From: "Keith Packard" <keithp@keithp.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Thierry Reding" <treding@nvidia.com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: vblank: use ktime_t instead of timeval
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 13:17:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ew18mn5.fsf@keithp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a16As7HfzTbRBDyMjbdMHcGpxUYbzyu0DV8KNkeqdMn3g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 549 bytes --]
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> writes:
> That is an interesting coincidence, I created my patch earlier this week
> without having any idea that others were looking at the same files.
My requirements were to support 64-bit vblank counts and ns precision
vblank timing for Vulkan; obviously using ktime_t was a good cleaup at
the same time.
My patch also widens the sequence numbers to 64-bits, so it's a superset
of Arnd's patch; rebasing should be straightforward (although not
automatic) if that's what we want to do.
--
-keith
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 15:20 [PATCH 1/2] drm: vblank: use ktime_t instead of timeval Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 15:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm: vblank: remove drm_timestamp_monotonic parameter Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 15:40 ` Daniel Stone
2017-10-11 15:40 ` Daniel Stone
2017-10-11 17:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm: vblank: use ktime_t instead of timeval Sean Paul
2017-10-11 17:36 ` Sean Paul
2017-10-11 19:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 19:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-10-11 20:17 ` Keith Packard [this message]
2017-10-11 20:18 ` Keith Packard
2017-10-11 20:18 ` Keith Packard
2017-10-11 20:28 ` Sean Paul
2017-10-11 21:07 ` Keith Packard
2017-10-12 13:04 ` Sean Paul
2017-10-12 13:04 ` Sean Paul
2017-10-12 18:20 ` Keith Packard
2017-10-12 18:20 ` Keith Packard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ew18mn5.fsf@keithp.com \
--to=keithp@keithp.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanpaul@chromium.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.