From: eric@anholt.net (Eric Anholt)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drm/pl111: Use max memory bandwidth for resolution
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:14:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <876074dax5.fsf@anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180206121854.4407-4-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes:
> We were previously selecting 1024x768 and 32BPP as the default
> set-up for the PL111 consumers.
>
> This does not work on elder systems: the device tree bindings
> support a property "max-memory-bandwidth" in bytes/second that
> states that if you exceed this the memory bus will saturate.
> The result is flickering and unstable images.
>
> Parse the "max-memory-bandwidth" and respect it when
> intializing the driver. On the RealView PB11MP, Versatile and
> Integrator/CP we get a nice console as default with this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Exploit the new .mode_valid() callback we added to the
> simple KMS helper.
> - Use the hardcoded bits per pixel per variant instead of
> trying to be heuristic about this setting for now.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drm.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> index d75923896609..a1ca9e1ffe15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,35 @@ irqreturn_t pl111_irq(int irq, void *data)
> return status;
> }
>
> +static enum drm_mode_status
> +pl111_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
> + struct pl111_drm_dev_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
> + u32 cpp = priv->variant->fb_bpp / 8;
> + u64 bw;
Using the variant->fb_bpp for mode_valid checks here feels wrong to me
-- it means a larger mode wouldn't be considered valid on a
32bpp-preferred platform when 16bpp would make it work, and a 16bpp
platform will happily try to set a 32bpp mode that exceeds the
bandwidth.
On the other hand, if it makes things work most of the time I'm also
kind of OK with it. Anyone else want to chime in here?
> + /*
> + * We use the pixelclock to also account for interlaced modes, the
> + * resulting bandwidth is in bytes per second.
> + */
> + bw = mode->clock * 1000; /* In Hz */
> + bw = bw * mode->hdisplay * mode->vdisplay * cpp;
> + bw = div_u64(bw, mode->htotal * mode->vtotal);
> +
> + if (bw > priv->memory_bw) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("%d x %d @ %d Hz, %d cpp, bw %llu too fast\n",
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->clock, cpp, bw);
> +
> + return MODE_BAD;
> + }
> + DRM_DEBUG("%d x %d @ %d Hz, %d cpp, bw %llu bytes/s OK\n",
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->clock, cpp, bw);
> +
> + return MODE_OK;
> +}
Maybe DRM_DEBUG_KMS for these?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20180210/4df74e8d/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/pl111: Use max memory bandwidth for resolution
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 17:14:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <876074dax5.fsf@anholt.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180206121854.4407-4-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2812 bytes --]
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> writes:
> We were previously selecting 1024x768 and 32BPP as the default
> set-up for the PL111 consumers.
>
> This does not work on elder systems: the device tree bindings
> support a property "max-memory-bandwidth" in bytes/second that
> states that if you exceed this the memory bus will saturate.
> The result is flickering and unstable images.
>
> Parse the "max-memory-bandwidth" and respect it when
> intializing the driver. On the RealView PB11MP, Versatile and
> Integrator/CP we get a nice console as default with this code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Exploit the new .mode_valid() callback we added to the
> simple KMS helper.
> - Use the hardcoded bits per pixel per variant instead of
> trying to be heuristic about this setting for now.
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drm.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_drv.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> index d75923896609..a1ca9e1ffe15 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> @@ -50,6 +50,35 @@ irqreturn_t pl111_irq(int irq, void *data)
> return status;
> }
>
> +static enum drm_mode_status
> +pl111_mode_valid(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> + const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> +{
> + struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
> + struct pl111_drm_dev_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
> + u32 cpp = priv->variant->fb_bpp / 8;
> + u64 bw;
Using the variant->fb_bpp for mode_valid checks here feels wrong to me
-- it means a larger mode wouldn't be considered valid on a
32bpp-preferred platform when 16bpp would make it work, and a 16bpp
platform will happily try to set a 32bpp mode that exceeds the
bandwidth.
On the other hand, if it makes things work most of the time I'm also
kind of OK with it. Anyone else want to chime in here?
> + /*
> + * We use the pixelclock to also account for interlaced modes, the
> + * resulting bandwidth is in bytes per second.
> + */
> + bw = mode->clock * 1000; /* In Hz */
> + bw = bw * mode->hdisplay * mode->vdisplay * cpp;
> + bw = div_u64(bw, mode->htotal * mode->vtotal);
> +
> + if (bw > priv->memory_bw) {
> + DRM_DEBUG("%d x %d @ %d Hz, %d cpp, bw %llu too fast\n",
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->clock, cpp, bw);
> +
> + return MODE_BAD;
> + }
> + DRM_DEBUG("%d x %d @ %d Hz, %d cpp, bw %llu bytes/s OK\n",
> + mode->hdisplay, mode->vdisplay, mode->clock, cpp, bw);
> +
> + return MODE_OK;
> +}
Maybe DRM_DEBUG_KMS for these?
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-10 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-06 12:18 [PATCH 0/3] Bandwidth limitation on PL111, take 2 Linus Walleij
2018-02-06 12:18 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-06 12:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] drm: simple_kms_helper: Add mode_valid() callback support Linus Walleij
2018-02-06 12:18 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-10 17:08 ` Eric Anholt
2018-02-10 17:08 ` Eric Anholt
2018-02-19 9:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-02-19 9:40 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-02-06 12:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] drm/pl111: Make the default BPP a per-variant variable Linus Walleij
2018-02-06 12:18 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-10 17:10 ` Eric Anholt
2018-02-10 17:10 ` Eric Anholt
2018-02-06 12:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] drm/pl111: Use max memory bandwidth for resolution Linus Walleij
2018-02-06 12:18 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-10 17:14 ` Eric Anholt [this message]
2018-02-10 17:14 ` Eric Anholt
2018-02-11 11:05 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-11 11:05 ` Linus Walleij
2018-02-22 20:30 ` Eric Anholt
2018-02-22 20:30 ` Eric Anholt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=876074dax5.fsf@anholt.net \
--to=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.