From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: venki@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739fh29k5.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110927100202.16043.58669.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Deepthi Dharwar's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:38 +0530")
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Version 6 of this patch series dated 22nd Sept 2011 was
> Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> for OMAP specific parts.
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
minor: I think this should be a Tested-by from Jean. Since he was not on
the delivery path, it should not be a sign-off.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: venki@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:12:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739fh29k5.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110927100202.16043.58669.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Deepthi Dharwar's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:38 +0530")
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Version 6 of this patch series dated 22nd Sept 2011 was
> Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> for OMAP specific parts.
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
minor: I think this should be a Tested-by from Jean. Since he was not on
the delivery path, it should not be a sign-off.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:12:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8739fh29k5.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110927100202.16043.58669.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Deepthi Dharwar's message of "Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:38 +0530")
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Version 6 of this patch series dated 22nd Sept 2011 was
> Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> for OMAP specific parts.
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
minor: I think this should be a Tested-by from Jean. Since he was not on
the delivery path, it should not be a sign-off.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-27 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-27 10:02 [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:14 ` [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:02 ` [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/4] cpuidle: Move dev->last_residency update to driver enter routine; remove dev->last_state Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:14 ` [PATCH V7 1/4] cpuidle: Move dev->last_residency update to driver Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:02 ` [PATCH V7 1/4] cpuidle: Move dev->last_residency update to driver enter routine; remove dev->last_state Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:03 ` [PATCH V7 2/4] cpuidle: Remove CPUIDLE_FLAG_IGNORE and dev->prepare() Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:15 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:03 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:03 ` [PATCH V7 3/4] cpuidle: Split cpuidle_state structure and move per-cpu statistics fields Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:15 ` [PATCH V7 3/4] cpuidle: Split cpuidle_state structure and move Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:03 ` [PATCH V7 3/4] cpuidle: Split cpuidle_state structure and move per-cpu statistics fields Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:04 ` [PATCH V7 4/4] cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:16 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 10:04 ` Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-27 17:12 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-27 17:12 ` [PATCH V7 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics Kevin Hilman
2011-09-27 17:12 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8739fh29k5.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.