From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Kevin Wolf" <kwolf@redhat.com>, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P.Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Anthony Green" <green@moxielogic.com>,
"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"QEMU Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Alistair Francis" <alistair.francis@wdc.com>,
"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
dirty.ice.hu@gmail.com, "Robert Hoo" <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Let's remove some deprecated stuff
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 12:39:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <875z00ayor.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8dWp0Y4=tA9wUZ10h5hNdaUP-xcCku96uhciB32i7gPg@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Maydell's message of "Thu, 29 Apr 2021 12:24:11 +0100")
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 at 12:19, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 29/04/2021 11.59, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> > If you're cc'ed, you added a section to docs/system/deprecated.rst that
>> > is old enough to permit removal. This is *not* a demand to remove, it's
>> > a polite request to consider whether the time for removal has come.
>> > Extra points for telling us in a reply. "We should remove, but I can't
>> > do it myself right now" is a valid answer. Let's review the file:
>> [...]
>> > Thomas Huth:
>> >
>> > ``moxie`` CPU (since 5.2.0)
>> > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>> >
>> > The ``moxie`` guest CPU support is deprecated and will be removed in
>> > a future version of QEMU. It's unclear whether anybody is still using
>> > CPU emulation in QEMU, and there are no test images available to make
>> > sure that the code is still working.
>>
>> I'm fine with dropping moxie now - I've never seen anybody using it and I've
>> never spotted any binaries in the internet that could still be used for
>> regression testing of this target. And I've also put Anthony Green on CC:
>> when I suggested the deprecation and he never replied. So I think it's
>> really completely unused.
>>
>> > ``lm32`` CPUs (since 5.2.0)
>> > '''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>> >
>> > The ``lm32`` guest CPU support is deprecated and will be removed in
>> > a future version of QEMU. The only public user of this architecture
>> > was the milkymist project, which has been dead for years; there was
>> > never an upstream Linux port.
>> >
>> > ``unicore32`` CPUs (since 5.2.0)
>> > ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
>> >
>> > The ``unicore32`` guest CPU support is deprecated and will be removed in
>> > a future version of QEMU. Support for this CPU was removed from the
>> > upstream Linux kernel, and there is no available upstream toolchain
>> > to build binaries for it.
>>
>> I didn't add these two entries to the deprecation list, I just moved them
>> around since they were in the wrong section. Both have been added by Peter
>> instead (commit d8498005122 and 8e4ff4a8d2b)
>
> Yes, I think moxie, lm32 and unicore32 are all OK to drop now.
Done:
[PATCH] Remove the deprecated moxie target
Message-Id: <20210430160355.698194-1-thuth@redhat.com>
[PATCH 0/2] Drop deprecated lm32 and unicore32
Message-Id: <20210503084034.3804963-1-armbru@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-03 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 9:59 Let's remove some deprecated stuff Markus Armbruster
2021-04-29 10:18 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-04-29 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-29 10:29 ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-29 10:35 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-29 10:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-04-30 10:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-29 11:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-29 10:25 ` Peter Maydell
2021-04-29 10:32 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2021-04-30 6:47 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-29 11:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-29 12:40 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-04-29 13:12 ` Kevin Wolf
2021-04-29 13:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-04-29 15:05 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-04-30 7:01 ` Markus Armbruster
2021-04-30 7:01 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2021-05-03 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-29 11:17 ` Thomas Huth
2021-04-29 11:24 ` Peter Maydell
2021-05-03 10:39 ` Markus Armbruster [this message]
2021-04-29 14:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2021-04-29 16:32 ` Eduardo Habkost
2021-04-30 3:22 ` Robert Hoo
2021-05-03 1:41 ` Alistair Francis
2021-05-03 4:49 ` Thomas Huth
2021-05-03 7:12 ` Alistair Francis
2021-05-03 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-03 22:57 ` Alistair Francis
2021-05-03 13:14 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2021-05-03 18:21 ` Eric Blake
2021-05-04 13:59 ` Peter Krempa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=875z00ayor.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org \
--to=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=alistair.francis@wdc.com \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=dirty.ice.hu@gmail.com \
--cc=green@moxielogic.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.