All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add basic ARMv8.6 support
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:57:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877decotwi.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cf7b564-63c2-ac6c-a083-f7ac2caab6fc@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,

On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:59:33 +0100,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> 
> On 11/10/2021 15:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > Thanks for that. All addressed now. I'll repost the series once we've
> > addressed the question below.
> > 
> >> How do you want to merge this series? It would be nice to have the arch
> >> bits in the arm64 tree, if possible, as we'll be tripping over the cpucaps
> >> stuff otherwise.
> > 
> > I think we should keep the series together, as asm/arch_timer.h gets a
> > beating all over the place, and there is no chance the arm64 bits at
> > the end can apply (let alone work) on their own.
> > 
> > So either Daniel would ack the series for it to go via arm64, or
> > create a stable branch with the first 13 patches that would go in both
> > the clocksource and arm64 trees.
> > 
> > Daniel, any preference?
> 
> yes, I prefer a stable branch for this series.
> 
> https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/armv8.6_arch_timer
> 

OK, this branch is now slightly outdated, since I have reworked it at
Will's request. -rc5 is also too recent a base for arm64, which is
usually based on -rc3.

I'll repost a new series today or tomorrow and provide tags for both
you and Will to pull from.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@google.com>,
	Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@google.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add basic ARMv8.6 support
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2021 10:57:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877decotwi.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2cf7b564-63c2-ac6c-a083-f7ac2caab6fc@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,

On Sat, 16 Oct 2021 22:59:33 +0100,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Marc,
> 
> 
> On 11/10/2021 15:39, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > Thanks for that. All addressed now. I'll repost the series once we've
> > addressed the question below.
> > 
> >> How do you want to merge this series? It would be nice to have the arch
> >> bits in the arm64 tree, if possible, as we'll be tripping over the cpucaps
> >> stuff otherwise.
> > 
> > I think we should keep the series together, as asm/arch_timer.h gets a
> > beating all over the place, and there is no chance the arm64 bits at
> > the end can apply (let alone work) on their own.
> > 
> > So either Daniel would ack the series for it to go via arm64, or
> > create a stable branch with the first 13 patches that would go in both
> > the clocksource and arm64 trees.
> > 
> > Daniel, any preference?
> 
> yes, I prefer a stable branch for this series.
> 
> https://git.linaro.org/people/daniel.lezcano/linux.git/log/?h=timers/drivers/armv8.6_arch_timer
> 

OK, this branch is now slightly outdated, since I have reworked it at
Will's request. -rc5 is also too recent a base for arm64, which is
usually based on -rc3.

I'll repost a new series today or tomorrow and provide tags for both
you and Will to pull from.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-17  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-10 11:42 [PATCH v3 00/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add basic ARMv8.6 support Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add build-time guards for unhandled register accesses Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Drop CNT*_TVAL read accessors Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Extend write side of timer register accessors to u64 Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Move system register timer programming over to CVAL Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Move drop _tval from erratum function names Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Fix MMIO base address vs callback ordering issue Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Move MMIO timer programming over to CVAL Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Advertise 56bit timer to the core code Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Work around broken CVAL implementations Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Remove any trace of the TVAL programming interface Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Drop unnecessary ISB on CVAL programming Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Fix masking for high freq counters Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] clocksource/arch_arm_timer: Move workaround synchronisation around Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] arm64: Add a capability for FEAT_ECV Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-11 10:56   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 10:56     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 10:57     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 10:57       ` Will Deacon
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] arm64: Add CNT{P, V}CTSS_EL0 alternatives to cnt{p, v}ct_el0 Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` [PATCH v3 15/17] arm64: Add CNT{P,V}CTSS_EL0 alternatives to cnt{p,v}ct_el0 Marc Zyngier
2021-10-11 10:33   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 10:33     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] arm64: Add handling of CNTVCTSS traps Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-11 10:54   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 10:54     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-10 11:43 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] arm64: Add HWCAP for self-synchronising virtual counter Marc Zyngier
2021-10-10 11:43   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-11 11:00   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 11:00     ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 11:02 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] clocksource/arm_arch_timer: Add basic ARMv8.6 support Will Deacon
2021-10-11 11:02   ` Will Deacon
2021-10-11 13:39   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-11 13:39     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-16 21:59     ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-16 21:59       ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-17  9:57       ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-10-17  9:57         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-18  7:51         ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-18  7:51           ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-19  8:00           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-19  8:00             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-10-19  8:04             ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-19  8:04               ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-19 11:09           ` Will Deacon
2021-10-19 11:09             ` Will Deacon
2021-10-19 11:10             ` Daniel Lezcano
2021-10-19 11:10               ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877decotwi.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=oupton@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=rananta@google.com \
    --cc=ricarkol@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.