From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 0/3] Travis updates
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:43:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fiqyw92.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AC86FF.2050806@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> writes:
> 28.01.2016 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think
>> it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it
>> negligible compared to the old style VM builds at the moment. I
>> suspect this may be because the new infrastructure is under more load
>> as more projects have migrated.
>
> I'm applying all this to -trivial, but without trying to understand
> what it is all about, as I don't know travis.
Maybe we should hold off for now until the later ones have been reviewed
(David has some comments on 2/3). I guess it was really a question of if
trivial is the right tree for these patches to go upstream.
Maybe what's really needed is a build and test automation tree (and
associated maintainer)? Peter any comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> /mjt
--
Alex Bennée
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Travis updates
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 08:43:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877fiqyw92.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56AC86FF.2050806@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> writes:
> 28.01.2016 17:23, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The first patch has been reviewed and signed off. Long term I think
>> it is worth applying but it look like the performance increase it
>> negligible compared to the old style VM builds at the moment. I
>> suspect this may be because the new infrastructure is under more load
>> as more projects have migrated.
>
> I'm applying all this to -trivial, but without trying to understand
> what it is all about, as I don't know travis.
Maybe we should hold off for now until the later ones have been reviewed
(David has some comments on 2/3). I guess it was really a question of if
trivial is the right tree for these patches to go upstream.
Maybe what's really needed is a build and test automation tree (and
associated maintainer)? Peter any comments?
>
> Thanks,
>
> /mjt
--
Alex Bennée
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-31 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 14:23 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 0/3] Travis updates Alex Bennée
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Bennée
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 1/3] .travis.yml: migrate to container builds Alex Bennée
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Bennée
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 2/3] .travis.yml: run make check for all matrix targets Alex Bennée
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Bennée
2016-01-30 12:35 ` [Qemu-trivial] " David Gibson
2016-01-30 12:35 ` [Qemu-devel] " David Gibson
2016-01-31 8:37 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Alex Bennée
2016-01-31 8:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Bennée
2016-01-31 10:27 ` [Qemu-trivial] " David Gibson
2016-01-31 10:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " David Gibson
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 3/3] .travis.yml: enable each of the co-routine backends Alex Bennée
2016-01-28 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Bennée
2016-01-30 9:48 ` [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH v3 0/3] Travis updates Michael Tokarev
2016-01-30 9:48 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Tokarev
2016-01-31 8:43 ` Alex Bennée [this message]
2016-01-31 8:43 ` Alex Bennée
2016-01-31 12:05 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Peter Maydell
2016-01-31 12:05 ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2016-02-02 7:59 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Michael Tokarev
2016-02-02 7:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Tokarev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877fiqyw92.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.