All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	 linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: explicitly include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:22:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xkltfle.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307-spi-nor-headers-cleanup-v1-2-c186a9511c1e@linaro.org> (Tudor Ambarus's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:09:06 +0200")

Hello Tudor,

On 07/03/2025 at 09:09:06 +02, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> wrote:

> The core driver is using 'struct of_device_id' and relies on implicit
> inclusion of <linux/mod_devicetable.h>, which comes from
> <linux/of_platform.h>.

It is actually included from of.h now (since patch 1) and I wonder
whether there is a need for it to be included explicitly. As a user it
feels like "of.h" should already include whatever is needed for us (and
it's the case). Looking at the numbers, about 25% of the drivers do
include it explicitly. But either ways I'm fine.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Cc: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	 linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: explicitly include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:22:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875xkltfle.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307-spi-nor-headers-cleanup-v1-2-c186a9511c1e@linaro.org> (Tudor Ambarus's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2025 09:09:06 +0200")

Hello Tudor,

On 07/03/2025 at 09:09:06 +02, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> wrote:

> The core driver is using 'struct of_device_id' and relies on implicit
> inclusion of <linux/mod_devicetable.h>, which comes from
> <linux/of_platform.h>.

It is actually included from of.h now (since patch 1) and I wonder
whether there is a need for it to be included explicitly. As a user it
feels like "of.h" should already include whatever is needed for us (and
it's the case). Looking at the numbers, about 25% of the drivers do
include it explicitly. But either ways I'm fine.

Thanks,
Miquèl

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-07  7:09 [PATCH 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: headers cleanup Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  7:09 ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  7:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] mtd: spi-nor: explicitly include <linux/of.h> Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  7:09   ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  8:15   ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-07  8:15     ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-07  7:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] mtd: spi-nor: explicitly include <linux/mod_devicetable.h> Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  7:09   ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  8:22   ` Miquel Raynal [this message]
2025-03-07  8:22     ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-07 12:21     ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07 12:21       ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  7:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] mtd: spi-nor: drop unused <linux/of_platform.h> Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  7:09   ` Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-07  8:23   ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-07  8:23     ` Miquel Raynal
2025-03-18  6:04 ` (subset)Re: [PATCH 0/3] mtd: spi-nor: headers cleanup Tudor Ambarus
2025-03-18  6:04   ` Tudor Ambarus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875xkltfle.fsf@bootlin.com \
    --to=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.