Re: [PATCH v9 06/14] mm: multi-gen LRU: minimal implementation

["Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>]

Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> writes:

 +
> +static void inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec)
> +{
> +	int type;
> +	struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> +
> +	VM_BUG_ON(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
> +
> +	for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
> +		if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, type) != MAX_NR_GENS)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		reset_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, true);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(lrugen->min_seq[type], lrugen->min_seq[type] + 1);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static bool try_to_inc_min_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, bool can_swap)
> +{
> +	int gen, type, zone;
> +	bool success = false;
> +	struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> +	DEFINE_MIN_SEQ(lruvec);
> +
> +	VM_BUG_ON(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
> +
> +	for (type = !can_swap; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
> +		while (min_seq[type] + MIN_NR_GENS <= lrugen->max_seq) {
> +			gen = lru_gen_from_seq(min_seq[type]);
> +
> +			for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> +				if (!list_empty(&lrugen->lists[gen][type][zone]))
> +					goto next;
> +			}
> +
> +			min_seq[type]++;
> +		}
> +next:
> +		;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* see the comment on lru_gen_struct */
> +	if (can_swap) {
> +		min_seq[LRU_GEN_ANON] = min(min_seq[LRU_GEN_ANON], min_seq[LRU_GEN_FILE]);
> +		min_seq[LRU_GEN_FILE] = max(min_seq[LRU_GEN_ANON], lrugen->min_seq[LRU_GEN_FILE]);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (type = !can_swap; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
> +		if (min_seq[type] == lrugen->min_seq[type])
> +			continue;
> +
> +		reset_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, true);
> +		WRITE_ONCE(lrugen->min_seq[type], min_seq[type]);
> +		success = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	return success;
> +}
> +
> +static void inc_max_seq(struct lruvec *lruvec, unsigned long max_seq)
> +{
> +	int prev, next;
> +	int type, zone;
> +	struct lru_gen_struct *lrugen = &lruvec->lrugen;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> +
> +	VM_BUG_ON(!seq_is_valid(lruvec));
> +
> +	if (max_seq != lrugen->max_seq)
> +		goto unlock;
> +
> +	inc_min_seq(lruvec);

Can this min seq update result in pages considered oldest become young.
ie, if we had seq value of 0 - 3 and we need ageing, the new min seq and
max_seq value will now become 1 - 4. What happens to pages in the
generation value 0 which was oldest generation earlier and is youngest
now.


> +
> +	/* update the active/inactive LRU sizes for compatibility */
> +	prev = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->max_seq - 1);
> +	next = lru_gen_from_seq(lrugen->max_seq + 1);
> +
> +	for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++) {
> +		for (zone = 0; zone < MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> +			enum lru_list lru = type * LRU_INACTIVE_FILE;
> +			long delta = lrugen->nr_pages[prev][type][zone] -
> +				     lrugen->nr_pages[next][type][zone];
> +
> +			if (!delta)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			__update_lru_size(lruvec, lru, zone, delta);
> +			__update_lru_size(lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE, zone, -delta);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	for (type = 0; type < ANON_AND_FILE; type++)
> +		reset_ctrl_pos(lruvec, type, false);
> +
> +	/* make sure preceding modifications appear */
> +	smp_store_release(&lrugen->max_seq, lrugen->max_seq + 1);
> +unlock:
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> +}
> +

....

 +
> +static int evict_folios(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc, int swappiness)
> +{
> +	int type;
> +	int scanned;
> +	int reclaimed;
> +	LIST_HEAD(list);
> +	struct folio *folio;
> +	enum vm_event_item item;
> +	struct reclaim_stat stat;
> +	struct mem_cgroup *memcg = lruvec_memcg(lruvec);
> +	struct pglist_data *pgdat = lruvec_pgdat(lruvec);
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&lruvec->lru_lock);
> +
> +	scanned = isolate_folios(lruvec, sc, swappiness, &type, &list);
> +
> +	if (try_to_inc_min_seq(lruvec, swappiness))
> +		scanned++;

we are doing this before we shrink the page list. Any reason to do this before?

> +
> +	if (get_nr_gens(lruvec, LRU_GEN_FILE) == MIN_NR_GENS)
> +		scanned = 0;