All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>,
	Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Keep reference to device descriptor
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2026 10:52:02 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ig3956l.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260904171419.E21DF1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org>

sashiko-bot@kernel.org writes:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] In test initialization, `xe->subplatform_desc` is incorrectly assigned a pointer to a sentinel element instead of `NULL` when no subplatform is matched.
> --
>
> commit 2fbc7ea3deaa915eef829a4c64ec08fac1f4a8a9
> Author: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
>
> drm/xe: Keep reference to device descriptor
>
> This patch stores a reference to the whole device descriptor and the
> matched subplatform descriptor within the xe_device structure. This
> change enables access to additional non-mutable device parameters.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
>> index 4965a01f6ba52..48d5ee478fe69 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_pci.c
>> @@ -374,6 +374,8 @@ int xe_pci_fake_device_init(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  		return -ENODEV;
>>  
>>  done:
>> +	xe->desc = desc;
>> +	xe->subplatform_desc = subplatform_desc;
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Will this assign a pointer to a sentinel element instead of NULL when no
> subplatform is matched?
>
> In xe_pci_fake_device_init(), the search loop terminates when it reaches the
> sentinel element:
>
> 	for (subplatform_desc = desc->subplatforms;
> 	     subplatform_desc && subplatform_desc->subplatform;
> 	     subplatform_desc++)
> 		if (subplatform_desc->subplatform == data->subplatform)
> 			break;
>
> If data->subplatform is XE_SUBPLATFORM_NONE, the loop exits with
> subplatform_desc pointing to the sentinel element of desc->subplatforms, not
> NULL. The subsequent check (!subplatform_desc) evaluates to false.
>
> By directly assigning this value to xe->subplatform_desc, the test mock
> environment now gets a non-NULL pointer (the sentinel) for devices without a
> subplatform. Could this create a state inconsistency with production code,
> causing tests checking if (xe->subplatform_desc) to falsely evaluate to
> true?

Sashiko seems to be right here. I think we could initialize
subplatform_desc to NULL and assign the one from the loop if we find a
match.

--
Gustavo Sousa

>
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260904170531.516-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-05 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-04 17:05 [PATCH 0/6] drm/xe/log: Relax location ID recognition Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-04 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] drm/xe: Drop unused parameter from xe_info_init Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-04 18:09   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-05 13:04   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-09-04 17:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/xe: Keep reference to device descriptor Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-04 17:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-05 13:52     ` Gustavo Sousa [this message]
2026-09-07 19:30       ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-11 11:25         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-11 16:36           ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-09-04 17:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/xe: Drop redundant parameters from xe_info_init_early Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-05 13:54   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-09-04 17:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/xe: Drop redundant parameter from xe_probe_info_early Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-05 13:55   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-09-04 17:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe: Drop redundant parameter from xe_probe_info and friends Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-05 13:58   ` Gustavo Sousa
2026-09-04 17:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/xe/log: Relax location ID recognition Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-04 18:44   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2026-09-09  9:00   ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-09  9:42     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-09 11:02       ` Mallesh, Koujalagi
2026-09-09 13:01         ` Michal Wajdeczko
2026-09-04 17:13 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2026-09-04 17:52 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-09-05  1:36 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ig3956l.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=gustavo.sousa@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=michal.wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.