From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:44:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cnh60ap.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019130843.GI2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> * Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [2023-10-19 15:41:40]:
>
>> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > The ability to detect if the system is running in a shared processor
>> > mode is helpful in few more generic cases not just in
>> > paravirtualization.
>> > For example: At boot time, different scheduler/ topology flags may be
>> > set based on the processor mode. Hence move it to a more generic file.
>>
>> I'd rather you just included paravirt.h in the few files where you need it.
>
> I thought, detecting if a Processor was shared or not was more a
> smp/processor related than a paravirt related.
It's both really :)
It's definitely paravirt related though, because if we weren't
*para*virt then we wouldn't know there was a hypervisor at all :)
But having smaller more focused headers is preferable in general just
for mechanical reasons.
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:44:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cnh60ap.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019130843.GI2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> * Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [2023-10-19 15:41:40]:
>
>> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > The ability to detect if the system is running in a shared processor
>> > mode is helpful in few more generic cases not just in
>> > paravirtualization.
>> > For example: At boot time, different scheduler/ topology flags may be
>> > set based on the processor mode. Hence move it to a more generic file.
>>
>> I'd rather you just included paravirt.h in the few files where you need it.
>
> I thought, detecting if a Processor was shared or not was more a
> smp/processor related than a paravirt related.
It's both really :)
It's definitely paravirt related though, because if we weren't
*para*virt then we wouldn't know there was a hypervisor at all :)
But having smaller more focused headers is preferable in general just
for mechanical reasons.
cheers
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rohan McLure <rmclure@linux.ibm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Ajay Kaher <akaher@vmware.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <amakhalov@vmware.com>,
VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 21:44:14 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cnh60ap.fsf@mail.lhotse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231019130843.GI2194132@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> * Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> [2023-10-19 15:41:40]:
>
>> Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>> > The ability to detect if the system is running in a shared processor
>> > mode is helpful in few more generic cases not just in
>> > paravirtualization.
>> > For example: At boot time, different scheduler/ topology flags may be
>> > set based on the processor mode. Hence move it to a more generic file.
>>
>> I'd rather you just included paravirt.h in the few files where you need it.
>
> I thought, detecting if a Processor was shared or not was more a
> smp/processor related than a paravirt related.
It's both really :)
It's definitely paravirt related though, because if we weren't
*para*virt then we wouldn't know there was a hypervisor at all :)
But having smaller more focused headers is preferable in general just
for mechanical reasons.
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-20 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-18 16:37 [PATCH v2 0/6] powerpc/smp: Shared processor sched optimizations Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] powerpc/smp: Cache CPU has Asymmetric SMP Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 4:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 4:33 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-20 9:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-20 9:09 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] powerpc/smp: Enable Asym packing for cores on shared processor Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 11:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 11:50 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 12:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 12:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 15:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-10-19 15:56 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-10-20 5:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-20 5:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] powerpc/smp: Move shared_processor static key to smp.h Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 4:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 4:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 4:41 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 13:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 13:08 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-20 10:44 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-10-20 10:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-20 10:44 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 10:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-10-19 10:30 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2023-10-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] powerpc/smp: Disable MC domain for shared processor Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 4:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 4:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 13:23 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 13:23 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 13:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 13:16 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] powerpc/smp: Add read_mostly attribute Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 4:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 4:49 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-10-19 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-19 12:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-19 12:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] powerpc/smp: Avoid asym packing within thread_group of a core Srikar Dronamraju
2023-10-18 16:37 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cnh60ap.fsf@mail.lhotse \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=akaher@vmware.com \
--cc=amakhalov@vmware.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=rmclure@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.