* [PATCH v2 0/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao This series adds new vdso futex entries, allowing user to address the robust futex race condition regarding clearing the robust_list_head::list_op_pending pointer. Thomas wrote a summary of the problem: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260602084648.462672743@kernel.org/ The core infrastructure has been implemented along with x86 support. This series adds RISC-V support. The first 4 patches prepare compat vdso Makefile. The final patch is the main show. Nam Cao (5): riscv: compat_vdso: switch to standard kbuild rule riscv: compat_vdso: Allow *.c source files riscv: compat_vdso: Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable riscv: compat_vdso: Build with zacas if available riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 16 +++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h | 9 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 27 ++++--- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c | 3 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 57 +++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 14 +++- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +++ 10 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 0/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao This series adds new vdso futex entries, allowing user to address the robust futex race condition regarding clearing the robust_list_head::list_op_pending pointer. Thomas wrote a summary of the problem: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260602084648.462672743@kernel.org/ The core infrastructure has been implemented along with x86 support. This series adds RISC-V support. The first 4 patches prepare compat vdso Makefile. The final patch is the main show. Nam Cao (5): riscv: compat_vdso: switch to standard kbuild rule riscv: compat_vdso: Allow *.c source files riscv: compat_vdso: Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable riscv: compat_vdso: Build with zacas if available riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 16 +++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h | 9 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 27 ++++--- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c | 3 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 57 +++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 14 +++- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +++ 10 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/5] riscv: compat_vdso: switch to standard kbuild rule 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao The compat_vdso Makefile has a custom build rule for *.S files. This is unnecessary, and makes it hard to extend this Makefile to support building *.c files. Switch to standard kbuild rule instead. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- v2: remove unused COMPAT_CC [Sashiko] --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 24e37d1ef7ec..8a395b5dd037 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ compat_vdso-syms = rt_sigreturn compat_vdso-syms += getcpu compat_vdso-syms += flush_icache -COMPAT_CC := $(CC) COMPAT_LD := $(LD) # binutils 2.35 does not support the zifencei extension, but in the ISA @@ -43,8 +42,7 @@ $(obj)/compat_vdso.so.dbg: $(obj)/compat_vdso.lds $(obj-compat_vdso) FORCE LDFLAGS_compat_vdso.so.dbg = -shared -S -soname=linux-compat_vdso.so.1 \ --build-id=sha1 --hash-style=both --eh-frame-hdr -$(obj-compat_vdso): %.o: %.S FORCE - $(call if_changed_dep,compat_vdsoas) +$(obj-compat_vdso) : KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) # strip rule for the .so file $(obj)/%.so: OBJCOPYFLAGS := -S @@ -66,7 +64,3 @@ quiet_cmd_compat_vdsold = VDSOLD $@ cmd_compat_vdsold = $(COMPAT_LD) $(ld_flags) $(COMPAT_LD_FLAGS) -T $(filter-out FORCE,$^) -o $@.tmp && \ $(OBJCOPY) $(patsubst %, -G __compat_vdso_%, $(compat_vdso-syms)) $@.tmp $@ && \ rm $@.tmp - -# actual build commands -quiet_cmd_compat_vdsoas = VDSOAS $@ - cmd_compat_vdsoas = $(COMPAT_CC) $(a_flags) $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) -c -o $@ $< -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/5] riscv: compat_vdso: switch to standard kbuild rule @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao The compat_vdso Makefile has a custom build rule for *.S files. This is unnecessary, and makes it hard to extend this Makefile to support building *.c files. Switch to standard kbuild rule instead. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- v2: remove unused COMPAT_CC [Sashiko] --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 24e37d1ef7ec..8a395b5dd037 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ compat_vdso-syms = rt_sigreturn compat_vdso-syms += getcpu compat_vdso-syms += flush_icache -COMPAT_CC := $(CC) COMPAT_LD := $(LD) # binutils 2.35 does not support the zifencei extension, but in the ISA @@ -43,8 +42,7 @@ $(obj)/compat_vdso.so.dbg: $(obj)/compat_vdso.lds $(obj-compat_vdso) FORCE LDFLAGS_compat_vdso.so.dbg = -shared -S -soname=linux-compat_vdso.so.1 \ --build-id=sha1 --hash-style=both --eh-frame-hdr -$(obj-compat_vdso): %.o: %.S FORCE - $(call if_changed_dep,compat_vdsoas) +$(obj-compat_vdso) : KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) # strip rule for the .so file $(obj)/%.so: OBJCOPYFLAGS := -S @@ -66,7 +64,3 @@ quiet_cmd_compat_vdsold = VDSOLD $@ cmd_compat_vdsold = $(COMPAT_LD) $(ld_flags) $(COMPAT_LD_FLAGS) -T $(filter-out FORCE,$^) -o $@.tmp && \ $(OBJCOPY) $(patsubst %, -G __compat_vdso_%, $(compat_vdso-syms)) $@.tmp $@ && \ rm $@.tmp - -# actual build commands -quiet_cmd_compat_vdsoas = VDSOAS $@ - cmd_compat_vdsoas = $(COMPAT_CC) $(a_flags) $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) -c -o $@ $< -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Allow *.c source files 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao Extend to support building *.c files. This allows adding futex.c in a follow-up commit. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 8a395b5dd037..452c623d1a44 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ LDFLAGS_compat_vdso.so.dbg = -shared -S -soname=linux-compat_vdso.so.1 \ --build-id=sha1 --hash-style=both --eh-frame-hdr $(obj-compat_vdso) : KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) +$(obj-compat_vdso) : KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) # strip rule for the .so file $(obj)/%.so: OBJCOPYFLAGS := -S -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Allow *.c source files @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao Extend to support building *.c files. This allows adding futex.c in a follow-up commit. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 8a395b5dd037..452c623d1a44 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ LDFLAGS_compat_vdso.so.dbg = -shared -S -soname=linux-compat_vdso.so.1 \ --build-id=sha1 --hash-style=both --eh-frame-hdr $(obj-compat_vdso) : KBUILD_AFLAGS += $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) +$(obj-compat_vdso) : KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(COMPAT_CC_FLAGS) # strip rule for the .so file $(obj)/%.so: OBJCOPYFLAGS := -S -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao The -march option is inside COMPAT_CC_FLAGS, making it difficult to extend. Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable to allow extension. A follow-up commit will take advantage of this to add _zacas to -march. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 452c623d1a44..63580b33e3ce 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -13,10 +13,13 @@ COMPAT_LD := $(LD) # binutils 2.35 does not support the zifencei extension, but in the ISA # spec 20191213, G stands for IMAFD_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. ifdef CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI - COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32 + COMPAT_MARCH := rv32g else - COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32imafd -mabi=ilp32 + COMPAT_MARCH := rv32imafd endif + +COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=$(COMPAT_MARCH) -mabi=ilp32 + COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv # Disable attributes, as they're useless and break the build. -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao The -march option is inside COMPAT_CC_FLAGS, making it difficult to extend. Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable to allow extension. A follow-up commit will take advantage of this to add _zacas to -march. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 452c623d1a44..63580b33e3ce 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -13,10 +13,13 @@ COMPAT_LD := $(LD) # binutils 2.35 does not support the zifencei extension, but in the ISA # spec 20191213, G stands for IMAFD_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI. ifdef CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_EXPLICIT_ZICSR_ZIFENCEI - COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32g -mabi=ilp32 + COMPAT_MARCH := rv32g else - COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=rv32imafd -mabi=ilp32 + COMPAT_MARCH := rv32imafd endif + +COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=$(COMPAT_MARCH) -mabi=ilp32 + COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv # Disable attributes, as they're useless and break the build. -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Build with zacas if available 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao The compat vdso Makefile does not enable zacas, disallowing source files from using zacas instructions. This is an obstacle to adding robust __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock() in a follow-up commit. Build with zacas, if compiler supports it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 63580b33e3ce..ffbf84aeb081 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ else COMPAT_MARCH := rv32imafd endif +ifneq ($(call cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zacas),) +COMPAT_MARCH := $(COMPAT_MARCH)_zacas +endif + COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=$(COMPAT_MARCH) -mabi=ilp32 COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Build with zacas if available @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao The compat vdso Makefile does not enable zacas, disallowing source files from using zacas instructions. This is an obstacle to adding robust __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock() in a follow-up commit. Build with zacas, if compiler supports it. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index 63580b33e3ce..ffbf84aeb081 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ else COMPAT_MARCH := rv32imafd endif +ifneq ($(call cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zacas),) +COMPAT_MARCH := $(COMPAT_MARCH)_zacas +endif + COMPAT_CC_FLAGS := -march=$(COMPAT_MARCH) -mabi=ilp32 COMPAT_LD_FLAGS := -melf32lriscv -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao This is the RISC-V port for __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock(). It is based on the x86's implementation in commit 61cfc8e372d1 ("x86/vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support") and commit a2274cc0091e ("x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()"). When the FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK mechanism is used for unlocking (PI-)futexes, the unlock sequence in userspace looks like this: 1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex); 2) robust_list_remove(mutex); lval = gettid(); 3) if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mutex->lock, lval, 0)) 4) robust_list_clear_op_pending(); else 5) sys_futex(OP,...FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK); That still leaves a minimal race window between #3 and #4 where the mutex could be acquired by some other task which observes that it is the last user and: 1) unmaps the mutex memory 2) maps a different file, which ends up covering the same address When then the original task exits before reaching #4 then the kernel robust list handling observes the pending op entry and tries to fix up user space. In case that the newly mapped data contains the TID of the exiting thread at the address of the mutex/futex the kernel will set the owner died bit in that memory and therefore corrupt unrelated data. Provide a VDSO function which exposes the critical section window in the VDSO symbol table. The resulting addresses are updated in the task's mm when the VDSO is (re)map()'ed. The core code detects when a task was interrupted within the critical section and is about to deliver a signal. It then invokes an architecture specific function which determines whether the pending op pointer has to be cleared or not. The unlock assembly sequence on 64-bit is: mv a5, a0 ; move LOCK to a5 .Lretry lr.w a0, (a5) ; load *LOCK bne a0, a1, 24 .Lend ; if (*LOCK != TID) then exit sc.w.rl t0, zero, (a5) ; try changing *LOCK from TID to zero .Lstart bnez t0, .Lretry ; retry if store-conditional failed sd zero, 0(a2) ; clear POP .Lend sext.w a0,a0 ret So if the kernel sees that the user task is between .Lstart and .Lend, t0 can be checked to determine if the pending op pointer (POP) should be cleared. When the kernel is built with ZACAS, another unlock assembly sequence is provided using ZACAS instructions. If the CPU supports ZACAS, that alternative sequence is used and the critical section is also changed to that. There are two entry points to handle the different robust list pending op pointer sizes: __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock() __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock() The 32-bit VDSO and compat VDSO provides __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(). Unlike x86, the RISC-V 64-bit VDSO provides only provides __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock(). Because RISC-V threads can only have one list_op_pending pointer type. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- v2: - Do not register the critical session range of compat vdso for native tasks and vice versa [Sashiko] - Correctly use amocas.w.rl for 32-bit lock pointer --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 16 +++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h | 9 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 7 +- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c | 3 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 57 +++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 14 +++- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +++ 10 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index cb3d85abf595..0bf1f27f51f8 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ config RISCV select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE + select HAVE_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if MMU select HAVE_GENERIC_TIF_BITS select HAVE_GUP_FAST if MMU diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h index a8103edbf51f..f522c6c3cd97 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ #ifndef _ASM_CPUFEATURE_MACROS_H #define _ASM_CPUFEATURE_MACROS_H +#include <linux/types.h> + #include <asm/hwcap.h> #include <asm/alternative-macros.h> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..16ec58e925c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FUTEX_ROBUST_H +#define _ASM_RISCV_FUTEX_ROBUST_H + +#include <asm/ptrace.h> +#include <asm/vdso/futex.h> + +static inline void __user *arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + if (cpu_supports_zacas()) + return (regs->a0 == regs->a1) ? (void __user *)regs->a2 : NULL; + else + return (regs->t0 == 0) ? (void __user *)regs->a2 : NULL; +} + +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_FUTEX_ROBUST_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..89a8c425994b --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#include <asm/cpufeature-macros.h> + +static inline bool cpu_supports_zacas(void) +{ + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZACAS) && + riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS); +} diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index ffbf84aeb081..5736297e6281 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -31,7 +31,12 @@ COMPAT_CC_FLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-riscv-attribute) COMPAT_CC_FLAGS += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-mno-arch-attr) # Files to link into the compat_vdso -obj-compat_vdso = $(patsubst %, %.o, $(compat_vdso-syms)) note.o +obj-compat_vdso := $(patsubst %, %.o, $(compat_vdso-syms)) note.o + +ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK +compat_vdso-syms += __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock +obj-compat_vdso += futex.o +endif # Build rules targets := $(obj-compat_vdso) compat_vdso.so compat_vdso.so.dbg compat_vdso.lds diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ad05ded43955 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +#include "../vdso/futex.c" diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c index 9c2f5e442338..35db183a050e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/binfmts.h> #include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/futex.h> #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/vdso.h> #include <linux/vdso_datastore.h> @@ -33,11 +34,65 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info; static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info; #endif +#define _CONCAT3(a, b, c) a ## b ## c +#define CONCAT3(a, b, c) _CONCAT3(a, b, c) + +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) && defined(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZACAS) +#define FUTEX_CAS_OVERWRITE_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \ +{ \ + if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS)) { \ + void *start = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_cas_start));\ + void *end = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_cas_end)); \ + \ + futex_set_vdso_cs_range(fd, idx, (uintptr_t)start, (uintptr_t)end, xlen == 32); \ + } \ +} +#else +#define FUTEX_CAS_OVERWRITE_VDSO_CS_RANGE(...) +#endif + +#define FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \ +{ \ + void *start = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_lrsc_start)); \ + void *end = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_lrsc_end)); \ + \ + futex_set_vdso_cs_range(fd, idx, (uintptr_t)start, (uintptr_t)end, xlen == 32); \ + \ + FUTEX_CAS_OVERWRITE_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol); \ + \ +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK + +/* Allow parameters to expand first */ +#define __VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) +#define __COMPAT_VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) COMPAT_VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) + +static void vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(void) +{ + unsigned long vdso = (unsigned long) current->mm->context.vdso; + struct futex_mm_data *fd = ¤t->mm->futex; + + futex_reset_cs_ranges(fd); + + FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, 0, __riscv_xlen, __VDSO_SYMBOL); + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (is_compat_task()) + FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, 0, 32, __COMPAT_VDSO_SYMBOL); +#endif +} +#else +static inline void vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(void) {} +#endif + static int vdso_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma) { current->mm->context.vdso = (void *)new_vma->vm_start; + vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(); + return 0; } @@ -147,6 +202,8 @@ static int __setup_additional_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, if (IS_ERR(ret)) goto up_fail; + vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(); + return 0; up_fail: diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile index a842dc034571..9602c9172e04 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile @@ -27,12 +27,24 @@ asflags-y += -DVDSO_CFI=1 endif # Files to link into the vdso -obj-vdso = $(patsubst %, %.o, $(vdso-syms)) note.o +obj-vdso := $(patsubst %, %.o, $(vdso-syms)) note.o ifdef CONFIG_VDSO_GETRANDOM obj-vdso += vgetrandom-chacha.o endif +ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK + +obj-vdso += futex.o + +ifdef CONFIG_64BIT +vdso-syms += __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock +else +vdso-syms += __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock +endif + +endif + ccflags-y := -fno-stack-protector ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING ccflags-y += -fno-builtin diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7da77e635012 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +#include <linux/stringify.h> +#include <vdso/futex.h> +#include <asm/hwcap.h> +#include <asm/cpufeature-macros.h> +#include <asm/vdso/futex.h> + +#define LABEL(pop_size, which) __stringify(__vdso_futex_list##pop_size##_try_unlock_cs_##which) + +#define futex_robust_try_unlock_cas(pop_size, store_pop, lock, tid, pop) \ +({ \ + /* \ + * arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop() assumes the variables are in \ + * those registers. So make sure. \ + * \ + * tid and pop are in a1 and a2 at function entry according to the \ + * calling convention, so it likely still works if we remove _tid \ + * and _pop. But technically compiler is allowed to move tid and pop \ + * to different registers, and _tid and _pop do not generate any \ + * extra instructions so it does not hurt to keep them. \ + */ \ + register __u32 ret asm ("a0") = tid; \ + register __u32 _tid asm ("a1") = tid; \ + register void *_pop asm ("a2") = pop; \ + \ + asm volatile ( \ + " amocas.w.rl %[ret], zero, (%[lock])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, cas_start)":" \ + " bne %[ret], %[tid], "LABEL(pop_size, cas_end)"\n" \ + " "store_pop" zero, (%[pop])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, cas_end)":" \ + : [ret] "+&r" (ret) \ + : [tid] "r" (_tid), \ + [lock] "r" (lock), \ + [pop] "r" (_pop) \ + : "memory" \ + ); \ + \ + ret; \ +}) + +#define futex_robust_try_unlock_lrsc(pop_size, store_pop, lock, tid, pop) \ +({ \ + register void *_pop asm ("a2") = pop; \ + __u32 ret; \ + \ + asm volatile ( \ + "1: lr.w %[ret], (%[lock])\n" \ + " bne %[ret], %[tid], "LABEL(pop_size, lrsc_end)"\n" \ + " sc.w.rl t0, x0, (%[lock])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, lrsc_start)":" \ + " bnez t0, 1b\n" \ + " "store_pop" zero, (%[pop])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, lrsc_end)":" \ + : [ret] "=&r" (ret) \ + : [tid] "r" (tid), \ + [lock] "r" (lock), \ + [pop] "r" (_pop) \ + : "t0", "memory" \ + ); \ + \ + ret; \ +}) + + +#if __riscv_xlen == 64 +__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u64 *pop) +{ + if (cpu_supports_zacas()) + return futex_robust_try_unlock_cas(64, "sd", lock, tid, pop); + else + return futex_robust_try_unlock_lrsc(64, "sd", lock, tid, pop); +} +#endif + +#if __riscv_xlen == 32 +__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u32 *pop) +{ + if (cpu_supports_zacas()) + return futex_robust_try_unlock_cas(32, "sw", lock, tid, pop); + else + return futex_robust_try_unlock_lrsc(32, "sw", lock, tid, pop); +} +#endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S index c29ef12a63bb..9acfa9ef5bab 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S @@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ VERSION #endif #if defined(CONFIG_VDSO_GETRANDOM) && !defined(COMPAT_VDSO) __vdso_getrandom; +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK +#if defined(CONFIG_32BIT) || defined(COMPAT_VDSO) + __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock; +#else + __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock; +#endif #endif local: *; }; -- 2.47.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() @ 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Nam Cao This is the RISC-V port for __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock(). It is based on the x86's implementation in commit 61cfc8e372d1 ("x86/vdso: Prepare for robust futex unlock support") and commit a2274cc0091e ("x86/vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock()"). When the FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK mechanism is used for unlocking (PI-)futexes, the unlock sequence in userspace looks like this: 1) robust_list_set_op_pending(mutex); 2) robust_list_remove(mutex); lval = gettid(); 3) if (atomic_try_cmpxchg(&mutex->lock, lval, 0)) 4) robust_list_clear_op_pending(); else 5) sys_futex(OP,...FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK); That still leaves a minimal race window between #3 and #4 where the mutex could be acquired by some other task which observes that it is the last user and: 1) unmaps the mutex memory 2) maps a different file, which ends up covering the same address When then the original task exits before reaching #4 then the kernel robust list handling observes the pending op entry and tries to fix up user space. In case that the newly mapped data contains the TID of the exiting thread at the address of the mutex/futex the kernel will set the owner died bit in that memory and therefore corrupt unrelated data. Provide a VDSO function which exposes the critical section window in the VDSO symbol table. The resulting addresses are updated in the task's mm when the VDSO is (re)map()'ed. The core code detects when a task was interrupted within the critical section and is about to deliver a signal. It then invokes an architecture specific function which determines whether the pending op pointer has to be cleared or not. The unlock assembly sequence on 64-bit is: mv a5, a0 ; move LOCK to a5 .Lretry lr.w a0, (a5) ; load *LOCK bne a0, a1, 24 .Lend ; if (*LOCK != TID) then exit sc.w.rl t0, zero, (a5) ; try changing *LOCK from TID to zero .Lstart bnez t0, .Lretry ; retry if store-conditional failed sd zero, 0(a2) ; clear POP .Lend sext.w a0,a0 ret So if the kernel sees that the user task is between .Lstart and .Lend, t0 can be checked to determine if the pending op pointer (POP) should be cleared. When the kernel is built with ZACAS, another unlock assembly sequence is provided using ZACAS instructions. If the CPU supports ZACAS, that alternative sequence is used and the critical section is also changed to that. There are two entry points to handle the different robust list pending op pointer sizes: __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock() __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock() The 32-bit VDSO and compat VDSO provides __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(). Unlike x86, the RISC-V 64-bit VDSO provides only provides __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock(). Because RISC-V threads can only have one list_op_pending pointer type. Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> --- v2: - Do not register the critical session range of compat vdso for native tasks and vice versa [Sashiko] - Correctly use amocas.w.rl for 32-bit lock pointer --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h | 2 + arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h | 16 +++++ arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h | 9 +++ arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile | 7 +- arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c | 3 + arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 57 +++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile | 14 +++- arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S | 8 +++ 10 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index cb3d85abf595..0bf1f27f51f8 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -166,6 +166,7 @@ config RISCV select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_ARGS select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_FREGS select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER if HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE + select HAVE_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK select HAVE_EBPF_JIT if MMU select HAVE_GENERIC_TIF_BITS select HAVE_GUP_FAST if MMU diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h index a8103edbf51f..f522c6c3cd97 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature-macros.h @@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ #ifndef _ASM_CPUFEATURE_MACROS_H #define _ASM_CPUFEATURE_MACROS_H +#include <linux/types.h> + #include <asm/hwcap.h> #include <asm/alternative-macros.h> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..16ec58e925c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/futex_robust.h @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +#ifndef _ASM_RISCV_FUTEX_ROBUST_H +#define _ASM_RISCV_FUTEX_ROBUST_H + +#include <asm/ptrace.h> +#include <asm/vdso/futex.h> + +static inline void __user *arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop(struct pt_regs *regs) +{ + if (cpu_supports_zacas()) + return (regs->a0 == regs->a1) ? (void __user *)regs->a2 : NULL; + else + return (regs->t0 == 0) ? (void __user *)regs->a2 : NULL; +} + +#endif /* _ASM_RISCV_FUTEX_ROBUST_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..89a8c425994b --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/vdso/futex.h @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ + +#include <asm/cpufeature-macros.h> + +static inline bool cpu_supports_zacas(void) +{ + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZACAS) && + riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS); +} diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile index ffbf84aeb081..5736297e6281 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/Makefile @@ -31,7 +31,12 @@ COMPAT_CC_FLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mno-riscv-attribute) COMPAT_CC_FLAGS += $(call as-option,-Wa$(comma)-mno-arch-attr) # Files to link into the compat_vdso -obj-compat_vdso = $(patsubst %, %.o, $(compat_vdso-syms)) note.o +obj-compat_vdso := $(patsubst %, %.o, $(compat_vdso-syms)) note.o + +ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK +compat_vdso-syms += __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock +obj-compat_vdso += futex.o +endif # Build rules targets := $(obj-compat_vdso) compat_vdso.so compat_vdso.so.dbg compat_vdso.lds diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..ad05ded43955 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/compat_vdso/futex.c @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only + +#include "../vdso/futex.c" diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c index 9c2f5e442338..35db183a050e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ #include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/binfmts.h> #include <linux/err.h> +#include <linux/futex.h> #include <asm/page.h> #include <asm/vdso.h> #include <linux/vdso_datastore.h> @@ -33,11 +34,65 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info; static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info; #endif +#define _CONCAT3(a, b, c) a ## b ## c +#define CONCAT3(a, b, c) _CONCAT3(a, b, c) + +#if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZACAS) && defined(CONFIG_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_ZACAS) +#define FUTEX_CAS_OVERWRITE_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \ +{ \ + if (riscv_has_extension_unlikely(RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZACAS)) { \ + void *start = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_cas_start));\ + void *end = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_cas_end)); \ + \ + futex_set_vdso_cs_range(fd, idx, (uintptr_t)start, (uintptr_t)end, xlen == 32); \ + } \ +} +#else +#define FUTEX_CAS_OVERWRITE_VDSO_CS_RANGE(...) +#endif + +#define FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol) \ +{ \ + void *start = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_lrsc_start)); \ + void *end = symbol(vdso, CONCAT3(futex_list, xlen, _try_unlock_cs_lrsc_end)); \ + \ + futex_set_vdso_cs_range(fd, idx, (uintptr_t)start, (uintptr_t)end, xlen == 32); \ + \ + FUTEX_CAS_OVERWRITE_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, idx, xlen, symbol); \ + \ +} + +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK + +/* Allow parameters to expand first */ +#define __VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) +#define __COMPAT_VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) COMPAT_VDSO_SYMBOL(vdso, name) + +static void vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(void) +{ + unsigned long vdso = (unsigned long) current->mm->context.vdso; + struct futex_mm_data *fd = ¤t->mm->futex; + + futex_reset_cs_ranges(fd); + + FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, 0, __riscv_xlen, __VDSO_SYMBOL); + +#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT + if (is_compat_task()) + FUTEX_SET_VDSO_CS_RANGE(vdso, fd, 0, 32, __COMPAT_VDSO_SYMBOL); +#endif +} +#else +static inline void vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(void) {} +#endif + static int vdso_mremap(const struct vm_special_mapping *sm, struct vm_area_struct *new_vma) { current->mm->context.vdso = (void *)new_vma->vm_start; + vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(); + return 0; } @@ -147,6 +202,8 @@ static int __setup_additional_pages(struct mm_struct *mm, if (IS_ERR(ret)) goto up_fail; + vdso_futex_robust_unlock_update_ips(); + return 0; up_fail: diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile index a842dc034571..9602c9172e04 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/Makefile @@ -27,12 +27,24 @@ asflags-y += -DVDSO_CFI=1 endif # Files to link into the vdso -obj-vdso = $(patsubst %, %.o, $(vdso-syms)) note.o +obj-vdso := $(patsubst %, %.o, $(vdso-syms)) note.o ifdef CONFIG_VDSO_GETRANDOM obj-vdso += vgetrandom-chacha.o endif +ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK + +obj-vdso += futex.o + +ifdef CONFIG_64BIT +vdso-syms += __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock +else +vdso-syms += __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock +endif + +endif + ccflags-y := -fno-stack-protector ccflags-y += -DDISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING ccflags-y += -fno-builtin diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7da77e635012 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/futex.c @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +#include <linux/stringify.h> +#include <vdso/futex.h> +#include <asm/hwcap.h> +#include <asm/cpufeature-macros.h> +#include <asm/vdso/futex.h> + +#define LABEL(pop_size, which) __stringify(__vdso_futex_list##pop_size##_try_unlock_cs_##which) + +#define futex_robust_try_unlock_cas(pop_size, store_pop, lock, tid, pop) \ +({ \ + /* \ + * arch_futex_robust_unlock_get_pop() assumes the variables are in \ + * those registers. So make sure. \ + * \ + * tid and pop are in a1 and a2 at function entry according to the \ + * calling convention, so it likely still works if we remove _tid \ + * and _pop. But technically compiler is allowed to move tid and pop \ + * to different registers, and _tid and _pop do not generate any \ + * extra instructions so it does not hurt to keep them. \ + */ \ + register __u32 ret asm ("a0") = tid; \ + register __u32 _tid asm ("a1") = tid; \ + register void *_pop asm ("a2") = pop; \ + \ + asm volatile ( \ + " amocas.w.rl %[ret], zero, (%[lock])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, cas_start)":" \ + " bne %[ret], %[tid], "LABEL(pop_size, cas_end)"\n" \ + " "store_pop" zero, (%[pop])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, cas_end)":" \ + : [ret] "+&r" (ret) \ + : [tid] "r" (_tid), \ + [lock] "r" (lock), \ + [pop] "r" (_pop) \ + : "memory" \ + ); \ + \ + ret; \ +}) + +#define futex_robust_try_unlock_lrsc(pop_size, store_pop, lock, tid, pop) \ +({ \ + register void *_pop asm ("a2") = pop; \ + __u32 ret; \ + \ + asm volatile ( \ + "1: lr.w %[ret], (%[lock])\n" \ + " bne %[ret], %[tid], "LABEL(pop_size, lrsc_end)"\n" \ + " sc.w.rl t0, x0, (%[lock])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, lrsc_start)":" \ + " bnez t0, 1b\n" \ + " "store_pop" zero, (%[pop])\n" \ + LABEL(pop_size, lrsc_end)":" \ + : [ret] "=&r" (ret) \ + : [tid] "r" (tid), \ + [lock] "r" (lock), \ + [pop] "r" (_pop) \ + : "t0", "memory" \ + ); \ + \ + ret; \ +}) + + +#if __riscv_xlen == 64 +__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u64 *pop) +{ + if (cpu_supports_zacas()) + return futex_robust_try_unlock_cas(64, "sd", lock, tid, pop); + else + return futex_robust_try_unlock_lrsc(64, "sd", lock, tid, pop); +} +#endif + +#if __riscv_xlen == 32 +__u32 __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock(__u32 *lock, __u32 tid, __u32 *pop) +{ + if (cpu_supports_zacas()) + return futex_robust_try_unlock_cas(32, "sw", lock, tid, pop); + else + return futex_robust_try_unlock_lrsc(32, "sw", lock, tid, pop); +} +#endif diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S index c29ef12a63bb..9acfa9ef5bab 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso/vdso.lds.S @@ -82,6 +82,14 @@ VERSION #endif #if defined(CONFIG_VDSO_GETRANDOM) && !defined(COMPAT_VDSO) __vdso_getrandom; +#endif + +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX_ROBUST_UNLOCK +#if defined(CONFIG_32BIT) || defined(COMPAT_VDSO) + __vdso_futex_robust_list32_try_unlock; +#else + __vdso_futex_robust_list64_try_unlock; +#endif #endif local: *; }; -- 2.47.3 _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:38 ` Nam Cao -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> writes: > This series adds new vdso futex entries, allowing user to address the robust > futex race condition regarding clearing the robust_list_head::list_op_pending > pointer. > > Thomas wrote a summary of the problem: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260602084648.462672743@kernel.org/ > > The core infrastructure has been implemented along with x86 support. This > series adds RISC-V support. > > The first 4 patches prepare compat vdso Makefile. The final patch is the main > show. Sorry, I hit send before saving. This v2 addresses some of Sashiko's comments, while the rest of the comments are addressed by Thomas in: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260701-riscv-vdso-lto-v1-0-89db0cd82077@linutronix.de/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260630-riscv-vdso32-alternative-v1-0-a32fd89b7b1c@linutronix.de/ Nam ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() @ 2026-07-02 13:38 ` Nam Cao 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Nam Cao @ 2026-07-02 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Walmsley, Palmer Dabbelt, Albert Ou, Alexandre Ghiti, linux-riscv, linux-kernel, Thomas Weißschuh, André Almeida, Mathieu Desnoyers, Thomas Gleixner, Peter Zijlstra, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de> writes: > This series adds new vdso futex entries, allowing user to address the robust > futex race condition regarding clearing the robust_list_head::list_op_pending > pointer. > > Thomas wrote a summary of the problem: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20260602084648.462672743@kernel.org/ > > The core infrastructure has been implemented along with x86 support. This > series adds RISC-V support. > > The first 4 patches prepare compat vdso Makefile. The final patch is the main > show. Sorry, I hit send before saving. This v2 addresses some of Sashiko's comments, while the rest of the comments are addressed by Thomas in: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260701-riscv-vdso-lto-v1-0-89db0cd82077@linutronix.de/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260630-riscv-vdso32-alternative-v1-0-a32fd89b7b1c@linutronix.de/ Nam _______________________________________________ linux-riscv mailing list linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-02 13:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-07-02 13:34 [PATCH v2 0/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] riscv: compat_vdso: switch to standard kbuild rule Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Allow *.c source files Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Introduce COMPAT_MARCH variable Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] riscv: compat_vdso: Build with zacas if available Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] riscv: vdso: Implement __vdso_futex_robust_try_unlock() Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:34 ` Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Nam Cao 2026-07-02 13:38 ` Nam Cao
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.