace->e_id == ACE_GROUP_ID;
}
/**
@@ -289,7 +286,7 @@ static inline int
richace_is_everyone(const struct richace *ace)
{
return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO) &&
- ace->u.e_who == richace_everyone_who;
+ ace->e_id == ACE_EVERYONE_ID;
}
/**
@@ -298,7 +295,7 @@ richace_is_everyone(const struct richace *ace)
static inline int
richace_is_unix_id(const struct richace *ace)
{
- return !(ace->e_flags & ACE4_SPECIAL_WHO);
+ return (ace->e_flags & ACE4_UNIXID_WHO);
}
/**
@@ -357,7 +354,7 @@ richace_is_deny(const struct richace *ace)
extern struct richacl *richacl_alloc(int);
extern int richace_is_same_identifier(const struct richace *,
const struct richace *);
-extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const char *);
+extern int richace_set_who(struct richace *, const u8*, u_int32_t);
extern int richacl_masks_to_mode(const struct richacl *);
extern unsigned int richacl_mode_to_mask(mode_t);
extern unsigned int richacl_want_to_mask(unsigned int);
diff --git a/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
index f79ec12..19cb61e 100644
--- a/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
+++ b/include/linux/richacl_xattr.h
@@ -22,10 +22,9 @@
struct richace_xattr {
__le16 e_type;
- __le16 e_flags;
+ __le32 e_flags;
__le32 e_mask;
__le32 e_id;
- char e_who[0];
};
struct richacl_xattr {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-21 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-18 15:32 [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 01/26] vfs: Indicate that the permission functions take all the MAY_* flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 02/26] vfs: Add hex format for MAY_* flag values Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 03/26] vfs: Pass all mask flags down to iop->check_acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 04/26] vfs: Add a comment to inode_permission() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 05/26] vfs: Add generic IS_ACL() test for acl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 06/26] vfs: Add IS_RICHACL() test for richacl support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 07/26] vfs: Optimize out IS_RICHACL() if CONFIG_FS_RICHACL is not defined Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 08/26] vfs: Add new file and directory create permission flags Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 16:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 5:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 5:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 09/26] vfs: Add delete child and delete self " Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 7:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 7:35 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 8:11 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 10/26] vfs: Make the inode passed to inode_change_ok non-const Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 11/26] vfs: Add permission flags for setting file attributes Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 12/26] vfs: Make acl_permission_check() work for richacls Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 13/26] richacl: In-memory representation and helper functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 14/26] richacl: Permission mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 15/26] richacl: Compute maximum file masks from an acl Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 16/26] richacl: Update the file masks in chmod() Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 17/26] richacl: Permission check algorithm Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 18/26] richacl: Create-time inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 19/26] richacl: Check if an acl is equivalent to a file mode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 20/26] richacl: Automatic Inheritance Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 21/26] richacl: xattr mapping functions Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:20 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 8:30 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 9:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 9:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 10:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 10:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 23:46 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-20 23:46 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21 0:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-21 9:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2011-10-21 9:40 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 10:52 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-21 13:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-21 23:58 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2011-10-20 11:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 11:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-20 17:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 17:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-20 19:49 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-11-19 9:35 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-19 9:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2011-11-21 13:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 22/26] vfs: Cache richacl in struct inode Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 23/26] vfs: Add richacl permission check Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:32 ` [PATCH -V7 24/26] ext4: Use IS_POSIXACL() to check for POSIX ACL support Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 25/26] ext4: Implement rich acl for ext4 Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 18:41 ` Andreas Dilger
2011-10-19 5:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 15:33 ` [PATCH -V7 26/26] ext4: Add Ext4 compat richacl feature flag Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-18 16:17 ` [PATCH -V7 00/26] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Shea Levy
2011-10-19 5:54 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2011-10-19 22:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874nz265tq.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=agruen@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.