From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Cc: "bhelgaas\@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi\@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"l.stach\@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
"andrew.smirnov\@gmail.com" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
"linux-pci\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lbi6ih4.fsf@tkos.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544681043-3792-1-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Hi Richard,
Thanks for debugging this issue. One question below.
Richard Zhu writes:
> MSI_EN of iMX PCIe RC would be asserted when
> PCIEPORTBUS driver is selected.
> Thus, the MSI works fine on iMX PCIe before.
> Make a double check on this bit, and assert it
> when it is not set and MSI is supported.
> Otherwise, the MSI wouldn't be triggered although
> the EP is present and the MSIs are assigned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 26087b3..6c3e56b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> #define PHY_PLL_LOCK_WAIT_USLEEP_MAX 200
>
> /* PCIe Root Complex registers (memory-mapped) */
> +#define PCI_MSI_CAP 0x50
> #define PCIE_RC_LCR 0x7c
> #define PCIE_RC_LCR_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS_GEN1 0x1
> #define PCIE_RC_LCR_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS_GEN2 0x2
> @@ -926,6 +927,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *dbi_base;
> struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> int ret;
> + u16 val;
>
> imx6_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*imx6_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!imx6_pcie)
> @@ -1070,6 +1072,14 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = imx6_add_pcie_port(imx6_pcie, pdev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> + val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, PCI_MSI_CAP + PCI_MSI_FLAGS);
> + if ((val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE) == 0) {
> + val |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE;
Why not assert the PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE flag unconditionally here?
> + dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, PCI_MSI_CAP +
> + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, val);
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Baruch Siach <baruch@tkos.co.il>
To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Cc: "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"andrew.smirnov@gmail.com" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 08:36:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874lbi6ih4.fsf@tkos.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544681043-3792-1-git-send-email-hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
Hi Richard,
Thanks for debugging this issue. One question below.
Richard Zhu writes:
> MSI_EN of iMX PCIe RC would be asserted when
> PCIEPORTBUS driver is selected.
> Thus, the MSI works fine on iMX PCIe before.
> Make a double check on this bit, and assert it
> when it is not set and MSI is supported.
> Otherwise, the MSI wouldn't be triggered although
> the EP is present and the MSIs are assigned.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 26087b3..6c3e56b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ struct imx6_pcie {
> #define PHY_PLL_LOCK_WAIT_USLEEP_MAX 200
>
> /* PCIe Root Complex registers (memory-mapped) */
> +#define PCI_MSI_CAP 0x50
> #define PCIE_RC_LCR 0x7c
> #define PCIE_RC_LCR_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS_GEN1 0x1
> #define PCIE_RC_LCR_MAX_LINK_SPEEDS_GEN2 0x2
> @@ -926,6 +927,7 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *dbi_base;
> struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
> int ret;
> + u16 val;
>
> imx6_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*imx6_pcie), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!imx6_pcie)
> @@ -1070,6 +1072,14 @@ static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = imx6_add_pcie_port(imx6_pcie, pdev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_MSI)) {
> + val = dw_pcie_readw_dbi(pci, PCI_MSI_CAP + PCI_MSI_FLAGS);
> + if ((val & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE) == 0) {
> + val |= PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE;
Why not assert the PCI_MSI_FLAGS_ENABLE flag unconditionally here?
> + dw_pcie_writew_dbi(pci, PCI_MSI_CAP +
> + PCI_MSI_FLAGS, val);
> + }
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
baruch
--
http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems
=}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{=
- baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il -
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 6:22 [PATCH] PCI: imx: make msi work without pcieportbus Richard Zhu
2018-12-13 6:22 ` Richard Zhu
2018-12-13 6:36 ` Baruch Siach [this message]
2018-12-13 6:36 ` Baruch Siach
2018-12-13 7:22 ` Richard Zhu
2018-12-13 7:22 ` Richard Zhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874lbi6ih4.fsf@tkos.co.il \
--to=baruch@tkos.co.il \
--cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.