From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com, airlied@gmail.com,
daniel@ffwll.ch, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
arun.r.murthy@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify switch to if-elseif
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 16:26:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jo3kwl6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523125116.1669057-1-trix@redhat.com>
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
> clang with W=1 reports
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6012:3: error: unannotated
> fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
> case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> ^
>
> Only one case and the default does anything in this switch, so it should
> be changed to an if-elseif.
Thanks for the patch.
If I wanted to fix this quickly, I'd just add the break in there.
If I wanted to fix this properly, I'd add a function
modifier_supports_async_flips() or something, and replace the switch
with:
if (!modifier_supports_async_flips(i915, new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
return -EINVAL;
}
But I wouldn't just replace the switch with if-elseif. It doesn't help
with the overall feeling that intel_async_flip_check_hw() is too long.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 0490c6412ab5..1f852e49fc20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5994,8 +5994,7 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
> * Need to verify this for all gen9 platforms to enable
> * this selectively if required.
> */
> - switch (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier) {
> - case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> + if (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
> /*
> * FIXME: Async on Linear buffer is supported on ICL as
> * but with additional alignment and fbc restrictions
> @@ -6008,13 +6007,10 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
> - break;
> - default:
> + } else if (!(new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com, airlied@gmail.com,
daniel@ffwll.ch, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
arun.r.murthy@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify switch to if-elseif
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 16:26:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jo3kwl6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523125116.1669057-1-trix@redhat.com>
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
> clang with W=1 reports
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6012:3: error: unannotated
> fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
> case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> ^
>
> Only one case and the default does anything in this switch, so it should
> be changed to an if-elseif.
Thanks for the patch.
If I wanted to fix this quickly, I'd just add the break in there.
If I wanted to fix this properly, I'd add a function
modifier_supports_async_flips() or something, and replace the switch
with:
if (!modifier_supports_async_flips(i915, new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
return -EINVAL;
}
But I wouldn't just replace the switch with if-elseif. It doesn't help
with the overall feeling that intel_async_flip_check_hw() is too long.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 0490c6412ab5..1f852e49fc20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5994,8 +5994,7 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
> * Need to verify this for all gen9 platforms to enable
> * this selectively if required.
> */
> - switch (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier) {
> - case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> + if (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
> /*
> * FIXME: Async on Linear buffer is supported on ICL as
> * but with additional alignment and fbc restrictions
> @@ -6008,13 +6007,10 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
> - break;
> - default:
> + } else if (!(new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com,
tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com, airlied@gmail.com,
daniel@ffwll.ch, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, imre.deak@intel.com,
arun.r.murthy@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@intel.com
Cc: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify switch to if-elseif
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 16:26:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874jo3kwl6.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230523125116.1669057-1-trix@redhat.com>
On Tue, 23 May 2023, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> wrote:
> clang with W=1 reports
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:6012:3: error: unannotated
> fall-through between switch labels [-Werror,-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
> case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> ^
>
> Only one case and the default does anything in this switch, so it should
> be changed to an if-elseif.
Thanks for the patch.
If I wanted to fix this quickly, I'd just add the break in there.
If I wanted to fix this properly, I'd add a function
modifier_supports_async_flips() or something, and replace the switch
with:
if (!modifier_supports_async_flips(i915, new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier)) {
drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm, "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
return -EINVAL;
}
But I wouldn't just replace the switch with if-elseif. It doesn't help
with the overall feeling that intel_async_flip_check_hw() is too long.
BR,
Jani.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 0490c6412ab5..1f852e49fc20 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -5994,8 +5994,7 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
> * Need to verify this for all gen9 platforms to enable
> * this selectively if required.
> */
> - switch (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier) {
> - case DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR:
> + if (new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR) {
> /*
> * FIXME: Async on Linear buffer is supported on ICL as
> * but with additional alignment and fbc restrictions
> @@ -6008,13 +6007,10 @@ static int intel_async_flip_check_hw(struct intel_atomic_state *state, struct in
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> -
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED:
> - case I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED:
> - break;
> - default:
> + } else if (!(new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED ||
> + new_plane_state->hw.fb->modifier == I915_FORMAT_MOD_4_TILED)) {
> drm_dbg_kms(&i915->drm,
> "[PLANE:%d:%s] Modifier does not support async flips\n",
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name);
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-23 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-23 12:51 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: simplify switch to if-elseif Tom Rix
2023-05-23 12:51 ` Tom Rix
2023-05-23 12:51 ` Tom Rix
2023-05-23 13:26 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2023-05-23 13:26 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-23 13:26 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-26 9:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jani Nikula
2023-05-23 21:43 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-05-24 4:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874jo3kwl6.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=arun.r.murthy@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.