* stability of IMQ?
@ 2004-09-01 20:01 Tobias DiPasquale
2004-09-02 3:58 ` Dinil Divakaran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tobias DiPasquale @ 2004-09-01 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter, netfilter-devel, linux-net
Hi all,
I am considering using IMQ for some ingress shaping action and I was
wondering if anyone else was using it and how stable it is. Have their
been an persistent Oops problems? Any other serious issues? The site
seems to indicate some problems in certain situations, so I was
wondering about this before I got into it too heavily. Thanks for all
the help in advance!
--
[ Tobias DiPasquale ]
0x636f6465736c696e67657240676d61696c2e636f6d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: stability of IMQ?
2004-09-01 20:01 stability of IMQ? Tobias DiPasquale
@ 2004-09-02 3:58 ` Dinil Divakaran
2004-09-06 14:55 ` Andre Correa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dinil Divakaran @ 2004-09-02 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tobias DiPasquale; +Cc: linux-net, netfilter-devel, netfilter
>
> I am considering using IMQ for some ingress shaping action and I was
> wondering if anyone else was using it and how stable it is. Have their
> been an persistent Oops problems? Any other serious issues? The site
> seems to indicate some problems in certain situations, so I was
> wondering about this before I got into it too heavily. Thanks for all
> the help in advance!
I 've used IMQ on kernel 2.4.21 and it doesn't seem to have
any kind of problem.
I couldn't get it working for 2.6.7 kernel. There was some problem
patching iptabels !
Cheers,
Dinil
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: stability of IMQ?
2004-09-02 3:58 ` Dinil Divakaran
@ 2004-09-06 14:55 ` Andre Correa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Andre Correa @ 2004-09-06 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dinil Divakaran; +Cc: Tobias DiPasquale, linux-net, netfilter-devel, netfilter
Hi, I can tell that IMQ is proving to be much more stable then it was
suppoed to be on january when we got the project up again after being
unmantained for some time. Users mailling list has more then 200 people
now and many of then, including me, using IMQ on heavy traffic gateways
without problems.
You just should avoid modules on 2.6 series. There is a reported issue
with iptraf on 2.6 too (it stops counters, not the traffic), nothing
serious.
A new version is about to be released for <=2.6.7 with new features like
choose number of devices, choosing "where" it hooks and some others.
Dinil, I would like to ask you to report your issue with iptables to the
IMQ list or directly to me so we can investigate what went wrong and, if
needed, find a solution.
Tks
Andre
Dinil Divakaran wrote:
>>
>> I am considering using IMQ for some ingress shaping action and I was
>> wondering if anyone else was using it and how stable it is. Have their
>> been an persistent Oops problems? Any other serious issues? The site
>> seems to indicate some problems in certain situations, so I was
>> wondering about this before I got into it too heavily. Thanks for all
>> the help in advance!
>
>
> I 've used IMQ on kernel 2.4.21 and it doesn't seem to have
> any kind of problem.
>
> I couldn't get it working for 2.6.7 kernel. There was some problem
> patching iptabels !
>
> Cheers,
> Dinil
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-06 14:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-01 20:01 stability of IMQ? Tobias DiPasquale
2004-09-02 3:58 ` Dinil Divakaran
2004-09-06 14:55 ` Andre Correa
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.